AutosTalk Forums  

2001 BMW 330ci incident with sales man

BMW BMW General Discussions (alt.autos.bmw)


Discuss 2001 BMW 330ci incident with sales man in the BMW forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old   
Fred W.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001 BMW 330ci incident with sales man - 03-05-2004 , 09:19 AM







"Dave Plowman" <dave.sound (AT) argonet (DOT) co.uk> wrote


Quote:
Then if this was the case, no one would bother with HID lights?

Quote:
Proper HID lamps are not 'blue' - they are closer to daylight than
tungsten. They may appear blue compared to tungsten, but that's not the
same thing.
I thing drivers in the US that have experienced both the DOT halogens and
the US version of HID Xenons would opt to keep the $1000 and go with the
halogens, *unless* they just want to have the brighter, whiter (and yes they
appear blue when viewed from an indirect angle) appearance of the Xenons.

The US version of BMW Xenons that I have seen is not self leveling, but has
the sharper cut-off of european style headlamps. The DOT halogen lamps do
not have the sharp cut-off, so even though they are more blinding to other
drivers, provide a better view down the road on low beam.

Quote:
Probably what you're trying to say is that *US* tungsten dip beam patterns
reach further, due to not having a sharp cut off. Or I hope so, because if
you compare the illumination with the same beam pattern, the tungsten
lights have an inferior output anywhere you care to measure it.
You are correct there. I'm saying the cost of this option is not worth
paying since you get less area of illumination. Whether I am blinding an
oncoming driver with my properly adjusted DOT lights is not my concern since
probably 90% of the cars on the road *over here* also have this type of
headlamp.

Quote:
It was an opinion, based on my experience, which you do not have to
agree with.

Perhaps your experience includes poorly adjusted lights.
I don't think so. I know how to properly adjust headlights, thanks.

-Fred W




Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old   
Mike Hall
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001 BMW 330ci incident with sales man - 03-05-2004 , 09:32 AM







"Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam myrealbox.com> wrote

Quote:
"Dave Plowman" <dave.sound (AT) argonet (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:4c8ad4fac3dave.sound (AT) argonet (DOT) co.uk...

Then if this was the case, no one would bother with HID lights?


Proper HID lamps are not 'blue' - they are closer to daylight than
tungsten. They may appear blue compared to tungsten, but that's not the
same thing.

I thing drivers in the US that have experienced both the DOT halogens and
the US version of HID Xenons would opt to keep the $1000 and go with the
halogens, *unless* they just want to have the brighter, whiter (and yes
they
appear blue when viewed from an indirect angle) appearance of the Xenons.

The US version of BMW Xenons that I have seen is not self leveling, but
has
the sharper cut-off of european style headlamps. The DOT halogen lamps do
not have the sharp cut-off, so even though they are more blinding to other
drivers, provide a better view down the road on low beam.

Probably what you're trying to say is that *US* tungsten dip beam
patterns
reach further, due to not having a sharp cut off. Or I hope so, because
if
you compare the illumination with the same beam pattern, the tungsten
lights have an inferior output anywhere you care to measure it.

You are correct there. I'm saying the cost of this option is not worth
paying since you get less area of illumination. Whether I am blinding an
oncoming driver with my properly adjusted DOT lights is not my concern
since
probably 90% of the cars on the road *over here* also have this type of
headlamp.


It was an opinion, based on my experience, which you do not have to
agree with.

Perhaps your experience includes poorly adjusted lights.

I don't think so. I know how to properly adjust headlights, thanks.

-Fred W

DOT headlights on low beam are not good.. they spray light in all
directions, upways being one of them so that overhead road signs can be
read.. Euro lights place a well defined beam spread where you really need
it, and they reduce glare to oncoming drivers.. in time, I will change the
headlights on my Jeep GC to Euro style..




Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old   
Fred W.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001 BMW 330ci incident with sales man - 03-05-2004 , 09:46 AM




"Mike Hall" <mike.hall.mail (AT) sympatico (DOT) ca> wrote

Quote:
DOT headlights on low beam are not good.. they spray light in all
directions, upways being one of them so that overhead road signs can be
read.. Euro lights place a well defined beam spread where you really need
it, and they reduce glare to oncoming drivers.. in time, I will change the
headlights on my Jeep GC to Euro style..


If you say so... One place the euro cut-off, non-leveling headlight beams
are particularly bothersome is in driving the back roads around here (New
Hampshire). The roads here are seldom level with all sorts of small (and
larger) hills to contend with. The only flat roads are the highways, and
you hardly even need headlights on those. When descending a hill with sharp
cut-off beams you can't see sh*t unless you put on high beams.

But, too each his own...

-Fred W




Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old   
maxima1
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001 BMW 330ci incident with sales man - 03-05-2004 , 09:59 AM



The problem is that
Quote:
the light pattern (in the US version at least) for Xenon lights is such
that, although they may put out more lumens, the area that they illuminate
is inferior to what you get with properly adjusted regulat DOT halogens.

I agree with you. The Xenons on my 528i do not extend very far out and
I tend to need my brights alot when cruising at night at 70-80 mph
just to see where I'm going. Fine around town, but not too great on
the open winding road.

The H4 Philips Vision bulbs (halogens) that I put in my 2K1 Maxima
work fantastic and are definitely better than the Xenons in my 528.

Matthew


Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old   
fbloogyudsr
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001 BMW 330ci incident with sales man - 03-05-2004 , 10:00 AM



"Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam myrealbox.com> wrote
Quote:
"Dave Plowman" <dave.sound (AT) argonet (DOT) co.uk> wrote
Then if this was the case, no one would bother with HID lights?

I thing drivers in the US that have experienced both the DOT halogens and
the US version of HID Xenons would opt to keep the $1000 and go with the
halogens, *unless* they just want to have the brighter, whiter (and yes
they
appear blue when viewed from an indirect angle) appearance of the Xenons.
Xenon Headlights are a $500 option - at least on my '01; might be more
for the adaptive on newer vehicles. There is substantially more
illumination
to the sides than with the halogen lights.

Quote:
The US version of BMW Xenons that I have seen is not self leveling, but
has
the sharper cut-off of european style headlamps. The DOT halogen lamps do
not have the sharp cut-off, so even though they are more blinding to other
drivers, provide a better view down the road on low beam.
All BMWs with Xenon lights sold in the US have self-leveling. Not all
have headlight washers, however.

Floyd '01 330xi



Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old   
John Stone
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001 BMW 330ci incident with sales man - 03-05-2004 , 02:30 PM



in article 4117912d.0403050659.225c71e0 (AT) po...OT) google.com, maxima1 at
maxima1 (AT) ameritech (DOT) net wrote on 3/5/04 8:59 AM:

Quote:
The problem is that
the light pattern (in the US version at least) for Xenon lights is such
that, although they may put out more lumens, the area that they illuminate
is inferior to what you get with properly adjusted regulat DOT halogens.

I agree with you. The Xenons on my 528i do not extend very far out and
I tend to need my brights alot when cruising at night at 70-80 mph
just to see where I'm going. Fine around town, but not too great on
the open winding road.
Having driven both extensively, I find it hard to imagine anyone preferring
halogens to Xenons. Have you checked to make sure yours are adjusted
properly?


Quote:
The H4 Philips Vision bulbs (halogens) that I put in my 2K1 Maxima
work fantastic and are definitely better than the Xenons in my 528.

Is there anything about your BMW that you like better than your Nissan?
Sheesh! Why don't you just trade it in on a new Maxima and be done with it?



Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old   
dizzy
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001 BMW 330ci incident with sales man - 03-05-2004 , 07:43 PM



On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:19:32 -0500, "Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam
myrealbox.com> wrote:

Quote:
Probably what you're trying to say is that *US* tungsten dip beam patterns
reach further, due to not having a sharp cut off. Or I hope so, because if
you compare the illumination with the same beam pattern, the tungsten
lights have an inferior output anywhere you care to measure it.

You are correct there. I'm saying the cost of this option is not worth
paying since you get less area of illumination. Whether I am blinding an
oncoming driver with my properly adjusted DOT lights is not my concern since
probably 90% of the cars on the road *over here* also have this type of
headlamp.
My 2 cents: $500 IS an aweful lot of moneyfor a light upgrade,
considering the regular headlights are pretty good - the best I've
experienced. One guy in this thread said you'd be "safer" with the
HID's, which I think it ridiculous.



Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old   
Mike Hall
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001 BMW 330ci incident with sales man - 03-06-2004 , 09:17 AM




"Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam myrealbox.com> wrote

Quote:
"Mike Hall" <mike.hall.mail (AT) sympatico (DOT) ca> wrote in message
news:7c02c.14596$JZ6.470853 (AT) news20 (DOT) bellglobal.com...

DOT headlights on low beam are not good.. they spray light in all
directions, upways being one of them so that overhead road signs can be
read.. Euro lights place a well defined beam spread where you really
need
it, and they reduce glare to oncoming drivers.. in time, I will change
the
headlights on my Jeep GC to Euro style..



If you say so... One place the euro cut-off, non-leveling headlight beams
are particularly bothersome is in driving the back roads around here (New
Hampshire). The roads here are seldom level with all sorts of small (and
larger) hills to contend with. The only flat roads are the highways, and
you hardly even need headlights on those. When descending a hill with
sharp
cut-off beams you can't see sh*t unless you put on high beams.

But, too each his own...

-Fred W

Fred, the secret here is not to outdrive your lights.. I have driven in the
UK and Spain for prolonged periods and without self levelling lights.. on
back roads, unless something was coming the other way, I always used high
beam.. if there were others about, I slowed down and used low beam.. that is
surely just common sense..




Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old   
Fred W.
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001 BMW 330ci incident with sales man - 03-06-2004 , 09:54 AM




"Mike Hall" <mike.hall.mail (AT) sympatico (DOT) ca> wrote


Quote:
Fred, the secret here is not to outdrive your lights.. I have driven in
the
UK and Spain for prolonged periods and without self levelling lights.. on
back roads, unless something was coming the other way, I always used high
beam.. if there were others about, I slowed down and used low beam.. that
is
surely just common sense..
Sure. That *is* the point!

And my limited experience with the US headlights was that I outdrove the
euro cut-off headlight beams (with or without HID) at a lower speed than the
sloppy US spec halogen beams. So I would hesitate to pay extra for that
feature.

If I were faced with the option of either euro cut-off halogens vs. euro
cut-off HIDs, I'm sure I would spring for the HIDs. They would then be the
superior option and worth the extra money.




Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old   
Neil Williams
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 2001 BMW 330ci incident with sales man - 03-06-2004 , 12:29 PM



"Fred W." <Fred.Wills@allspam myrealbox.com> wrote

Quote:
"Dave Plowman" <dave.sound (AT) argonet (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:4c8ad4fac3dave.sound (AT) argonet (DOT) co.uk...

Proper HID lamps are not 'blue' - they are closer to daylight than
tungsten. They may appear blue compared to tungsten, but that's not the
same thing.

I thing drivers in the US that have experienced both the DOT halogens and
the US version of HID Xenons would opt to keep the $1000 and go with the
halogens, *unless* they just want to have the brighter, whiter (and yes
they
appear blue when viewed from an indirect angle) appearance of the Xenons.

The US version of BMW Xenons that I have seen is not self leveling, but
has
the sharper cut-off of european style headlamps. The DOT halogen lamps do
not have the sharp cut-off, so even though they are more blinding to other
drivers, provide a better view down the road on low beam.
Sorry to disagree with you Fred, but I have two BMW's, one with
xenons and one without. I find the light output from the xenons to
be superior, to that point that I've considered retro-fitting them to
my BMW that doesn't have them. And as an option they're only
around $500, not $1000. And they are self-leveling when ordered
as an option, but not when retro-fitted.

I can sort of see your point if you regularly drive somewhere that's
pitch-black. But most urban and suburban areas have enough
ambient lighting and traffic that the sharp cutoff of the xenons is not
an issue.

--Neil




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.