AutosTalk Forums  

4x4 usefulness

4x4 Cars Discussions about 4x4 cars. The on and off-road four wheel drive vehicle. (rec.autos.4x4)


Discuss 4x4 usefulness in the 4x4 Cars forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old   
Fuller Wrath
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 4x4 usefulness - 03-12-2009 , 10:37 PM






get over it. you lost.


<rainman1949 (AT) webtv (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
micrometer???? i bet u drive one of those smart cars... 2 seater and u
also believe that democrats are for the workers too???

smart cars, democrats, global warming, taxes, user taxes, less unions
and more illegals working for the democrats, and to think I drive oh
nooooo... one of those dreaded big, 4x4 suvs.... simply unbelievable....
but i have been thinking of down grading my ride to a 94 transam.. 350,
6 speed.... (do u know what a manual transmission is, i bet u never
heard of a clutch or a clutch pedal)... i think i will keep them both...
summer car, and a winter car....
both belching gas guzzlers... love it..... the smell of rubber on the
road..nothing like it...

and speaking of carbon footprints,,,

how about a twin motor, military jet holds 12 passengers.. (the
ultimate suv).
do u know that the speaker of the house has this military jet plane for
her own use. She uses it to fly back and forth from ca to
washington,and other places. She doesnt worry about her carbon
footprint, and the suvs that demoract politicians drive, ohhhh the
carbon foortprints...... the earth is doomed...

i am not responsible for u not having any fun whle u are driving your
two seater smart car, while politicians are driving and flying suvs.

just kidding....




Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old   
rainman1949@webtv.net
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 4x4 usefulness - 03-16-2009 , 10:06 PM






that is the best u can do???? wow.. u better stop driving that little 2
seater car, before a bst passes u and the gust of wind will blow u rite
off the road.... ...


Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old   
Fuller Wrath
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 4x4 usefulness - 03-18-2009 , 12:04 PM



more testicle talk. tiny testicle talk. very small. who are you trying to
impress with those pea shooters?

<rainman1949 (AT) webtv (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
that is the best u can do???? wow.. u better stop driving that little 2
seater car, before a bst passes u and the gust of wind will blow u rite
off the road.... ...




Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old   
STURGON@webtv.net
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 4x4 usefulness - 03-22-2009 , 06:39 PM



we all lost!

writesoon!


Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old   
rainman1949@webtv.net
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 4x4 usefulness - 03-30-2009 , 09:50 PM



just read your last attempt.. seems to me u are way to interested in
testicals, to be driving a true 4x4....or even remotely interested in
vehicles...

Have another project jeep in mind... the ultimate....

late model cj type... the only thing worth saving is the frame.... a
aluminum body (4K).
a jeep 4.0 engine block, with a twist using a amc 4.2 head... turns the
4.0, to a 4.2.... and some other little things,,,


Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old   
Will Honea
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 4x4 usefulness - 03-30-2009 , 11:20 PM



rainman1949 (AT) webtv (DOT) net wrote:

Quote:
just read your last attempt.. seems to me u are way to interested in
testicals, to be driving a true 4x4....or even remotely interested in
vehicles...

Have another project jeep in mind... the ultimate....

late model cj type... the only thing worth saving is the frame.... a
aluminum body (4K).
a jeep 4.0 engine block, with a twist using a amc 4.2 head... turns the
4.0, to a 4.2.... and some other little things,,,
Unless the laws of physics have been "changed" by the new administration, it
ain't gonna do that. The displacement (4.0 -> 4.2) requires one of two
things: a larger bore and piston or a longer stroke of the existing piston.
Check the Jeep groups for the subject "stroker" - that's what you are
trying to accomplish. It does produce one helluva torque with the longer
stroke - wish I had one.

--
Will Honea



Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old   
rainman1949@webtv.net
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 4x4 usefulness - 03-31-2009 , 09:39 PM



believe me the block, and the head are being worked.... stroker
forsure...also, a chevy pic up truck rear end will be using it for the
front... will have to put specially made seals for this too work.. but
the torque,,, and match that up with a chevy trans....


Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old   
rainman1949@webtv.net
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 4x4 usefulness - 03-31-2009 , 10:38 PM



think outside the box.... just a few alterations.....
have a dodge slant 6 75 vintage, the larger block, the rear end is
positrac.... (thebody is gone though), intake manifold 4 barrel from
the two barrel one.. .. been thinking of a postal jeep with some
alterations... getting the list together.....


Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old   
Fuller Wrath
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 4x4 usefulness - 03-31-2009 , 11:26 PM



the last administration was the one that couldn't count; add; multiply;
divide; think; speak; but they sure could drink and spend money.


"Will Honea" <whonea (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
rainman1949 (AT) webtv (DOT) net wrote:

just read your last attempt.. seems to me u are way to interested in
testicals, to be driving a true 4x4....or even remotely interested in
vehicles...

Have another project jeep in mind... the ultimate....

late model cj type... the only thing worth saving is the frame.... a
aluminum body (4K).
a jeep 4.0 engine block, with a twist using a amc 4.2 head... turns the
4.0, to a 4.2.... and some other little things,,,

Unless the laws of physics have been "changed" by the new administration,
it
ain't gonna do that. The displacement (4.0 -> 4.2) requires one of two
things: a larger bore and piston or a longer stroke of the existing
piston.
Check the Jeep groups for the subject "stroker" - that's what you are
trying to accomplish. It does produce one helluva torque with the longer
stroke - wish I had one.

--
Will Honea




Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old   
Fuller Wrath
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 4x4 usefulness - 04-01-2009 , 12:26 AM



I always get a kick out of testosterone-deprived homies flatulating about "a
true 4x4."



<rainman1949 (AT) webtv (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
just read your last attempt.. seems to me u are way to interested in
testicals, to be driving a true 4x4....or even remotely interested in
vehicles...

Have another project jeep in mind... the ultimate....

late model cj type... the only thing worth saving is the frame.... a
aluminum body (4K).
a jeep 4.0 engine block, with a twist using a amc 4.2 head... turns the
4.0, to a 4.2.... and some other little things,,,




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.