On the Diesel V Petrol debate...

#**101**

Depresion <blank (AT) 128 (DOT) 0.0.1> wrote

Quote:

"Stuffed" <merde (AT) theworld (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:c7bgau$uos$1 (AT) news (DOT) freedom2surf.net...

Totally agree. They're playing with the cars far too much as a reaction
to
one team and driver doing a good job. There are ways to maybe reduce
costs,
but redesigning the engines isn't one of them. Plus, if they want more
interesting races and higher, they ought to consider doing something
about
the bloody tracks, IMO.

I'd say the tracks are the main problem, followed by the aerodynamics as
cars
are now so reliant on them and they disturb it so much that the impact on
the
following car is massive. I would be looking at banning rear wings but
allowing
more ground effect down force.

Can't find fault with any of that. But like it's going to change while Max
is in charge. Recently read he's looking at creating more overtaking, as
it's what the fans want. This is the same guy as said the fans didn't want
to see overtaking but preferred strategic races, when he brought refuelling
back in ten years ago.

#**102**

Nom <Nom (AT) Somewhere (DOT) Somewhere> wrote

Quote:

Stuffed wrote:
Just thought I'd add that to stir up the power v torque debate again

Noooooooooooooooo !!!!!!!!

It was a good read last time round

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

On the Diesel V Petrol debate...

Cars Modifications Aspects of car modifications (tuning, styling) (uk.rec.cars.modifications)

Re: On the Diesel V Petrol debate... - 05-12-2004 , 06:59 PM

Re: On the Diesel V Petrol debate... - 05-12-2004 , 06:59 PM