AutosTalk Forums  

More OOMPH! from my Ford Ka

Cars Modifications Aspects of car modifications (tuning, styling) (uk.rec.cars.modifications)


Discuss More OOMPH! from my Ford Ka in the Cars Modifications forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Dan405
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: More OOMPH! from my Ford Ka - 02-15-2004 , 10:04 AM






"**-**" <m.faulks (AT) btinternet (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
were
trying to get more power from my Ka though, AFAIK the chip gives a
pretty
small increase in horsepower, whereas nitrous could give you an
extra
20
horses when you need it.

Wow!!!!! Eighty horsepower.

Strange the things these people who own these quaint little
underpowered
shopping trolleys get excited by.

80 horses is 33% more than 60 though, so I'd imagine it'd be pretty
noticable and handy for overtaking. Of course, Diesel drivers dream
about
having a whole horsepower, and being able to go above 2000 revs .



Why would you want to go over 2000 rpm when you have a big fat 220lb/ft
of
torque at 1900rpm. I want a CVT that will keep my engine at 1900rpm all
the
time.

1900rpm, cool. My 314ft/lb doesn't arrive until 3600rpm, closely followed
by
the 307bhp at 5650rpm ;-)


Both of my lb/ft's come in at 3,000rpm

--
Dan
http://www.danontherun.com




Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Bob Sherunckle
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: More OOMPH! from my Ford Ka - 02-15-2004 , 10:16 AM







"**-**" <m.faulks (AT) btinternet (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"Bob Sherunckle" <nowayjose (AT) thisisp (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:c0nu52$nd0$1 (AT) titan (DOT) btinternet.com...

"Doki" <doki (AT) SPAMMENOTspidar (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1076848657.8236.0 (AT) ersa (DOT) uk.clara.net...

AstraVanMan <FuckOff (AT) WithThanks (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:L5JXb.6151$cb7.47701 (AT) newsfep4-glfd (DOT) server.ntli.net...
It's not a chip as such, the ecu is reprogrammed via the
diagnostics
port,
so you can turn it on and off when you want. I'd go with nitrous
if
I
were
trying to get more power from my Ka though, AFAIK the chip gives a
pretty
small increase in horsepower, whereas nitrous could give you an
extra
20
horses when you need it.

Wow!!!!! Eighty horsepower.

Strange the things these people who own these quaint little
underpowered
shopping trolleys get excited by.

80 horses is 33% more than 60 though, so I'd imagine it'd be pretty
noticable and handy for overtaking. Of course, Diesel drivers dream
about
having a whole horsepower, and being able to go above 2000 revs .



Why would you want to go over 2000 rpm when you have a big fat 220lb/ft
of
torque at 1900rpm. I want a CVT that will keep my engine at 1900rpm all
the
time.

1900rpm, cool. My 314ft/lb doesn't arrive until 3600rpm, closely followed
by
the 307bhp at 5650rpm ;-)


Well - I'll never have 307bhp, that's for sure. However a Jabba remap
promises around 185bhp and 300-320lb/ft of torque, still at a crank speed
just above tickover. Economy is currently around 39mpg, I wonder what the
impact would be on that.




Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
David Dawkins
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: More OOMPH! from my Ford Ka - 02-15-2004 , 03:29 PM



Quote:
Hi,
I would just like a *little* more kick out of my bog standard 1.3 Ka,
does anyone have any recommendations? (leaving myself wide open there...


I was wondering if there was "chip kit", or some-such?

There is a chip, there's an article on it on Dervman's site
(www.dervman.com)

It's not a chip as such, the ecu is reprogrammed via the diagnostics port,
so you can turn it on and off when you want. I'd go with nitrous if I were
trying to get more power from my Ka though, AFAIK the chip gives a pretty
small increase in horsepower, whereas nitrous could give you an extra 20
horses when you need it.
Thanks everyone. The nitrous thing made me laugh, I just can't imagine
telling my insurance company about that... they'd probably reach down
the phone and strangle me. Or steal my wallet.

Dave D


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
**-**
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: More OOMPH! from my Ford Ka - 02-15-2004 , 03:52 PM




"David Dawkins" <david_j_dawkins (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Hi,
I would just like a *little* more kick out of my bog standard 1.3 Ka,
does anyone have any recommendations? (leaving myself wide open
there...


I was wondering if there was "chip kit", or some-such?

There is a chip, there's an article on it on Dervman's site
(www.dervman.com)

It's not a chip as such, the ecu is reprogrammed via the diagnostics
port,
so you can turn it on and off when you want. I'd go with nitrous if I
were
trying to get more power from my Ka though, AFAIK the chip gives a
pretty
small increase in horsepower, whereas nitrous could give you an extra 20
horses when you need it.

Thanks everyone. The nitrous thing made me laugh, I just can't imagine
telling my insurance company about that... they'd probably reach down
the phone and strangle me. Or steal my wallet.

Dave D
Change companies then. Nitrous is the only thing that will give you a
sizeable, (as)constant(as you want) power increase for reasonable money.

Matt




Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
FEo2 Welder
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: More OOMPH! from my Ford Ka - 02-15-2004 , 04:43 PM



Remove engine/gearbox/seats/wheels ... should then weigh the
same as my citroen ax, but then you'd have 0bhp and i'd have 128bhp.
No seriously ... if you can find/afford a lower ratio gearbox (i'm not
familier with ka's) this might provide the extra uuumph you want.
Bearing in mind most lower models never hit maximum revs in top
gear, you wouldn't have problems with running out of revs before
power with a lower ratio box.
Example:
My citroen axgt used to do 120mph at 6000rpm.
Fitting a 'box from its near cousin (205xs) changed that
to 7000rpm at 120mph.
I don't go to 120mph often, so not a problem .... obviously
it hauls off the line better.....this being far more useful than
a high top speed.

(I then modified the engine after i did the gearbox).


--
(Scum Mail Bouncer In use).
(Remove the two "n" from email address to reply directly).

Regards.....
Steve.


"David Dawkins" <david_j_dawkins (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Hi,
I would just like a *little* more kick out of my bog standard 1.3 Ka,
does anyone have any recommendations? (leaving myself wide open there...


I was wondering if there was "chip kit", or some-such?

many thanks

Dave D

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 06/02/2004




Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
FEo2 Welder
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: More OOMPH! from my Ford Ka - 02-15-2004 , 04:46 PM




"AstraVanMan" <FuckOff (AT) WithThanks (DOT) com> wrote


Quote:
Wow!!!!! Eighty horsepower.

Strange the things these people who own these quaint little underpowered
shopping trolleys get excited by.
Most cars would be seriously wasted by that amount of horsepower
on a motorbike!!!

Someone else who doesn't understand power to weight ratios.

--
(Scum Mail Bouncer In use).
(Remove the two "n" from email address to reply directly).

Regards.....
Steve.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 06/02/2004




Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
FEo2 Welder
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: More OOMPH! from my Ford Ka - 02-15-2004 , 04:48 PM




"DervMan" <dervman (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
And of course, you can probably get a Sportka for less, too...
And i bet the sportka is substantially heavier than its "roofed" sister.
=== Slower.

--
(Scum Mail Bouncer In use).
(Remove the two "n" from email address to reply directly).

Regards.....
Steve.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 06/02/2004




Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
FEo2 Welder
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: More OOMPH! from my Ford Ka - 02-15-2004 , 04:50 PM




"**-**" <m.faulks (AT) btinternet (DOT) com> wrote


.. My 314ft/lb doesn't arrive until 3600rpm, closely followed by
Quote:
the 307bhp at 5650rpm ;-)
Whats it hauling???
Tin foil citroen.
or
Lead shed bmw.


--
(Scum Mail Bouncer In use).
(Remove the two "n" from email address to reply directly).

Regards.....
Steve.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 06/02/2004




Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old   
Dan405
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: More OOMPH! from my Ford Ka - 02-15-2004 , 05:02 PM



"FEo2 Welder" <gobuggeryourself (AT) home (DOT) mr.spammer> wrote

Quote:
"**-**" <m.faulks (AT) btinternet (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:c0o0de$182pr6$1 (AT) ID-199813 (DOT) news.uni-berlin.de...

. My 314ft/lb doesn't arrive until 3600rpm, closely followed by
the 307bhp at 5650rpm ;-)

Whats it hauling???
Tin foil citroen.
or
Lead shed bmw.


You don't know what Matt drives...? I suspect you need to pay attention
more

www.f900.co.uk


--
Dan
http://www.danontherun.com




Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old   
Dan405
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: More OOMPH! from my Ford Ka - 02-15-2004 , 05:03 PM



"FEo2 Welder" <gobuggeryourself (AT) home (DOT) mr.spammer> wrote

Quote:
Wow!!!!! Eighty horsepower.

Strange the things these people who own these quaint little underpowered
shopping trolleys get excited by.

Most cars would be seriously wasted by that amount of horsepower
on a motorbike!!!

Someone else who doesn't understand power to weight ratios.

You can't compare cars and bikes. If my RC car had 60bhp, it would waste
any motorbike. Not exactly a fair comparison. Like comparing apples and
dinner plates.


--
Dan
http://www.danontherun.com




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.