![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#51
| |||
| |||
|
|
Why would car makers fit inefficient air filters? They don't. Paper filters are "good enough" - why would the car maker fit hugely more expensive oil-coated foam/cotton elements ? |
|
Do Land Rover etc use K&N for their 'safari' vehicles? Nope - why would they ? Paper filters do the job fine, providing they're changed regularly. Just because a paper filter is "good enough" at filtration, doesn't mean it can't be improved though ![]() |
#52
| |||
| |||
|
|
AFAIK Aston Martin use them! |
#53
| |||
| |||
|
#54
| |||
| |||
|
|
There's plenty of independent research to support this. K&N are fitted for looks and or noise - not improved performance. Indeed, they can often *reduce* performance - a prime example being the Rover V-8 injection as fitted to the SD1 Vitesse, etc. |
#55
| |||
| |||
|
|
It seems very few people consider keeping standard trunking in place, and fitting the K&Ns ahead of this. |
#56
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
That's the point. A K&N neither improves filtration or flow - unless you compare it with a blocked paper one. |
|
And its filtration is considerably poorer than a paper one within its service interval. |
|
There's plenty of independent research to support this. |
|
K&N are fitted for looks and or noise - not improved performance. |
|
Indeed, they can often *reduce* performance - a prime example being the Rover V-8 injection as fitted to the SD1 Vitesse, etc. |
#57
| |||
| |||
|
|
The message <c7a7lg$1d7$1 (AT) titan (DOT) btinternet.com from "Martin \(Please note spammers email address used\)" avtoteplo (AT) altern (DOT) org> contains these words: AFAIK Aston Martin use them! That's quite likely 'cos they're produced in such small numbers that it's cheaper to buy in a filter than develop one in-house. |
#58
| |||
| |||
|
|
AFAIK Aston Martin use them! That's quite likely 'cos they're produced in such small numbers that it's cheaper to buy in a filter than develop one in-house. So they're obviously excellent then. If they weren't more than a match for a paper element, then Aston would be using said paper element ! |
#59
| |||
| |||
|
|
That's the point. A K&N neither improves filtration or flow - unless you compare it with a blocked paper one. But it improves both - that's the whole point ! Most top-level motorsport cars use the oil-coated-filter setup - they don't use paper filters. Specifically, a BMC filter-equipped car won LeMans for about the last 5 years running ! |
|
And its filtration is considerably poorer than a paper one within its service interval. But it's not ! There's plenty of independent research to support this. Poppycock. |
|
K&N are fitted for looks and or noise - not improved performance. Huh ? You can't see or hear your filter element ! I'm not talking about cones here. Indeed, they can often *reduce* performance - a prime example being the Rover V-8 injection as fitted to the SD1 Vitesse, etc. No, you're talking about cone filters. A completely different story. |
#60
| |||
| |||
|
|
AFAIK Aston Martin use them! That's quite likely 'cos they're produced in such small numbers that it's cheaper to buy in a filter than develop one in-house. So they're obviously excellent then. If they weren't more than a match for a paper element, then Aston would be using said paper element ! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |