AutosTalk Forums  

Faulty Fuel

Cars Maintenance General car maintenance (uk.rec.cars.maintenance)


Discuss Faulty Fuel in the Cars Maintenance forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Mike G
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Faulty Fuel - 02-28-2007 , 08:02 PM







"Lin Chung" <lin.chung (AT) the (DOT) Water.Margin.com> wrote

Quote:
Mike G wrote:
Lin Chung wrote:
Ian Stirling wrote:
History wrote:
....would the engine warning light come on though if the oxygen
sensor had been damaged? Oxford area...
Almost always....
As all tests from Tesco on damaged cars, fueling stations, tankers, to
fuel depots are negative so far, the suggestion now turns to the
possibility of petrol having accidentally been contaminated with
diesel.
It would take quite a large percentage of diesel in petrol to cause the
problems being reported. Especially as it's affected older cars, as well
as those with more sophisticated electronics.



Yes, I am aware of that. That's why it's fascinating. This suggestion
was
from an oil man in Manchester interviewed on BBC Radio 4 Ten O'clock News.
Eagerly awaiting further revelation...
It's quite surprising to hear some of the comments being made. On our local
radio station, a presenter was saying that even a litre of diesel in a
tankful of petrol could cause expensive engine damage. He also suggested the
problems could be caused by putting leaded fuel into a car designed to run
on unleaded.
As if so many filling stations sell leaded fuel, or the unleaded tanks at
the filling stations have been filled with the stuff
Such ignorance beggars belief.
The only contaminent I can think of that might give many of the symptons is
water, but that's so obvious it would have been discovered by now.
Mike.
Quote:
--
Lin Chung.
[Paste ntlworld over the Water Margin to send a private e-mail.]





Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
David R
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Faulty Fuel - 03-01-2007 , 03:28 AM






"Marvin" <kilauea3 (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
BBC news were reporting this afternoon that it was Tesco and Morrisons
outlets that were affected, but they seem to have stopped saying that now,
possibly the Tesco heavy mob lawyers have been in touch. Wouldnt surprise
me if it was a Tesco money saving excersise gone wrong.
Their ridiculous expansion plans are fuelled by you all shopping there. Stop
it!!




Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
Tony Brett
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Faulty Fuel - 03-01-2007 , 06:03 AM



History wrote:
Quote:
My mum's car is in the garage with the exact symptoms, would the engine
warning light come on though if the oxygen sensor had been damaged?
Oxford
area...
It didn't when I had a faulty sensor on my '94 BMW 525.
AFAIK it 'fine tunes' the fuel/air mixture, which affects the emissions
and
fuel consumption.
My car failed the MOT on emissions, but after it was replaced it passed.
The thing is, that there was no noticeable difference in performance,
between before and after.
I can't see faulty Lamdas giving all the problems that have been
reported.
Cars failing to start, coughing and spluttering, reverting to 'limp home
mode' etc.

Well its confirmed, oxygen sensor is clogged. On a related matter my
girlfriend was complaining of a bad smell coming from her car and running
hot few days ago. Hasn't driven it since. Haven't gotten hold of her yet but
my guess, 95% sure is she filled up at the same Tesco my mum did.

History - I'm posting with a real address. Will you email me and tell
me where your mum and girlfriend buy petrol. I filled my car up last
week but have only driven it a mile since then so want to make sure I'm
not going to have problems.

I filled up at Texaco on Oxford Road Cowley (Formerly Q8) last Wednesday
evening.

Tony


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
Tim..
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Faulty Fuel - 03-01-2007 , 06:50 AM




"Ian Stirling" <root (AT) mauve (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote

Quote:
History <yesindeedtomeplease (AT) ohyes (DOT) com> wrote:
This ones going to run..on.. a....bit:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6405051.stm

Adam

My mum's car is in the garage with the exact symptoms, would the engine
warning light come on though if the oxygen sensor had been damaged?
Oxford
area...

Almost always.
The O2 sensor determines how much fuel it needs to put in.
If that goes wrong, then once the ECU notices it's faulty, it reduces
the fuel drastically to a 'best guess' at 'lean but will sort of run'.

It's better to be lean than rich, as a rich mixture will rapidly destroy
and overheat the catalyst, maybe even causing more damage to the car.
Bollocks, all ECU's default to a slightly rich mixture when the o2 sensor is
knackered- thats why emissions rise, and so does fuel consumption!

Slightly rich is much safer for engine.

It wont damage the cat unless a) there is a misfire, b) the car is run in
this state for some time.

Tim..




Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
Graham
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Faulty Fuel - 03-01-2007 , 06:54 AM



On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:50:27 -0000, "Tim.."
<the.farm.no (AT) spam (DOT) btinternet.com> wrote:
Quote:
Bollocks, all ECU's default to a slightly rich mixture when the o2 sensor is
knackered- thats why emissions rise, and so does fuel consumption!

Slightly rich is much safer for engine.

It wont damage the cat unless a) there is a misfire, b) the car is run in
this state for some time.

Tim..

c) the faulty fuel contains lead which can kill a lambda and a cat.

Graham


Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
David Taylor
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Faulty Fuel - 03-01-2007 , 06:57 AM



On 2007-02-28, Mike G <metier (AT) lycos (DOT) co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
"History" <yesindeedtomeplease (AT) ohyes (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:wtiFh.20273$mn2.6055 (AT) newsfe7-win (DOT) ntli.net...
This ones going to run..on.. a....bit:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6405051.stm

Adam

My mum's car is in the garage with the exact symptoms, would the engine
warning light come on though if the oxygen sensor had been damaged? Oxford
area...

It didn't when I had a faulty sensor on my '94 BMW 525.
AFAIK it 'fine tunes' the fuel/air mixture, which affects the emissions and
fuel consumption.
My car failed the MOT on emissions, but after it was replaced it passed.
The thing is, that there was no noticeable difference in performance,
between before and after.
Yours might just have been marginal, responding slowly or erratically.
If the ECU sees an unchanging reading from the lambda sensor, it'll
give up pretty quickly on using it to work out how much fuel to inject.

Quote:
I can't see faulty Lamdas giving all the problems that have been reported.
Cars failing to start, coughing and spluttering, reverting to 'limp home
mode' etc.
A failed lambda sensor stopping a car from starting is quite unlikely,
I agree.

--
David Taylor


Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
Daytona
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Faulty Fuel - 03-01-2007 , 08:53 AM



On 28 Feb 2007 07:32:58 -0800, "Adam Aglionby" <ledlight (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
wrote:

Quote:
This ones going to run..on.. a....bit:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6405051.stm
All the analysis figures are published on the Greenergy website, but I
don't have the knowledge to be able to interpret them -

Greenergy Citypetrol (95 RON) Sample Analysis

Ethanol %change

21/02/07 2.9
24/02/07 4.3 +48%
27/02/07 4.5 +4.7% +55%

<URL:http://www.greenergy.com/products/technical_product_info/product_quality_certificates.html>

Also old reports (Ethanol reading missing) available from the
excellent archive.org website archiver -
<URL:http://web.archive.org/web/20051028142602/http://www.greenergy.com/products/technical_product_info/product_quality_certificates.html>

Greenergy's statement -
<URL:http://www.greenergy.com/home/Fuel_quality_statement.pdf>

Daytona


Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
www.fuelsaving.info
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Faulty Fuel - 03-01-2007 , 04:13 PM



Very high levels of ethanol in the petrol are actually a plausible
explanation for what has happened. The stoichiometric ratio for
ethanol is 9:1 (vs 14.5:1 for gasoline) so running 50% ethanol is like
being 20% lean. This would cause poor starting, misfires, low power,
etc.

On a post-1993 car the oxygen (lambda) sensor would detect that the
mixture was lean and richen it up to compensate. But the adaptation is
normally limited to something like 15-20% so it could well hit a limit
at which point the ECU assumes the sensor is knackered and goes back
to running open-loop. Now you've poor running *and* a "broken oxygen
sensor" fault logged. Of course, the garage then changes the sensor
even though there is absolutely nothing wrong with it - draining and
refilling the fuel, then resetting the ECU, would have been sufficient
(and several hundred pounds cheaper).

Interestingly, some people have reported air meter faults, which could
also occur if the ECU decides to believe the oxygen sensor not the air
meter.

The idea that 5% ethanol would have this kind of effect is just
nonsense, though - that would be a 2% enleanment which is well within
normal tolerances. And even high levels of ethanol should not actually
damage engine components, at least not over a short timescale (long
term it attacks aluminium, among other materials)

Tony


Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old   
Ben C
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Faulty Fuel - 03-01-2007 , 04:31 PM



On 2007-03-01, www.fuelsaving.info <nospam (AT) fuelsaving (DOT) info> wrote:
Quote:
Very high levels of ethanol in the petrol are actually a plausible
explanation for what has happened. The stoichiometric ratio for
ethanol is 9:1 (vs 14.5:1 for gasoline) so running 50% ethanol is like
being 20% lean. This would cause poor starting, misfires, low power,
etc.

On a post-1993 car the oxygen (lambda) sensor would detect that the
mixture was lean and richen it up to compensate. But the adaptation is
normally limited to something like 15-20% so it could well hit a limit
at which point the ECU assumes the sensor is knackered and goes back
to running open-loop. Now you've poor running *and* a "broken oxygen
sensor" fault logged. Of course, the garage then changes the sensor
even though there is absolutely nothing wrong with it - draining and
refilling the fuel, then resetting the ECU, would have been sufficient
(and several hundred pounds cheaper).

Interestingly, some people have reported air meter faults, which could
also occur if the ECU decides to believe the oxygen sensor not the air
meter.

The idea that 5% ethanol would have this kind of effect is just
nonsense, though - that would be a 2% enleanment which is well within
normal tolerances. And even high levels of ethanol should not actually
damage engine components, at least not over a short timescale (long
term it attacks aluminium, among other materials)
This is an interesting theory.

I filled my car up on Monday from what may be an implicated Tesco. I've
since driven about 30 or 40 miles without any problems. Should I assume
I'm OK or start trying to siphon out the petrol? If it was 50% ethanol
I'm sure I would have noticed by now. If it was silicone or something
slowly gumming up the sensor perhaps the effect could be slower.


Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old   
Daytona
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Faulty Fuel - 03-01-2007 , 04:31 PM



On 1 Mar 2007 14:13:08 -0800, "www.fuelsaving.info"
<nospam (AT) fuelsaving (DOT) info> wrote:

Quote:
The idea that 5% ethanol would have this kind of effect is just
nonsense, though - that would be a 2% enleanment which is well within
normal tolerances. And even high levels of ethanol should not actually
damage engine components, at least not over a short timescale (long
term it attacks aluminium, among other materials)
Thanks for that explanation, now on to the next theory....... :-) why
is silicon (or silicone?) bad ?

Daytona


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.