![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
micrometer???? i bet u drive one of those smart cars... 2 seater and u also believe that democrats are for the workers too??? smart cars, democrats, global warming, taxes, user taxes, less unions and more illegals working for the democrats, and to think I drive oh nooooo... one of those dreaded big, 4x4 suvs.... simply unbelievable.... but i have been thinking of down grading my ride to a 94 transam.. 350, 6 speed.... (do u know what a manual transmission is, i bet u never heard of a clutch or a clutch pedal)... i think i will keep them both... summer car, and a winter car.... both belching gas guzzlers... love it..... the smell of rubber on the road..nothing like it... and speaking of carbon footprints,,, how about a twin motor, military jet holds 12 passengers.. (the ultimate suv). do u know that the speaker of the house has this military jet plane for her own use. She uses it to fly back and forth from ca to washington,and other places. She doesnt worry about her carbon footprint, and the suvs that demoract politicians drive, ohhhh the carbon foortprints...... the earth is doomed... i am not responsible for u not having any fun whle u are driving your two seater smart car, while politicians are driving and flying suvs. just kidding.... |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
that is the best u can do???? wow.. u better stop driving that little 2 seater car, before a bst passes u and the gust of wind will blow u rite off the road.... ... |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
#25
| |||
| |||
|
#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
just read your last attempt.. seems to me u are way to interested in testicals, to be driving a true 4x4....or even remotely interested in vehicles... Have another project jeep in mind... the ultimate.... late model cj type... the only thing worth saving is the frame.... a aluminum body (4K). a jeep 4.0 engine block, with a twist using a amc 4.2 head... turns the 4.0, to a 4.2.... and some other little things,,, |
#27
| |||
| |||
|
#28
| |||
| |||
|
#29
| |||
| |||
|
|
rainman1949 (AT) webtv (DOT) net wrote: just read your last attempt.. seems to me u are way to interested in testicals, to be driving a true 4x4....or even remotely interested in vehicles... Have another project jeep in mind... the ultimate.... late model cj type... the only thing worth saving is the frame.... a aluminum body (4K). a jeep 4.0 engine block, with a twist using a amc 4.2 head... turns the 4.0, to a 4.2.... and some other little things,,, Unless the laws of physics have been "changed" by the new administration, it ain't gonna do that. The displacement (4.0 -> 4.2) requires one of two things: a larger bore and piston or a longer stroke of the existing piston. Check the Jeep groups for the subject "stroker" - that's what you are trying to accomplish. It does produce one helluva torque with the longer stroke - wish I had one. -- Will Honea |
#30
| |||
| |||
|
|
just read your last attempt.. seems to me u are way to interested in testicals, to be driving a true 4x4....or even remotely interested in vehicles... Have another project jeep in mind... the ultimate.... late model cj type... the only thing worth saving is the frame.... a aluminum body (4K). a jeep 4.0 engine block, with a twist using a amc 4.2 head... turns the 4.0, to a 4.2.... and some other little things,,, |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |