![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
It does exactly what it says on the tin. Feck. Wrong group. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
It does exactly what it says on the tin. I'd been having issues with the Macbook running stupidly hot and suffering constant fan noise, after leaving it running 24/7 for a few days. (ie. didn't even put it to sleep). |
|
Given that I wasn't doing anything processor intensive, I shelled out for CoolBookController in order to shut it up. I've been running at a very cool 52 degrees-ish for a few days since I chopped the processor back to 1GHz. Battery life is up, too. |
|
All-in-all, it's an essential purchase for anyone with a Core Duo laptop - I just can't understand why Apple didn't let us throttle the processor in the energy saving panel. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
SteveH wrote: It does exactly what it says on the tin. I'd been having issues with the Macbook running stupidly hot and suffering constant fan noise, after leaving it running 24/7 for a few days. (ie. didn't even put it to sleep). Crap, memory leaky Apple programs? (c: |
|
Given that I wasn't doing anything processor intensive, I shelled out for CoolBookController in order to shut it up. I've been running at a very cool 52 degrees-ish for a few days since I chopped the processor back to 1GHz. Battery life is up, too. Sounds a bit crap to me, why didn't you get something running nice XP or Vista out of the box? |
|
All-in-all, it's an essential purchase for anyone with a Core Duo laptop - I just can't understand why Apple didn't let us throttle the processor in the energy saving panel. Funny that, as throttling has been a feature of Intel laptop chipsets for ages. |
#5
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
Douglas Payne <douggie (AT) cheerful (DOT) com> wrote: SteveH wrote: It does exactly what it says on the tin. I'd been having issues with the Macbook running stupidly hot and suffering constant fan noise, after leaving it running 24/7 for a few days. (ie. didn't even put it to sleep). Crap, memory leaky Apple programs? (c: Or maybe a tiny little notebook isn't designed to be run 24/7? |
|
Given that I wasn't doing anything processor intensive, I shelled out for CoolBookController in order to shut it up. I've been running at a very cool 52 degrees-ish for a few days since I chopped the processor back to 1GHz. Battery life is up, too. Sounds a bit crap to me, why didn't you get something running nice XP or Vista out of the box? Lol. If I run this on XP, the fans go crazy. |
|
All-in-all, it's an essential purchase for anyone with a Core Duo laptop - I just can't understand why Apple didn't let us throttle the processor in the energy saving panel. Funny that, as throttling has been a feature of Intel laptop chipsets for ages. Apple claim that the OS takes care of everything - but if you have one shite program running (My current favourite suspect is Azureous) the OS loses control. |
|
Anyway, I'm happy that someone has released a decent front-end for the Kernel CPU controls. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
SteveH wrote: Douglas Payne <douggie (AT) cheerful (DOT) com> wrote: SteveH wrote: It does exactly what it says on the tin. I'd been having issues with the Macbook running stupidly hot and suffering constant fan noise, after leaving it running 24/7 for a few days. (ie. didn't even put it to sleep). Crap, memory leaky Apple programs? (c: Or maybe a tiny little notebook isn't designed to be run 24/7? Doesn't seem to bother my Thinkpad, and presumably it has to work harder on account of being slower and less powerful. Given that I wasn't doing anything processor intensive, I shelled out for CoolBookController in order to shut it up. I've been running at a very cool 52 degrees-ish for a few days since I chopped the processor back to 1GHz. Battery life is up, too. Sounds a bit crap to me, why didn't you get something running nice XP or Vista out of the box? Lol. If I run this on XP, the fans go crazy. Lack of drivers for the Mac's chipset? All-in-all, it's an essential purchase for anyone with a Core Duo laptop - I just can't understand why Apple didn't let us throttle the processor in the energy saving panel. Funny that, as throttling has been a feature of Intel laptop chipsets for ages. Apple claim that the OS takes care of everything - but if you have one shite program running (My current favourite suspect is Azureous) the OS loses control. Azureus? It is shite as far as memory and CPU time are concerned on all the platforms I've tried. It also makes my netgear routers throw hissy fits from time to time. Anyway, I'm happy that someone has released a decent front-end for the Kernel CPU controls. You wouldn't need to be if you'd chosen a decent OS... |
#7
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
Or maybe a tiny little notebook isn't designed to be run 24/7? Doesn't seem to bother my Thinkpad, and presumably it has to work harder on account of being slower and less powerful. |
|
Given that I wasn't doing anything processor intensive, I shelled out for CoolBookController in order to shut it up. I've been running at a very cool 52 degrees-ish for a few days since I chopped the processor back to 1GHz. Battery life is up, too. Sounds a bit crap to me, why didn't you get something running nice XP or Vista out of the box? Lol. If I run this on XP, the fans go crazy. Lack of drivers for the Mac's chipset? |
|
All-in-all, it's an essential purchase for anyone with a Core Duo laptop - I just can't understand why Apple didn't let us throttle the processor in the energy saving panel. Funny that, as throttling has been a feature of Intel laptop chipsets for ages. Apple claim that the OS takes care of everything - but if you have one shite program running (My current favourite suspect is Azureous) the OS loses control. Azureus? It is shite as far as memory and CPU time are concerned on all the platforms I've tried. It also makes my netgear routers throw hissy fits from time to time. |
|
Anyway, I'm happy that someone has released a decent front-end for the Kernel CPU controls. You wouldn't need to be if you'd chosen a decent OS... |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Anyway, I'm happy that someone has released a decent front-end for the Kernel CPU controls. You wouldn't need to be if you'd chosen a decent OS... Agreed, what's the point in buying a laptop with a decent CPU, then turning it down to prehistoric power... |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Iridium <iridiumdan (AT) googlemail (DOT) com> wrote: Anyway, I'm happy that someone has released a decent front-end for the Kernel CPU controls. You wouldn't need to be if you'd chosen a decent OS... Agreed, what's the point in buying a laptop with a decent CPU, then turning it down to prehistoric power... Because, in reality, you don't need 2GHz of Core Duo power 99.9% of the time. Much better to throttle back for better battery life / energy efficiency. |
|
Let's put it this way - I haven't noticed any significant slowdown in performance even though I've cut CPU speed by half. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Because, in reality, you don't need 2GHz of Core Duo power 99.9% of the time. Much better to throttle back for better battery life / energy efficiency. Why did you buy a grossly overpowered computer in the first place then? |
|
Let's put it this way - I haven't noticed any significant slowdown in performance even though I've cut CPU speed by half. I'm gonna run my car on 2 cylinders to see if I can tell the difference. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |