![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||||||
| |||||||
|
|
Q1 - MAFs: I can relate to the "scalded cat / bus" post the other day and I have read the "dirty or faulty MAF" answer to so many similar posts that I presume this is also my problem, but not being particularly mechanically confident... MAF = Mass Air Flow. Clearly the engine needs the right amount of air to go with the petrol, so a sensor is used to detect/control it. Right? |
|
Does the following sound like a duff / dirty MAF: 156 2.0JTS. At low revs - around 2000, when I accellerate not necessarily hard, there is sometimes a loss in engine power as if the fuel has been cut off for a half second. When I back off on the power and then re-apply it gently, the power comes back on as normal. The computer then complains about engine control failure - go to dealer, but I'm used to this message now and no longer panic! Doesn't happen when revs are over about 3000. |
|
Are MAFs easy to locate and clean or perhaps cheap/easy to replace? |
| Q2 - Brakes: To upgrade the brakes on my 156, is it a simple matter of installing larger, perhaps ventillated discs and appropriate pads, or is there much more to it? |
| Q3 - Turbo / Supercharger: Installing a turbo or supercharger to a 156 2.0JTS: expensive or not? Would it require new, stronger parts in the engine - block/pistons/head etc? |
|
What impact on insurance - any experience out there? |

| Thanks again guys, GT |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
GT wrote: Q1 - MAFs: I can relate to the "scalded cat / bus" post the other day and I have read the "dirty or faulty MAF" answer to so many similar posts that I presume this is also my problem, but not being particularly mechanically confident... MAF = Mass Air Flow. Clearly the engine needs the right amount of air to go with the petrol, so a sensor is used to detect/control it. Right? Wrong way round. It needs the correct amount of petrol to match the amount of air that the engine is drawing in. The MAF measures the mass of the incoming air, and the ECU works out how long to keep the injectors open to deliver the correct amount of fuel to provide the correct air / fuel mix. Does the following sound like a duff / dirty MAF: 156 2.0JTS. At low revs - around 2000, when I accellerate not necessarily hard, there is sometimes a loss in engine power as if the fuel has been cut off for a half second. When I back off on the power and then re-apply it gently, the power comes back on as normal. The computer then complains about engine control failure - go to dealer, but I'm used to this message now and no longer panic! Doesn't happen when revs are over about 3000. Sounds more like throttle sensor failure to me. Does the JTS use drive by wire throttle I wonder? I've not heard of MAF failure causing ECU lights. I know from experience that TPS failure can. |
|
Are MAFs easy to locate and clean or perhaps cheap/easy to replace? Yes and moderately. Best go for an original not a cheapo ebay knock off. But I'm pretty damned sure that if your MAF is bust, it's not your main issue. Q2 - Brakes: To upgrade the brakes on my 156, is it a simple matter of installing larger, perhaps ventillated discs and appropriate pads, or is there much more to it? Define 'upgrade'. What problem are you getting? Certain values of larger won't fit. ICBW as well, but the pad area is rather more important than the disc, so you'd need bigger / more calipers as well. |
|
You could fit some 'better' pads (EBC green stuff for example) but they can be exciting when cold, and won't solve, again for example a spongey pedal or a leaking servo. Need more symptoms really. Q3 - Turbo / Supercharger: Installing a turbo or supercharger to a 156 2.0JTS: expensive or not? Would it require new, stronger parts in the engine - block/pistons/head etc? Fitting a turbo / super to virtually any engine is *very* expensive. Last time one was dangled in front of my 116 it was IRO £1100 *just for the turbo* And the 12V V6 is pretty bomb proof, it would only have needed inlet piping, exhaust piping and a new ECU. I really doubt that a JTS would need less than pistons, crank, cons, ECU and the plumbing. Get a bigger engined car. Or are you, IIRC, in Holland? What impact on insurance - any experience out there? Hideous ![]() Thanks again guys, GT -- Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3 Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply) 116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS 156 V6 2.5 S2 Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see. www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk |
#4
| ||||||
| ||||||
|
|
It is a drive by wire throttle, so that makes sense. Why would this only happen at low revs tho? |
|
Is there some way of testing / resetting the throttle sensor without plugging the car into a laptop. I have the PC knowhow, but no cables or diag software. Incidentally, where is the connector for plugging into diag software - in the cabin somewhere I presume? |
|
Are MAFs easy to locate and clean or perhaps cheap/easy to replace? Yes and moderately. Best go for an original not a cheapo ebay knock off. But I'm pretty damned sure that if your MAF is bust, it's not your main issue. Q2 - Brakes: To upgrade the brakes on my 156, is it a simple matter of installing larger, perhaps ventillated discs and appropriate pads, or is there much more to it? Define 'upgrade'. What problem are you getting? Certain values of larger won't fit. ICBW as well, but the pad area is rather more important than the disc, so you'd need bigger / more calipers as well. My question about brakes was for 2 reasons. Firstly, the brakes are a little spongey, but I they seem to stop the car OK. Sounds like a contradiction, but they are nowhere near as sharp as SHMBOs little fiesta. |


|
I realise it is a smaller, lighter car, but the brakes on that feel much tighter and sharper than mine. Secondly, if I upgrade the power somehow, then I thought that better brakes would be advisable. |
|
However, by the sounds of it, I won't be upgrading the power so perhaps I'll just leave well alone! Oh and I'm in Fife by the way. I know someone in here is Dutch, but I can't remember who! |
|
Thanks for the advice. |

#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Q3 - Turbo / Supercharger: Installing a turbo or supercharger to a 156 2.0JTS: expensive or not? Would it require new, stronger parts in the engine - block/pistons/head etc? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
GT <ContactGT_rem_ove_ (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: Q3 - Turbo / Supercharger: Installing a turbo or supercharger to a 156 2.0JTS: expensive or not? Would it require new, stronger parts in the engine - block/pistons/head etc? It would be cheaper to sell it and buy a GTA. JTS lumps were a massive step backwards over the old TSparks in many ways, so they're not an engine I'd choose to start with anyway. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
"SteveH" <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:1j6m17s.gb1j2uwgrl8oN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk... GT <ContactGT_rem_ove_ (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: Q3 - Turbo / Supercharger: Installing a turbo or supercharger to a 156 2.0JTS: expensive or not? Would it require new, stronger parts in the engine - block/pistons/head etc? It would be cheaper to sell it and buy a GTA. JTS lumps were a massive step backwards over the old TSparks in many ways, so they're not an engine I'd choose to start with anyway. Statistics disagree with that - the 2.0 JTS has 10% more power and is more fuel efficient then the 2.0TS. Besides they have the words "Jet Thrust" in the name, therefore they must be better! Why do you say they are a step backward? |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
europe.news.astraweb.com <GT> wrote: "SteveH" <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:1j6m17s.gb1j2uwgrl8oN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk... GT <ContactGT_rem_ove_ (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: Q3 - Turbo / Supercharger: Installing a turbo or supercharger to a 156 2.0JTS: expensive or not? Would it require new, stronger parts in the engine - block/pistons/head etc? It would be cheaper to sell it and buy a GTA. JTS lumps were a massive step backwards over the old TSparks in many ways, so they're not an engine I'd choose to start with anyway. Statistics disagree with that - the 2.0 JTS has 10% more power and is more fuel efficient then the 2.0TS. Besides they have the words "Jet Thrust" in the name, therefore they must be better! Why do you say they are a step backward? Very few JTS engines are delivering the full 165bhp they should be delivering - and finding the elusive missing bhp is proving to be a big issue. They are also, allegedly more unreliable than the TSpark. Problems include incorrectly profiled cams, unsuitable fuel maps and massive coking of the cylinder head - caused by the above. There have also been several reports of problems with the injectors. Most JTS engines that have been dyno tested are putting out less than 150bhp, and in some cases as little as 125bhp. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
No idea what bhp its putting out tho! I know all cars lose power over time and its 7 years old now and still going strong. The original exhaust is ready to fall off, but nothing else is wrong! |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
"GT" <ContactGT_rem_ove_ (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:00f316a5$0$17202$c3e8da3 (AT) news (DOT) astraweb.com... No idea what bhp its putting out tho! I know all cars lose power over time and its 7 years old now and still going strong. The original exhaust is ready to fall off, but nothing else is wrong! That's how Alfas maintain the power:weight ratio; as the engine gets tired more bits of the car fall off. Certainly this was true for our '82 Alfasud 1.5Ti |

![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |