![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Slow. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote: Slow. The 'plus' version is even worse. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote: Slow. The 'plus' version is even worse. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
In news:1hsejua.1hgmziv157ys7nN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk, SteveH <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wittered on forthwith; Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote: Slow. The 'plus' version is even worse. The 1.4 FSi has a 0-60 measured best on a sundial. One of the very few vehicles I've ever driven that has barely perceptible acceleration. The Golf SDi is another, the Rover non-turbo diesel 218 thing is possibly slower than a misfiring 2CV. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Pete M" <pete.murray (AT) bogoffwithzepressedmeatblueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:ep5j9d$cf4$1 (AT) registered (DOT) motzarella.org... In news:1hsejua.1hgmziv157ys7nN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk, SteveH <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wittered on forthwith; Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote: Slow. The 'plus' version is even worse. The 1.4 FSi has a 0-60 measured best on a sundial. One of the very few vehicles I've ever driven that has barely perceptible acceleration. The Golf SDi is another, the Rover non-turbo diesel 218 thing is possibly slower than a misfiring 2CV. Did you ever try a mk3 Golf with the 1.4 60ps motor? S-L-O-W- !!! |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Pete M" <pete.murray (AT) bogoffwithzepressedmeatblueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:ep5j9d$cf4$1 (AT) registered (DOT) motzarella.org... In news:1hsejua.1hgmziv157ys7nN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk, SteveH <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wittered on forthwith; Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote: Slow. The 'plus' version is even worse. The 1.4 FSi has a 0-60 measured best on a sundial. One of the very few vehicles I've ever driven that has barely perceptible acceleration. The Golf SDi is another, the Rover non-turbo diesel 218 thing is possibly slower than a misfiring 2CV. Did you ever try a mk3 Golf with the 1.4 60ps motor? S-L-O-W- !!! Tim.. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Tim.." <the.farm.hates.spam (AT) btinternet (DOT) com> wrote in message news:OPSdnVW9udDbxCvYnZ2dnUVZ8sWhnZ2d (AT) bt (DOT) com... "Pete M" <pete.murray (AT) bogoffwithzepressedmeatblueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:ep5j9d$cf4$1 (AT) registered (DOT) motzarella.org... In news:1hsejua.1hgmziv157ys7nN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk, SteveH <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wittered on forthwith; Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote: Slow. The 'plus' version is even worse. The 1.4 FSi has a 0-60 measured best on a sundial. One of the very few vehicles I've ever driven that has barely perceptible acceleration. The Golf SDi is another, the Rover non-turbo diesel 218 thing is possibly slower than a misfiring 2CV. Did you ever try a mk3 Golf with the 1.4 60ps motor? S-L-O-W- !!! Tim.. SWMBO has had a 60bhp Seat Ibiza for about 5 years now. It redfines slow. Strangely though, we have never felt the inclination to get rid of it. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Bob Sherunckle" <zilspeed (AT) beeteeopenworld (DOT) com> wrote in message news:6Kadndrcl4mAEivYnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d (AT) bt (DOT) com... SWMBO has had a 60bhp Seat Ibiza for about 5 years now. It redfines slow. Strangely though, we have never felt the inclination to get rid of it. We have acouple of Bitzer 1.4 75bhp's and to be honest their not slow at all! Easily keep up with yer common-or-garden Focus 1.6's. Amazing how the same engine can have split personalities... Tim.. |

#10
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |