![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
gazzafield <rufty_tufty_hoolythug (AT) nospam (DOT) thankyou.says_I> wrote: In theory yes, but in practice, all the Yamaha designed 1.25 / 1.4 / 1.6 / 1.7 Zetec S / SE engines have non dismantle-able bottom ends, so if you have a bottom end problem (i.e. need to remove the crank) you can't. I wasn't aware anyone had built an engine like that. It's a bit shit, innit? That's very shit for anyone who prefers to run older cars rather than pay the depreciation on newer ones..... I've never had a crank problem on a car, but I'd hate to scrap a perfectly good car because some idiot decided that you never needed to replace crank bearings. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
Google too clever for you, is it? :-P I have been known to master it - on a good day. ;-) Never gave Google a thought, to be honest. It's handy (google groups in particular) as a resource, not only for reference, but to prevent some people from saying "look it up yourself you lazy cunt" :-) I really wanted owner's feedback on Pumas and added the Nikasil question while I was at it. However, Nikasil does seem a good reason not to buy a 1.7 Puma (or several models of BMW, for that matter). I wouldn't view it as a reason not to buy a Puma - the problem was with BMW V8s ages back, and the issue was high sulphur fuel, mainly just from Shell, and mainly just from one refinery somewhere up North (I think), |
|
then sulphur levels in fuel have got much lower (particularly from the refinery or refineries that were causing the 'problem' fuel), plus people have modified Nikasil liners to cope a bit better. BMW V8s all got their engines replaced under warranty, if the owners could be bothered to get it done (free of charge), but I wouldn't worry a tiny little bit about the Puma in that respect. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
I really wanted owner's feedback on Pumas and added the Nikasil question while I was at it. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
Chap at work has a late model Puma. I've noticed it's already going rotten around the rear wheel arches. Can ask him what he thinks of the car if you like. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <dhh09b$ea$1 (AT) box-public-8 (DOT) jet.uk>, mlv <mike.safetycatchvince nt (AT) jet (DOT) uk> writes I really wanted owner's feedback on Pumas and added the Nikasil question while I was at it. Chap at work has a late model Puma. I've noticed it's already going rotten around the rear wheel arches. Can ask him what he thinks of the car if you like. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
However, Nikasil does seem a good reason not to buy a 1.7 Puma (or several models of BMW, for that matter). I wouldn't view it as a reason not to buy a Puma - the problem was with BMW V8s ages back, |
|
and the issue was high sulphur fuel, mainly just from Shell, and mainly just from one refinery somewhere up North (I think), and since then sulphur levels in fuel have got much lower (particularly from the refinery or refineries that were causing the 'problem' fuel), plus people have modified Nikasil liners to cope a bit better. |
|
BMW V8s all got their engines replaced under warranty, if the owners could be bothered to get it done (free of charge), but I wouldn't worry a tiny little bit about the Puma in that respect. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
I wouldn't view it as a reason not to buy a Puma - the problem was with BMW V8s ages back, and the issue was high sulphur fuel, mainly just from Shell, and mainly just from one refinery somewhere up North (I think), That is what they would like you to believe. In fact cars all over the UK and the USA have had the problem. Don't know about mainland Europe. Also early Jaguar AJV8 4.0 engines had similar problems. At some point Jaguar decided to fit steel liners and BMW switched to another coating. |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
Mike Tomlinson <mike (AT) NOSPAM (DOT) jasper.org.uk> wrote in news:hQZ7A9gxlOPDFwLF (AT) jasper (DOT) org.uk: In article <dhh09b$ea$1 (AT) box-public-8 (DOT) jet.uk>, mlv <mike.safetycatchvince nt (AT) jet (DOT) uk> writes I really wanted owner's feedback on Pumas and added the Nikasil question while I was at it. Chap at work has a late model Puma. I've noticed it's already going rotten around the rear wheel arches. Can ask him what he thinks of the car if you like. A lot of cars have a kind of lip inside the rear arch that collects dirt. IME, relatively few car owners bother to clean this out or are even aware that it exists (some cars, like my Volvo, don't have it because the plastic liner covers it). I may be wrong, but I believe that this collection of dirt is the main reason that some modern cars continue to develop rust there. I always used to wash the dirt out with a hose and my fingers. Might be worth doing as a preventative measure, if you do go for a Puma. -- Stuart Sharp |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Stu" <nobody (AT) home (DOT) com> wrote in message news:Xns96E1A58D0B50Anobodyhomecom (AT) 216 (DOT) 196.109.144... A lot of cars have a kind of lip inside the rear arch that collects dirt. IME, relatively few car owners bother to clean this out or are even aware that it exists (some cars, like my Volvo, don't have it because the plastic liner covers it). I may be wrong, but I believe that this collection of dirt is the main reason that some modern cars continue to develop rust there. I always used to wash the dirt out with a hose and my fingers. Might be worth doing as a preventative measure, if you do go for a Puma. -- Stuart Sharp Yep, my celica has quite a lip on the rear arches - and quite a lot of accumulated mud.. rust doesn't seem to be an issue with those though.... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |