AutosTalk Forums  

99 Burb Drive Train Shake Problem

4x4 Chevy/GMC Trucks 4x4 Chevy/GMC Trucks Discussions (alt.autos.4x4.chevy-trucks)


Discuss 99 Burb Drive Train Shake Problem in the 4x4 Chevy/GMC Trucks forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old   
Heatwave
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 99 Burb Drive Train Shake Problem - 09-04-2007 , 11:04 AM






In article <1188918762.537537.64880 (AT) 57g2000hsv (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
azwiley1 (AT) gmail (DOT) com says...

Quote:
What's the matter nonsense and Steve, you don't like it when some one
points out snotroll for what he is?
You tow need to realize just how dangerous (and useless) a LOT of his
information has been before you continue to defend him. Again, it is
not "about me" its about esuring the lurkers in here are aware. So,
if you don't like it or what I have to say, k/f me or ignore me, I
could care less.
I like his name, nonsense, totally fitting. Hence why I ignore the peon
as he already does his self in. If he doesn't like what we write then he
can killfile us. I will continue to set the record straight and I will
continue to demand that Snoball answer for his stupidity.

-----------------------------------
Snojob Follies:
SBJ: Dumb brake question
http://tinyurl.com/2ya3wo

SBJ: Front wheel bearings-2000 Blazer??
http://tinyurl.com/2j44zv
-----------------------------------

If the YellowSnoman wants to start improving his image he should start
by owning up to his rabid stupidity in the above threads...

"When I am clearly in error I will admit it
while others do not so they are never wrong
in their mind anyway." -Snoman (Oct 17 2006)

Clearly in error...



Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old   
azwiley1@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 99 Burb Drive Train Shake Problem - 09-04-2007 , 11:29 AM






On Sep 4, 8:20 am, nonsense <nonse... (AT) unsettled (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
azwil... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
On Sep 4, 1:30 am, nonsense <nonse... (AT) unsettled (DOT) com> wrote:

azwil... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

It seems there are a lot of lurkers who appreciate
such information. It's not "all about you".

If your ego is injured killfile the poster.- Hide quoted text -

Never once said or implied it was "aal about me" asshole.

snip

Displaying a petty little temper tantrum is making
it all about you.

Carry on then!

What's the matter nonsense and Steve, you don't like it when some one
points out snotroll for what he is?
You tow need to realize just how dangerous (and useless) a LOT of his
information has been before you continue to defend him. Again, it is
not "about me" its about esuring the lurkers in here are aware. So,
if you don't like it or what I have to say, k/f me or ignore me, I
could care less.

Oh you could, could you? :-)- Hide quoted text -

Care whether or not you ignore or k/f me? No I honestly do not.
I do care however about the fact that time and time again your idol
posts incorrect, dangerous and usless info that those unknowing and
unsuspecting "lurkers" can and/or may follow. I do care about
ensuring that no one is hurt or killed by such information.



Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old   
nonsense
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 99 Burb Drive Train Shake Problem - 09-04-2007 , 11:53 AM



azwiley1 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

Quote:
On Sep 4, 8:20 am, nonsense <nonse... (AT) unsettled (DOT) com> wrote:

azwil... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

On Sep 4, 1:30 am, nonsense <nonse... (AT) unsettled (DOT) com> wrote:

azwil... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

It seems there are a lot of lurkers who appreciate
such information. It's not "all about you".

If your ego is injured killfile the poster.- Hide quoted text -

Never once said or implied it was "aal about me" asshole.

snip

Displaying a petty little temper tantrum is making
it all about you.

Carry on then!

What's the matter nonsense and Steve, you don't like it when some one
points out snotroll for what he is?
You tow need to realize just how dangerous (and useless) a LOT of his
information has been before you continue to defend him. Again, it is
not "about me" its about esuring the lurkers in here are aware. So,
if you don't like it or what I have to say, k/f me or ignore me, I
could care less.

Oh you could, could you? :-)- Hide quoted text -



Care whether or not you ignore or k/f me? No I honestly do not.
Now try to figure out the logic involved in what
you wrote and my reply. If you can't, then none of
the rest of what you continue to write makes any
sense either.

Quote:
I do care however about the fact that time and time again your idol
posts incorrect, dangerous and usless info that those unknowing and
unsuspecting "lurkers" can and/or may follow.
I never addressed the technical content of his posts, and
I have no idols here. I worship the giant mothball,
don'tchano!

Quote:
I do care about
ensuring that no one is hurt or killed by such information.
Your lack of clear thinking and absence of critical
reading continues to be astonishing.

You might try posting your version of "correct" information
instead of simply flaming the guy and leaving the
lurkers with what may or may not be wrong information.

You do know that this stuff is all archived. So in the
future it is likely that someone who retrieves information
isn't going to be reading it in the threaded setting you're
participating in.

Buy I have to guess that you're hell bent on flaming
while making up excuses for your bad childish conduct.




Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old   
Dennis Mayer
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 99 Burb Drive Train Shake Problem - 09-04-2007 , 04:05 PM





nonsense wrote:
Quote:
azwiley1 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

On Sep 4, 8:20 am, nonsense <nonse... (AT) unsettled (DOT) com> wrote:

azwil... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

On Sep 4, 1:30 am, nonsense <nonse... (AT) unsettled (DOT) com> wrote:

azwil... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

It seems there are a lot of lurkers who appreciate
such information. It's not "all about you".

If your ego is injured killfile the poster.- Hide quoted text -

Never once said or implied it was "aal about me" asshole.

snip

Displaying a petty little temper tantrum is making
it all about you.

Carry on then!

What's the matter nonsense and Steve, you don't like it when some one
points out snotroll for what he is?
You tow need to realize just how dangerous (and useless) a LOT of his
information has been before you continue to defend him. Again, it is
not "about me" its about esuring the lurkers in here are aware. So,
if you don't like it or what I have to say, k/f me or ignore me, I
could care less.

Oh you could, could you? :-)- Hide quoted text -



Care whether or not you ignore or k/f me? No I honestly do not.

Now try to figure out the logic involved in what
you wrote and my reply. If you can't, then none of
the rest of what you continue to write makes any
sense either.

I do care however about the fact that time and time again your idol
posts incorrect, dangerous and usless info that those unknowing and
unsuspecting "lurkers" can and/or may follow.

I never addressed the technical content of his posts, and
I have no idols here. I worship the giant mothball,
don'tchano!

I do care about
ensuring that no one is hurt or killed by such information.

Your lack of clear thinking and absence of critical
reading continues to be astonishing.

You might try posting your version of "correct" information
instead of simply flaming the guy and leaving the
lurkers with what may or may not be wrong information.

You do know that this stuff is all archived. So in the
future it is likely that someone who retrieves information
isn't going to be reading it in the threaded setting you're
participating in.

Buy I have to guess that you're hell bent on flaming
while making up excuses for your bad childish conduct.


If the drive shaft is 'the' possible problem area,

again consider greasing the drive shaft slip spline joint.

Under load & dry, the 00 & 01 GM joint has trouble sliding

because it does not have the newer nickel spline plating.


Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old   
nonsense
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 99 Burb Drive Train Shake Problem - 09-04-2007 , 05:40 PM



Dennis Mayer wrote:
Quote:
nonsense wrote:

azwiley1 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:


On Sep 4, 8:20 am, nonsense <nonse... (AT) unsettled (DOT) com> wrote:


azwil... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:


On Sep 4, 1:30 am, nonsense <nonse... (AT) unsettled (DOT) com> wrote:

azwil... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

It seems there are a lot of lurkers who appreciate
such information. It's not "all about you".

If your ego is injured killfile the poster.- Hide quoted text -

Never once said or implied it was "aal about me" asshole.

snip

Displaying a petty little temper tantrum is making
it all about you.

Carry on then!

What's the matter nonsense and Steve, you don't like it when some one
points out snotroll for what he is?
You tow need to realize just how dangerous (and useless) a LOT of his
information has been before you continue to defend him. Again, it is
not "about me" its about esuring the lurkers in here are aware. So,
if you don't like it or what I have to say, k/f me or ignore me, I
could care less.

Oh you could, could you? :-)- Hide quoted text -



Care whether or not you ignore or k/f me? No I honestly do not.

Now try to figure out the logic involved in what
you wrote and my reply. If you can't, then none of
the rest of what you continue to write makes any
sense either.


I do care however about the fact that time and time again your idol
posts incorrect, dangerous and usless info that those unknowing and
unsuspecting "lurkers" can and/or may follow.

I never addressed the technical content of his posts, and
I have no idols here. I worship the giant mothball,
don'tchano!


I do care about
ensuring that no one is hurt or killed by such information.

Your lack of clear thinking and absence of critical
reading continues to be astonishing.

You might try posting your version of "correct" information
instead of simply flaming the guy and leaving the
lurkers with what may or may not be wrong information.

You do know that this stuff is all archived. So in the
future it is likely that someone who retrieves information
isn't going to be reading it in the threaded setting you're
participating in.

Buy I have to guess that you're hell bent on flaming
while making up excuses for your bad childish conduct.




If the drive shaft is 'the' possible problem area,

again consider greasing the drive shaft slip spline joint.

Under load & dry, the 00 & 01 GM joint has trouble sliding

because it does not have the newer nickel spline plating.
To go a step beyond, I've once experienced a
rather worn spline.





Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old   
Mo Man
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 99 Burb Drive Train Shake Problem - 09-04-2007 , 07:08 PM



A brand new drive shaft and spline was installed 7 months ago which fixed a
different and longstanding
vibration problem. The drive shaft vibration was masking this engine
vibration. Again, I think the key symptom
here is the service engine code of '5th cylinder misfire'. Will try some of
the previous diagnostic techniques that
were listed in previous posts about trouble shooting a sticky valve.

Mike

"Dennis Mayer" <Polaris1 (AT) execpc (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

nonsense wrote:

azwiley1 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

On Sep 4, 8:20 am, nonsense <nonse... (AT) unsettled (DOT) com> wrote:

azwil... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

On Sep 4, 1:30 am, nonsense <nonse... (AT) unsettled (DOT) com> wrote:

azwil... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

It seems there are a lot of lurkers who appreciate
such information. It's not "all about you".

If your ego is injured killfile the poster.- Hide quoted text -

Never once said or implied it was "aal about me" asshole.

snip

Displaying a petty little temper tantrum is making
it all about you.

Carry on then!

What's the matter nonsense and Steve, you don't like it when some one
points out snotroll for what he is?
You tow need to realize just how dangerous (and useless) a LOT of his
information has been before you continue to defend him. Again, it is
not "about me" its about esuring the lurkers in here are aware. So,
if you don't like it or what I have to say, k/f me or ignore me, I
could care less.

Oh you could, could you? :-)- Hide quoted text -



Care whether or not you ignore or k/f me? No I honestly do not.

Now try to figure out the logic involved in what
you wrote and my reply. If you can't, then none of
the rest of what you continue to write makes any
sense either.

I do care however about the fact that time and time again your idol
posts incorrect, dangerous and usless info that those unknowing and
unsuspecting "lurkers" can and/or may follow.

I never addressed the technical content of his posts, and
I have no idols here. I worship the giant mothball,
don'tchano!

I do care about
ensuring that no one is hurt or killed by such information.

Your lack of clear thinking and absence of critical
reading continues to be astonishing.

You might try posting your version of "correct" information
instead of simply flaming the guy and leaving the
lurkers with what may or may not be wrong information.

You do know that this stuff is all archived. So in the
future it is likely that someone who retrieves information
isn't going to be reading it in the threaded setting you're
participating in.

Buy I have to guess that you're hell bent on flaming
while making up excuses for your bad childish conduct.



If the drive shaft is 'the' possible problem area,

again consider greasing the drive shaft slip spline joint.

Under load & dry, the 00 & 01 GM joint has trouble sliding

because it does not have the newer nickel spline plating.



Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old   
Mo Man
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 99 Burb Drive Train Shake Problem - 09-06-2007 , 04:14 PM



Is this diagnosis with a labscope and vacuum transducer something I could
do, or
should I ask a garage to do it. I have access to an oscilliscope, if that is
the same as a
labscope, and could alsways buy a vacuum transducer. Just need to know what
to hook
it up too and what to look for.

Thanks.
Mike
"aarcuda69062" <nonelson (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
In article <1RTCi.2$co7.1 (AT) newsfe06 (DOT) lga>,
" Mo Man" <mo_man (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote:

The Dealership is adamant that the transmission is not causing the
shake. I
have the
trailer package with the 3.73 gear ratio so the OD doesn't really strain
at
all.
Code the service code reading of 5th cylinder missfire be caused by a
sticky
valve?

Yes, a sticking valve could cause a missfire in cylinder #5.
Easy 5 minute diagnosis with a labscope and a vacuum transducer.

More common would be failing intake manifold gaskets, a plugged
injector or crossfiring in the distributor cap.



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.