AutosTalk Forums  

CoolBookController mini review

Cars Modifications Aspects of car modifications (tuning, styling) (uk.rec.cars.modifications)


Discuss CoolBookController mini review in the Cars Modifications forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
SteveH
 
Posts: n/a

Default CoolBookController mini review - 05-10-2007 , 11:56 AM






It does exactly what it says on the tin.

I'd been having issues with the Macbook running stupidly hot and
suffering constant fan noise, after leaving it running 24/7 for a few
days. (ie. didn't even put it to sleep).

Given that I wasn't doing anything processor intensive, I shelled out
for CoolBookController in order to shut it up. I've been running at a
very cool 52 degrees-ish for a few days since I chopped the processor
back to 1GHz. Battery life is up, too.

All-in-all, it's an essential purchase for anyone with a Core Duo laptop
- I just can't understand why Apple didn't let us throttle the processor
in the energy saving panel.

--
SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL
BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
SteveH
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CoolBookController mini review - 05-10-2007 , 12:08 PM






SteveH <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Quote:
It does exactly what it says on the tin.

Feck. Wrong group.

--
SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL
BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Douglas Payne
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CoolBookController mini review - 05-10-2007 , 12:23 PM



SteveH wrote:
Quote:
It does exactly what it says on the tin.

I'd been having issues with the Macbook running stupidly hot and
suffering constant fan noise, after leaving it running 24/7 for a few
days. (ie. didn't even put it to sleep).
Crap, memory leaky Apple programs? (c:

Quote:
Given that I wasn't doing anything processor intensive, I shelled out
for CoolBookController in order to shut it up. I've been running at a
very cool 52 degrees-ish for a few days since I chopped the processor
back to 1GHz. Battery life is up, too.
Sounds a bit crap to me, why didn't you get something running nice XP or
Vista out of the box?

Quote:
All-in-all, it's an essential purchase for anyone with a Core Duo laptop
- I just can't understand why Apple didn't let us throttle the processor
in the energy saving panel.
Funny that, as throttling has been a feature of Intel laptop chipsets
for ages.

--
Douglas


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
SteveH
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CoolBookController mini review - 05-10-2007 , 12:28 PM



Douglas Payne <douggie (AT) cheerful (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
SteveH wrote:
It does exactly what it says on the tin.

I'd been having issues with the Macbook running stupidly hot and
suffering constant fan noise, after leaving it running 24/7 for a few
days. (ie. didn't even put it to sleep).

Crap, memory leaky Apple programs? (c:
Or maybe a tiny little notebook isn't designed to be run 24/7?

Quote:
Given that I wasn't doing anything processor intensive, I shelled out
for CoolBookController in order to shut it up. I've been running at a
very cool 52 degrees-ish for a few days since I chopped the processor
back to 1GHz. Battery life is up, too.

Sounds a bit crap to me, why didn't you get something running nice XP or
Vista out of the box?
Lol.

If I run this on XP, the fans go crazy.

Quote:
All-in-all, it's an essential purchase for anyone with a Core Duo laptop
- I just can't understand why Apple didn't let us throttle the processor
in the energy saving panel.

Funny that, as throttling has been a feature of Intel laptop chipsets
for ages.
Apple claim that the OS takes care of everything - but if you have one
shite program running (My current favourite suspect is Azureous) the OS
loses control.

Anyway, I'm happy that someone has released a decent front-end for the
Kernel CPU controls.
--
SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL
BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Douglas Payne
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CoolBookController mini review - 05-10-2007 , 12:40 PM



SteveH wrote:
Quote:
Douglas Payne <douggie (AT) cheerful (DOT) com> wrote:


SteveH wrote:

It does exactly what it says on the tin.

I'd been having issues with the Macbook running stupidly hot and
suffering constant fan noise, after leaving it running 24/7 for a few
days. (ie. didn't even put it to sleep).

Crap, memory leaky Apple programs? (c:


Or maybe a tiny little notebook isn't designed to be run 24/7?
Doesn't seem to bother my Thinkpad, and presumably it has to work harder
on account of being slower and less powerful.

Quote:
Given that I wasn't doing anything processor intensive, I shelled out
for CoolBookController in order to shut it up. I've been running at a
very cool 52 degrees-ish for a few days since I chopped the processor
back to 1GHz. Battery life is up, too.

Sounds a bit crap to me, why didn't you get something running nice XP or
Vista out of the box?


Lol.

If I run this on XP, the fans go crazy.
Lack of drivers for the Mac's chipset?

Quote:
All-in-all, it's an essential purchase for anyone with a Core Duo laptop
- I just can't understand why Apple didn't let us throttle the processor
in the energy saving panel.

Funny that, as throttling has been a feature of Intel laptop chipsets
for ages.


Apple claim that the OS takes care of everything - but if you have one
shite program running (My current favourite suspect is Azureous) the OS
loses control.
Azureus? It is shite as far as memory and CPU time are concerned on all
the platforms I've tried. It also makes my netgear routers throw hissy
fits from time to time.

Quote:
Anyway, I'm happy that someone has released a decent front-end for the
Kernel CPU controls.
You wouldn't need to be if you'd chosen a decent OS...

--
Douglas


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Iridium
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CoolBookController mini review - 05-10-2007 , 12:43 PM



"Douglas Payne" <douggie (AT) cheerful (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
SteveH wrote:
Douglas Payne <douggie (AT) cheerful (DOT) com> wrote:


SteveH wrote:

It does exactly what it says on the tin.

I'd been having issues with the Macbook running stupidly hot and
suffering constant fan noise, after leaving it running 24/7 for a few
days. (ie. didn't even put it to sleep).

Crap, memory leaky Apple programs? (c:


Or maybe a tiny little notebook isn't designed to be run 24/7?

Doesn't seem to bother my Thinkpad, and presumably it has to work harder
on account of being slower and less powerful.

Given that I wasn't doing anything processor intensive, I shelled out
for CoolBookController in order to shut it up. I've been running at a
very cool 52 degrees-ish for a few days since I chopped the processor
back to 1GHz. Battery life is up, too.

Sounds a bit crap to me, why didn't you get something running nice XP or
Vista out of the box?


Lol.

If I run this on XP, the fans go crazy.

Lack of drivers for the Mac's chipset?

All-in-all, it's an essential purchase for anyone with a Core Duo laptop
- I just can't understand why Apple didn't let us throttle the processor
in the energy saving panel.

Funny that, as throttling has been a feature of Intel laptop chipsets
for ages.


Apple claim that the OS takes care of everything - but if you have one
shite program running (My current favourite suspect is Azureous) the OS
loses control.

Azureus? It is shite as far as memory and CPU time are concerned on all
the platforms I've tried. It also makes my netgear routers throw hissy
fits from time to time.

Anyway, I'm happy that someone has released a decent front-end for the
Kernel CPU controls.

You wouldn't need to be if you'd chosen a decent OS...

Agreed, what's the point in buying a laptop with a decent CPU, then turning
it down to prehistoric power...

--
Dan




Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
SteveH
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CoolBookController mini review - 05-10-2007 , 12:48 PM



Douglas Payne <douggie (AT) cheerful (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
Or maybe a tiny little notebook isn't designed to be run 24/7?

Doesn't seem to bother my Thinkpad, and presumably it has to work harder
on account of being slower and less powerful.
I have a Thinkpad and the MacBook on the coffee table in front of me.

The Thinkpad is twice as thick, twice as heavy, around the same width
but a good few inches deeper than the Macbook..... I think we can assume
there's a lot more space inside the Thinkpad for air to circulate.

Quote:
Given that I wasn't doing anything processor intensive, I shelled out
for CoolBookController in order to shut it up. I've been running at a
very cool 52 degrees-ish for a few days since I chopped the processor
back to 1GHz. Battery life is up, too.

Sounds a bit crap to me, why didn't you get something running nice XP or
Vista out of the box?


Lol.

If I run this on XP, the fans go crazy.

Lack of drivers for the Mac's chipset?
No, 'cos there's nothing in the chipset that's specific to the MacBook
in reality.

Quote:
All-in-all, it's an essential purchase for anyone with a Core Duo laptop
- I just can't understand why Apple didn't let us throttle the processor
in the energy saving panel.

Funny that, as throttling has been a feature of Intel laptop chipsets
for ages.


Apple claim that the OS takes care of everything - but if you have one
shite program running (My current favourite suspect is Azureous) the OS
loses control.

Azureus? It is shite as far as memory and CPU time are concerned on all
the platforms I've tried. It also makes my netgear routers throw hissy
fits from time to time.
That's probably what's causing the issues, then.

Quote:
Anyway, I'm happy that someone has released a decent front-end for the
Kernel CPU controls.

You wouldn't need to be if you'd chosen a decent OS...
Says the man who shelled out a lot of money on a Mac desktop.
--
SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL
BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
SteveH
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CoolBookController mini review - 05-10-2007 , 12:49 PM



Iridium <iridiumdan (AT) googlemail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
Anyway, I'm happy that someone has released a decent front-end for the
Kernel CPU controls.

You wouldn't need to be if you'd chosen a decent OS...


Agreed, what's the point in buying a laptop with a decent CPU, then turning
it down to prehistoric power...
Because, in reality, you don't need 2GHz of Core Duo power 99.9% of the
time.

Much better to throttle back for better battery life / energy
efficiency.

Let's put it this way - I haven't noticed any significant slowdown in
performance even though I've cut CPU speed by half.
--
SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL
BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
Douglas Payne
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CoolBookController mini review - 05-10-2007 , 01:00 PM



SteveH wrote:
Quote:
Iridium <iridiumdan (AT) googlemail (DOT) com> wrote:


Anyway, I'm happy that someone has released a decent front-end for the
Kernel CPU controls.

You wouldn't need to be if you'd chosen a decent OS...


Agreed, what's the point in buying a laptop with a decent CPU, then turning
it down to prehistoric power...


Because, in reality, you don't need 2GHz of Core Duo power 99.9% of the
time.

Much better to throttle back for better battery life / energy
efficiency.
Why did you buy a grossly overpowered computer in the first place then?

Quote:
Let's put it this way - I haven't noticed any significant slowdown in
performance even though I've cut CPU speed by half.
I'm gonna run my car on 2 cylinders to see if I can tell the difference.

--
Douglas


Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
SteveH
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: CoolBookController mini review - 05-10-2007 , 01:03 PM



Douglas Payne <douggie (AT) cheerful (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
Because, in reality, you don't need 2GHz of Core Duo power 99.9% of the
time.

Much better to throttle back for better battery life / energy
efficiency.

Why did you buy a grossly overpowered computer in the first place then?
The same reason you bought a rag-top car whilst living in one of the
coldest and wettest places in Europe ;-)

Quote:
Let's put it this way - I haven't noticed any significant slowdown in
performance even though I've cut CPU speed by half.

I'm gonna run my car on 2 cylinders to see if I can tell the difference.
I fail to get the comparison.

I'm barely stressing this hardware - because an Intel Core Duo at 1GHz
comprehensively outperforms a 1GHz G4 (which is what my last laptop
had).

Why didn't I buy something slower? - perhaps because you can't - the
MacBook is Apple's entry-level consumer notebook these days.
--
SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL
BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.