![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:35:26 +0100, Catman catman (AT) rustcuore-sportivo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Tell you this much. My SWMBO is not *at all* interested in how many cupholders 'her' 147 has. Far more does it have leather, have the cambelts been done, and properly, and when, how many miles, is it a 2l 3 door. You'll not be wanting a swap then? ;-) |

#42
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:35:26 +0100, Catman catman (AT) rustcuore-sportivo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Tell you this much. My SWMBO is not *at all* interested in how many cupholders 'her' 147 has. Far more does it have leather, have the cambelts been done, and properly, and when, how many miles, is it a 2l 3 door. You'll not be wanting a swap then? ;-) |
#43
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <t46ia55i2q1ccg9q5336cnkt7s2247o446 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, webnewsgroup (AT) nospamthanks (DOT) hotmail.com says... On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:35:26 +0100, Catman catman (AT) rustcuore-sportivo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Tell you this much. My SWMBO is not *at all* interested in how many cupholders 'her' 147 has. Far more does it have leather, have the cambelts been done, and properly, and when, how many miles, is it a 2l 3 door. You'll not be wanting a swap then? ;-) SWMBO or the 147? |
#44
| |||
| |||
|
|
Zathras wrote: On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:35:26 +0100, Catman catman (AT) rustcuore-sportivo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Tell you this much. My SWMBO is not *at all* interested in how many cupholders 'her' 147 has. Far more does it have leather, have the cambelts been done, and properly, and when, how many miles, is it a 2l 3 door. You'll not be wanting a swap then? ;-) Dunno, is she fit? ![]() |
#45
| |||
| |||
|
|
Halmyre wrote: In article <t46ia55i2q1ccg9q5336cnkt7s2247o446 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, webnewsgroup (AT) nospamthanks (DOT) hotmail.com says... On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:35:26 +0100, Catman catman (AT) rustcuore-sportivo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Tell you this much. My SWMBO is not *at all* interested in how many cupholders 'her' 147 has. Far more does it have leather, have the cambelts been done, and properly, and when, how many miles, is it a 2l 3 door. You'll not be wanting a swap then? ;-) SWMBO or the 147? SWMBO obviously. /me is not that keen on the 147 TBH |
#46
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:21:37 +0100, Catman catman (AT) rustcuore-sportivo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Halmyre wrote: In article <t46ia55i2q1ccg9q5336cnkt7s2247o446 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, webnewsgroup (AT) nospamthanks (DOT) hotmail.com says... On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:35:26 +0100, Catman catman (AT) rustcuore-sportivo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Tell you this much. My SWMBO is not *at all* interested in how many cupholders 'her' 147 has. Far more does it have leather, have the cambelts been done, and properly, and when, how many miles, is it a 2l 3 door. You'll not be wanting a swap then? ;-) SWMBO or the 147? SWMBO obviously. /me is not that keen on the 147 TBH How about a 147 TBI? |
|
Alfa some day? |
#47
| |||
| |||
|
|
How about a 147 TBI? TBI? |
|
I wonder if they'll fit the 1750 into the smaller Alfa some day? I remain totally unconvinced by that engine. Obviously I've not driven one, but it's not got enough cylinders or CC, is my gut feel. |
#48
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:13:51 +0100, Catman catman (AT) rustcuore-sportivo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: How about a 147 TBI? TBI? Oh do keep up old boy! ;-) Turbo Benzina..er..oh..maybe Injection? Anyway, the new 1750 engine. |

|
I wonder if they'll fit the 1750 into the smaller Alfa some day? I remain totally unconvinced by that engine. Obviously I've not driven one, but it's not got enough cylinders or CC, is my gut feel. I've glimpsed at a couple of 159 TBI reviews and while the engine is a good performer (with light weight [saves 100kg vs V6] allied to 200hp at 5000 rpm and 236 lbft at 1400 rpm) it's not got any Alfa character they say. The paper figures suggest the engine should be a cracker - hugely flexible with a massive power band. If Alfa have left any turbo lag in it they should be shot!! I don't think it's very high revving though. Unfortunately it's only in the lardy 159 at the moment and that seems to need about 200hp to get under 8.5s to 60!! :-( In reality, 0-62mph at 7.7s is still slower than my personal benchmark - a diesel Chrysler 300C. If it lost a second, it would get my thumbs up. |
#49
| |||
| |||
|
|
In the subject of engines, SMWBO is in my car today, as her hire car finished, and we've not had a chance to spend the insurance cheque yet. Bloody hell, it sounds great from *outside*. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |