![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm sure Microsoft will come running to our aid with a relatively cheap fix if any company goes under. Andi. "Larry" <none (AT) none (DOT) com> wrote in message news:8H1Gf.162391$oG.68961 (AT) dukeread02 (DOT) .. So, with these phone-home protection systems... What happens if the developer goes under and the servers aren't home any more. Anyone thought of that? That is my primary problem with "Activation" systems, be it software or digital music. -Larry "Andrew MacPherson" <andrew.mcp (AT) DELETETHISdsl (DOT) pipex.com> wrote in message news:memo.20060207115754.976A (AT) address_disguised (DOT) address_disguised... magma at comcast dot net (HockeyTownUSA) wrote: Oh CRAP! I think we simply have to get used to developers protecting their work like this. I don't like it, but I love GTL, so I'm living with it and haven't -- so far -- noticed any problems associated with it. The Starforce on LOMAC 1.1 is worse, because you only get a limited number of installations. Ok, it's 15 these days, with more if you ask nicely, I believe. But that bothers me *far* more than the protection on GTL. Andrew McP |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
What happens if the developer goes under and the servers aren't home any more. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
Makes re-install a breeze and unlimited. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
naman (AT) nospam (DOT) pacbell.net (Mitch_A) wrote: Makes re-install a breeze and unlimited. Not strictly true. The registry backup only works if your hardware stays the same. Any changes and Starforce has to re-authenticate. Andrew McP |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
none (AT) none (DOT) com (Larry) wrote: What happens if the developer goes under and the servers aren't home any more. I absolutely agree it's a nasty system. But what's the choice here and now? We either don't buy the software and miss the fun, or we swallow the bitter pill. I'm too old to sit and wait for an ideal world. :-) Andrew McP |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
If you buy the cdrom version it has no such limitations. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
It will happen, and I think it will be good for consumers when it does. Congress will meet. Senators will discuss over beer. Laws will be written protecting the consumer. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
Larry wrote: It will happen, and I think it will be good for consumers when it does. Congress will meet. Senators will discuss over beer. Laws will be written protecting the consumer. Somehow I find no comfort in this at all. Seldom does Congress do anything that doesn't end up with the average guy taking it up the ass. Don McCorkle www.lp.org |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
It's not their software to fix. This has already happened once to users of a certain DVD copy program. One day, their paid-for product ceased to install if I remember correctly because the company shut down. When you think about it, this is REALLY serious with people spending thousands on downloaded music. If it ever happened, even ONCE, the ripple through the music download industry would be tidal-wave in effect. I think we will see it happen eventually. And Microsoft still hasn't officially stated what they are going to do with XP activations when it goes off support. -Larry "Andi Cole" <andi (AT) eloc00 (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:43e8e2a1$0$82665$ed2619ec (AT) ptn-nntp-reader03 (DOT) plus.net... I'm sure Microsoft will come running to our aid with a relatively cheap fix if any company goes under. Andi. "Larry" <none (AT) none (DOT) com> wrote in message news:8H1Gf.162391$oG.68961 (AT) dukeread02 (DOT) .. So, with these phone-home protection systems... What happens if the developer goes under and the servers aren't home any more. Anyone thought of that? That is my primary problem with "Activation" systems, be it software or digital music. -Larry "Andrew MacPherson" <andrew.mcp (AT) DELETETHISdsl (DOT) pipex.com> wrote in message news:memo.20060207115754.976A (AT) address_disguised (DOT) address_disguised... magma at comcast dot net (HockeyTownUSA) wrote: Oh CRAP! I think we simply have to get used to developers protecting their work like this. I don't like it, but I love GTL, so I'm living with it and haven't -- so far -- noticed any problems associated with it. The Starforce on LOMAC 1.1 is worse, because you only get a limited number of installations. Ok, it's 15 these days, with more if you ask nicely, I believe. But that bothers me *far* more than the protection on GTL. Andrew McP |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 15:55:54 -0500, Larry wrote: When you think about it, this is REALLY serious with people spending thousands on downloaded music. If it ever happened, even ONCE, the ripple through the music download industry would be tidal-wave in effect. I think the only viable option is open, non-proprietary music formats. I refuse to purchase music online from a service that won't allow me to listen to the titles on the machine and operating system of *my* choice. Cheers, uwe -- GPG Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |