![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
What you fail to consider is that there has to be an advantage to switching, justifying the cost, generally speaking. The jump from Windows 98 (skipping that awful thing in between) to XP was enormous; the jump from XP to Vista appears to be much smaller. So actually the comment is not "daft", as you call it. Your failure to see the difference of the jump between Windows 98 to XP and that between XP and Vista is what I might consider a "daft" assessment. Alanb |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
I know vista just came out but was wondering if anyone has got it and tried to run GPL under the new operating system. If so sure would like to know if it works ![]() Thanks for any info MILO |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 08:48:25 -0500, "Alan Bernardo" <alan.bernardo (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: "GaryP" <gary (AT) forgetaboutit (DOT) com> wrote in message news:b4o3s2pph1e62e6qh8suda6c4tn0t0pg5l (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... That's almost funny... look back a MS OS or two, then add in Flight sims and shooters.. GP On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:42:11 GMT, "Jan Verschueren" jan.verschuerenNO (AT) SPAMtelenet (DOT) be> wrote: Name one reason why anyone who's serious about racing sims in general would want to upgrade? Jan. =--- Currently, right now, I see no reason to go to Vista. That may change as new games are released. Your comment about "looking back" makes little sense. The jump from Windows 95 or 98 to XP is a whole lot different than jumping from XP to Vista. Even besides this, I don't understand your point. If the current games-- GPL, for instance-- work on XP, what's the advantage of going to Vista, besides the rather exorbitant $200 price tag for the complete version? To go to Vista just to go to Vista and be cool is no reason. Unless there is a decent increase in performance when running Vista and a game (or racing sim)-- if that's all you do is play games or other small stuff-- then is there a reason to make the switch? Alanb |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
What you fail to consider is that there has to be an advantage to switching, justifying the cost, generally speaking. The jump from Windows 98 (skipping that awful thing in between) to XP was enormous; the jump from XP to Vista appears to be much smaller. So actually the comment is not "daft", as you call it. Your failure to see the difference of the jump between Windows 98 to XP and that between XP and Vista is what I might consider a "daft" assessment. Alanb Yep, much the same comments as 98 > XP, I'm going Vista tomorrow and I'd put a big lump of money on it that most people on here will be there within 3 - 4 months as hardware and driver support develops and of course grinds to a halt for XP...that's the world we live in. I'll be happy to report back on performance with GPL (if it works - but if it doesn't I won't take long before a fix is developed) |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
Vista update#3... GPL was the only game that I have installed since switch/upgrading XP on this old machine, to VISTA... As I am sure, I checked in the sidewinder profiler to make sure it all worked in Vista - RC1, I had not actually looked yet. I I just raced nascar and GTlegends and everythings was like I thought it should be... in otherwords, I just tried the games and everything was still working. I had high hopes... I was ready and happy. well that computer I posted about that would NOT run nascar racing even when I had just XP on here, with vista on here it does work, and like I tell you SIDEWINDER USERS below... I thought I had lucked out having it work in Vista as long as it was installed before uupgrading to Vista, least it had with RC1, or maybe ??? Well I installed GPL 2004 demo, for me and Milo's sake (before I quit this TEST and returned my kids PC back to him) and GPL of course... had no idea about my wheel, so I had a minute and since couldn't calibrate in game like I thought I should have. I exited GPLdemo, and opened the Sidewinder software, SO FYI, well it aint like it used to be, all I can do in there is calibrate, and I dont see ANYTHING of the Sidwinder app you used to see to calibrate, test and save profiles, nor the FF & combo or seperate pedals like those of us are used to that have Sidewinder USB wheels. all i really have is generic joystic settings, Luckily since I had already seperated the pedals back in XP and set the FF settings to my liking, they are seperated and worked after having Vista calibrate like you would a generic joystic, with 3 axes. I hope to do more investigating, and I am going to post this to RAS, so but with XP machine (plowboy I think I have). So, no I dont know where I stand now. might see later if DXtweak lets me do anything, like combine and or seperate pedals and stuff, otherwise I am done with Vista for now I guess. I cannot afford 200 for the fuggin OS and 300 (ok 250 plus ship for the g2) gosh dangit! I hate this. I guess putting in a swap drive cradle, and swapping xp & vista is my only choices now. later all. Milo Johnson wrote: I know vista just came out but was wondering if anyone has got it and tried to run GPL under the new operating system. If so sure would like to know if it works ![]() Thanks for any info MILO |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
Plowboy has brought this to us : Vista update#3... GPL was the only game that I have installed since switch/upgrading XP on this old machine, to VISTA... As I am sure, I checked in the sidewinder profiler to make sure it all worked in Vista - RC1, I had SNIP |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
Ooops my bad, I omitted that (taking myself off topic I guess) yeah the GPL2004 demo ran fine! Vintook wrote: Plowboy has brought this to us : Vista update#3... GPL was the only game that I have installed since switch/upgrading XP on this old machine, to VISTA... As I am sure, I checked in the sidewinder profiler to make sure it all worked in Vista - RC1, I had SNIP |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
MC: What you fail to consider is that there has to be an advantage to switching, justifying the cost, generally speaking. The jump from Windows 98 (skipping that awful thing in between) to XP was enormous; the jump from XP to Vista appears to be much smaller. So actually the comment is not "daft", as you call it. Your failure to see the difference of the jump between Windows 98 to XP and that between XP and Vista is what I might consider a "daft" assessment. Alanb Yep, much the same comments as 98 > XP, I'm going Vista tomorrow and I'd put a big lump of money on it that most people on here will be there within 3 - 4 months as hardware and driver support develops and of course grinds to a halt for XP...that's the world we live in. I'll be happy to report back on performance with GPL (if it works - but if it doesn't I won't take long before a fix is developed) Since a lot of people with less experience is reading this, lets give them some sensible advice. And this would be something like this: Whether it works good or bad with this or that game (simulation), wait for some six months till bugs are fixed, and drivers updated. To this I could add: ...then you buy a new machine (with Vista on it), so that your new beutiful game (which will be issued just at that moment, traditionaly by Kaemmer) works with 36fps with all the flashy stuff on. -- Mario |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
For most of us, waiting 3 months minimum will be a very smart thing. With Aero and Glass (the nifty eyecandy part of vista desktop and stuff) the performance will not be as snappy as XP, with most machines on equal. Plus I am finding some obscure device troubles with Vista, and by device troubles I mean if the device (like camera) had its own way of doing things, and you liked it that way, Vista doesn't. AFAIK we were not going to be able to install GTlegends on Vista, you had to have already installed it I believe for it to work (which I had)... This i will check before I quit messing with Vista this week. As you read above, I wont do vista now, because I'll have to buy a wheel, and I would only settle for a g2, even though I would rather get an ecci, lol. I will know more later this week as I try a clean install of vista on my boy's machine hopefully tuesday or so, I have league races tonight (nascar) and thurs (ORR). I got screwed out of my weekend of plans to muk with vista, other things went on... I only have 4 games that I mess with: rFactor (mainly for the ORR trucks) Nascar 2003 GTlegends <unsure since I did upgrade of system that had this already on it However I have read in several places that Vista will NOT allow starforce to be installed, maybe this was an older iteration that the reviewers were talking about, than starforce on GTL? GPL I had, was pretty updated when I kinda quit playing it.. I would love to have GTR2 but I dont, Im holding out for GTL2 :-) Oh I guess I still have my paid for ability to install LFS, but havent installed it since day 1, of the first release when we had to pay, so I dont even know if it would be worth installing without forking out more money? A big issue rearing its head I been reading is Budget based computers with budget memory that runs fine in XP, wont run without BSD's on Vista. So some will have 2gigs of memory that will not work in Vista, you can find out before hand with this util... http://oca.microsoft.com/en/windiag.asp this is a dos like util to check your memory and you need a floppy or bootable CD or Flash memory stick works good too it will not run in windows.. PS you can fresh install Vista, you just instal it 2 times, once without a key, and then again giving it your CD key... BUT FYI, now my XP to Vista upgrade took 2-3 hours (under 1 gig of memory might account for that?) so this should and would double it as far as I know and read. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |