AutosTalk Forums  

VTEC reliability...

Cars Maintenance General car maintenance (uk.rec.cars.maintenance)


Discuss VTEC reliability... in the Cars Maintenance forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Duncan Wood
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VTEC reliability... - 04-14-2007 , 11:36 AM






On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:25:39 +0100, Adrian <toomany2cvs (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
David Taylor (davidt-news (AT) yadt (DOT) co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying :

On an old Top gear that was on the other night, Jeremy Clarkson was
saying that Honda's variable timing kit is so reliable that they
have *never* had a failure ascribed to it.

Any truth in that rumour?

Back when the first (L-reg?) Civic VTis were in the UK, there were a
couple as CoCars where I was working at the time.

One had had a stone-holed rad and been a little bit overheated.
Thereafter, it spent roughly 50% of it's time in dock.

Whether that counts as a failure "ascribed" to the VVT, gawd knows -
but it was one of the things that gave all sorts of shit. Quite why
Honda didn't just lob a new lump in it, gawd knows.

I'd reckon a problem caused by overheating due to a hole in the
radiator is rather unlikely to be ascribed to VVT, don't you?

I'd reckon that an engine that can be so utterly fucked by _only_ a
stone-
damaged rad is not to be held up as a paragon of reliability.

Care to suggest an engine that can't be?


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Adrian
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VTEC reliability... - 04-14-2007 , 11:42 AM






Duncan Wood (newsto (AT) dmx512 (DOT) co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :

Quote:
On an old Top gear that was on the other night, Jeremy Clarkson was
saying that Honda's variable timing kit is so reliable that they
have *never* had a failure ascribed to it.

Any truth in that rumour?

Back when the first (L-reg?) Civic VTis were in the UK, there were a
couple as CoCars where I was working at the time.

One had had a stone-holed rad and been a little bit overheated.
Thereafter, it spent roughly 50% of it's time in dock.

Whether that counts as a failure "ascribed" to the VVT, gawd knows -
but it was one of the things that gave all sorts of shit. Quite why
Honda didn't just lob a new lump in it, gawd knows.

I'd reckon a problem caused by overheating due to a hole in the
radiator is rather unlikely to be ascribed to VVT, don't you?

I'd reckon that an engine that can be so utterly fucked by _only_ a
stone-damaged rad is not to be held up as a paragon of reliability.

Care to suggest an engine that can't be?
The majority.

It wasn't utterly cooked - it was a case of "Oh, it's getting a bit warm -
better stop - bugger, some steam from the rad."

My XM burst a couple of hoses a month or two back - petrol turbo - it'd
been towing a loaded trailer through London traffic - I stopped, started to
unload, and as the static temp rose the front suddenly disappeared behind a
cloud of steam.

It's fine.


Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
Duncan Wood
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VTEC reliability... - 04-14-2007 , 11:50 AM



On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:42:38 +0100, Adrian <toomany2cvs (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
Duncan Wood (newsto (AT) dmx512 (DOT) co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they
were saying :

On an old Top gear that was on the other night, Jeremy Clarkson was
saying that Honda's variable timing kit is so reliable that they
have *never* had a failure ascribed to it.

Any truth in that rumour?

Back when the first (L-reg?) Civic VTis were in the UK, there were a
couple as CoCars where I was working at the time.

One had had a stone-holed rad and been a little bit overheated.
Thereafter, it spent roughly 50% of it's time in dock.

Whether that counts as a failure "ascribed" to the VVT, gawd knows -
but it was one of the things that gave all sorts of shit. Quite why
Honda didn't just lob a new lump in it, gawd knows.

I'd reckon a problem caused by overheating due to a hole in the
radiator is rather unlikely to be ascribed to VVT, don't you?

I'd reckon that an engine that can be so utterly fucked by _only_ a
stone-damaged rad is not to be held up as a paragon of reliability.

Care to suggest an engine that can't be?

The majority.

It wasn't utterly cooked - it was a case of "Oh, it's getting a bit warm
-
better stop - bugger, some steam from the rad."

My XM burst a couple of hoses a month or two back - petrol turbo - it'd
been towing a loaded trailer through London traffic - I stopped, started
to
unload, and as the static temp rose the front suddenly disappeared
behind a
cloud of steam.

It's fine.
Which doesn't bear much resemblance to driving a car that's low on water.


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
Chris Whelan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VTEC reliability... - 04-14-2007 , 11:58 AM




Quote:
I'd reckon that an engine that can be so utterly fucked by _only_ a
stone-
damaged rad is not to be held up as a paragon of reliability.


Care to suggest an engine that can't be?
Ones that have an ECU sensible enough to shut down alternate pairs of
cylinders every other firing stroke, then eventually stop the engine
altogether if temperature continues to rise?

Chris

--
Remove prejudice to reply.


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
DervMan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VTEC reliability... - 04-14-2007 , 12:46 PM



"Chris Whelan" <cawhelan (AT) prejudicentlworld (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
I'd reckon that an engine that can be so utterly fucked by _only_ a
stone-
damaged rad is not to be held up as a paragon of reliability.


Care to suggest an engine that can't be?

Ones that have an ECU sensible enough to shut down alternate pairs of
cylinders every other firing stroke, then eventually stop the engine
altogether if temperature continues to rise?

Ahha but isn't that because the engine would cook itself if it didn't?

--
The DervMan
www.dervman.com




Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
DervMan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VTEC reliability... - 04-14-2007 , 12:47 PM



"Adrian" <toomany2cvs (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
David Taylor (davidt-news (AT) yadt (DOT) co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying :

On an old Top gear that was on the other night, Jeremy Clarkson was
saying that Honda's variable timing kit is so reliable that they
have *never* had a failure ascribed to it.

Any truth in that rumour?

Back when the first (L-reg?) Civic VTis were in the UK, there were a
couple as CoCars where I was working at the time.

One had had a stone-holed rad and been a little bit overheated.
Thereafter, it spent roughly 50% of it's time in dock.

Whether that counts as a failure "ascribed" to the VVT, gawd knows -
but it was one of the things that gave all sorts of shit. Quite why
Honda didn't just lob a new lump in it, gawd knows.

I'd reckon a problem caused by overheating due to a hole in the
radiator is rather unlikely to be ascribed to VVT, don't you?

I'd reckon that an engine that can be so utterly fucked by _only_ a stone-
damaged rad is not to be held up as a paragon of reliability.
It isn't just the radiator, it's idiots ignoring a rising coolant gauge or
warning lights.

--
The DervMan
www.dervman.com




Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
Ian Dalziel
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VTEC reliability... - 04-14-2007 , 01:44 PM



On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:36:15 +0100, "Duncan Wood"
<newsto (AT) dmx512 (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Quote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:25:39 +0100, Adrian <toomany2cvs (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

David Taylor (davidt-news (AT) yadt (DOT) co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying :

On an old Top gear that was on the other night, Jeremy Clarkson was
saying that Honda's variable timing kit is so reliable that they
have *never* had a failure ascribed to it.

Any truth in that rumour?

Back when the first (L-reg?) Civic VTis were in the UK, there were a
couple as CoCars where I was working at the time.

One had had a stone-holed rad and been a little bit overheated.
Thereafter, it spent roughly 50% of it's time in dock.

Whether that counts as a failure "ascribed" to the VVT, gawd knows -
but it was one of the things that gave all sorts of shit. Quite why
Honda didn't just lob a new lump in it, gawd knows.

I'd reckon a problem caused by overheating due to a hole in the
radiator is rather unlikely to be ascribed to VVT, don't you?

I'd reckon that an engine that can be so utterly fucked by _only_ a
stone-
damaged rad is not to be held up as a paragon of reliability.


Care to suggest an engine that can't be?
2CV?

--

Ian D


Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
Pete M
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VTEC reliability... - 04-14-2007 , 01:44 PM



In news782235ccgc6imifrt3hb14dglr1jopo01 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com,
Ian Dalziel <iandalziel (AT) lineone (DOT) net> wittered on forthwith;
Quote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:36:15 +0100, "Duncan Wood"
newsto (AT) dmx512 (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:25:39 +0100, Adrian <toomany2cvs (AT) gmail (DOT) com
wrote:

David Taylor (davidt-news (AT) yadt (DOT) co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying :

On an old Top gear that was on the other night, Jeremy Clarkson
was saying that Honda's variable timing kit is so reliable that
they have *never* had a failure ascribed to it.

Any truth in that rumour?

Back when the first (L-reg?) Civic VTis were in the UK, there
were a couple as CoCars where I was working at the time.

One had had a stone-holed rad and been a little bit overheated.
Thereafter, it spent roughly 50% of it's time in dock.

Whether that counts as a failure "ascribed" to the VVT, gawd
knows - but it was one of the things that gave all sorts of
shit. Quite why Honda didn't just lob a new lump in it, gawd
knows.

I'd reckon a problem caused by overheating due to a hole in the
radiator is rather unlikely to be ascribed to VVT, don't you?

I'd reckon that an engine that can be so utterly fucked by _only_ a
stone-
damaged rad is not to be held up as a paragon of reliability.


Care to suggest an engine that can't be?

2CV?
VW Beetle (Proper one, not a Golf in a frock)


--
Pete M - Using the Scouse Side of the Force -
Golf GTi Mk2 (2.0 transplant in progress),
Golf GTi Mk1 (For Sale)
OMF#9

Currently listening to The White Stripes




Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old   
PC Paul
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VTEC reliability... - 04-14-2007 , 02:07 PM



Adrian wrote:
Quote:
Duncan Wood (newsto (AT) dmx512 (DOT) co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like

I'd reckon that an engine that can be so utterly fucked by _only_ a
stone-damaged rad is not to be held up as a paragon of reliability.

Care to suggest an engine that can't be?

The majority.

It wasn't utterly cooked - it was a case of "Oh, it's getting a bit
warm - better stop - bugger, some steam from the rad."

My old Nissan Bluebird had a leaky radiator which I didn't bother to fix
since it was only a month or two from the scrapheap.

On a longish trip home, the leak became a spurt and it ran dry. Since the
temp gauge was erratic, the first I knew was when it started missing and
sputtering, then died. Late on a Sunday night in the middle of nowhere
useful, obviously.

I rolled to a stop, waited for it to cool down, then used the water I always
carried to top up and carried on.

Between stopping to refill the water container at every opportunity and
occasionally stopping because, well, it stopped, I did 50 miles with about
six engine failures.

Got home, siliconed the leak, and carried on using it for about another 1500
miles before it went to the great scrapheap in the sky. No problems.





Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old   
DervMan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: VTEC reliability... - 04-15-2007 , 03:11 AM



"PC Paul" <urd (AT) bitrot (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
Adrian wrote:
Duncan Wood (newsto (AT) dmx512 (DOT) co.uk) gurgled happily, sounding much like

I'd reckon that an engine that can be so utterly fucked by _only_ a
stone-damaged rad is not to be held up as a paragon of reliability.

Care to suggest an engine that can't be?

The majority.

It wasn't utterly cooked - it was a case of "Oh, it's getting a bit
warm - better stop - bugger, some steam from the rad."


My old Nissan Bluebird had a leaky radiator which I didn't bother to fix
since it was only a month or two from the scrapheap.

On a longish trip home, the leak became a spurt and it ran dry. Since the
temp gauge was erratic, the first I knew was when it started missing and
sputtering, then died. Late on a Sunday night in the middle of nowhere
useful, obviously.

I rolled to a stop, waited for it to cool down, then used the water I
always carried to top up and carried on.

Between stopping to refill the water container at every opportunity and
occasionally stopping because, well, it stopped, I did 50 miles with about
six engine failures.

Got home, siliconed the leak, and carried on using it for about another
1500 miles before it went to the great scrapheap in the sky. No problems.

These stories are not as rare as you might think, but the difference between
your good self and the majority of people out there is you knew how to keep
going and didn't do one of the two extremes:

One, ring the RAC and be mugged / stabbed whilst waiting.

Two, continue without the water regardless.

You had anticipated the problem, thus, did something about it. The majority
of people treat their car mechanics as though they treat their driving - no
acceptation whatsoever other than breakdown / insurance.

--
The DervMan
www.dervman.com




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.