AutosTalk Forums  

New Golf 1.6 FSI Mini Review.

Cars Modifications Aspects of car modifications (tuning, styling) (uk.rec.cars.modifications)


Discuss New Golf 1.6 FSI Mini Review. in the Cars Modifications forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Geoff
 
Posts: n/a

Default New Golf 1.6 FSI Mini Review. - 01-23-2007 , 09:01 AM






Slow.

--

Cheers, Geoff.
www.anoraks.uk.net

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
SteveH
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New Golf 1.6 FSI Mini Review. - 01-23-2007 , 11:44 AM






Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote:

Quote:
Slow.
The 'plus' version is even worse.
--
SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL
BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Justin Cole
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New Golf 1.6 FSI Mini Review. - 01-23-2007 , 01:01 PM



"SteveH" <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote:

Slow.

The 'plus' version is even worse.
Wouldn't be a great marketing ploy to called it the 'Golf Minus' would it?
;-)

Justin.




Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Pete M
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New Golf 1.6 FSI Mini Review. - 01-23-2007 , 01:11 PM



In news:1hsejua.1hgmziv157ys7nN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk,
SteveH <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wittered on forthwith;
Quote:
Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote:

Slow.

The 'plus' version is even worse.
The 1.4 FSi has a 0-60 measured best on a sundial. One of the very few
vehicles I've ever driven that has barely perceptible acceleration. The Golf
SDi is another, the Rover non-turbo diesel 218 thing is possibly slower than
a misfiring 2CV.


--
Pete M - Using the Scouse Side of the Force -
Golf GTi,
Mercedes 190E Auto
OMF#9

Ok, I admit it, I like Renault 5s.




Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Tim..
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New Golf 1.6 FSI Mini Review. - 01-23-2007 , 01:51 PM




"Pete M" <pete.murray (AT) bogoffwithzepressedmeatblueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in
message news:ep5j9d$cf4$1 (AT) registered (DOT) motzarella.org...
Quote:
In news:1hsejua.1hgmziv157ys7nN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk,
SteveH <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wittered on forthwith;
Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote:

Slow.

The 'plus' version is even worse.

The 1.4 FSi has a 0-60 measured best on a sundial. One of the very few
vehicles I've ever driven that has barely perceptible acceleration. The
Golf SDi is another, the Rover non-turbo diesel 218 thing is possibly
slower than a misfiring 2CV.

Did you ever try a mk3 Golf with the 1.4 60ps motor?

S-L-O-W- !!!

Tim..




Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Pete M
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New Golf 1.6 FSI Mini Review. - 01-23-2007 , 01:59 PM



In news:OPSdnVW9udDbxCvYnZ2dnUVZ8sWhnZ2d (AT) bt (DOT) com,
Tim.. <the.farm.hates.spam (AT) btinternet (DOT) com> wittered on forthwith;
Quote:
"Pete M" <pete.murray (AT) bogoffwithzepressedmeatblueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote
in message news:ep5j9d$cf4$1 (AT) registered (DOT) motzarella.org...
In news:1hsejua.1hgmziv157ys7nN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk,
SteveH <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wittered on forthwith;
Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote:

Slow.

The 'plus' version is even worse.

The 1.4 FSi has a 0-60 measured best on a sundial. One of the very
few vehicles I've ever driven that has barely perceptible
acceleration. The Golf SDi is another, the Rover non-turbo diesel
218 thing is possibly slower than a misfiring 2CV.


Did you ever try a mk3 Golf with the 1.4 60ps motor?

S-L-O-W- !!!
I drove a 1043 cc Mk2 Golf once, that wasn't quick...


--
Pete M - Using the Scouse Side of the Force -
Golf GTi,
Mercedes 190E Auto
OMF#9

Ok, I admit it, I like Renault 5s.




Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
Bob Sherunckle
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New Golf 1.6 FSI Mini Review. - 01-23-2007 , 05:41 PM




"Tim.." <the.farm.hates.spam (AT) btinternet (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"Pete M" <pete.murray (AT) bogoffwithzepressedmeatblueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in
message news:ep5j9d$cf4$1 (AT) registered (DOT) motzarella.org...
In news:1hsejua.1hgmziv157ys7nN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk,
SteveH <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wittered on forthwith;
Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote:

Slow.

The 'plus' version is even worse.

The 1.4 FSi has a 0-60 measured best on a sundial. One of the very few
vehicles I've ever driven that has barely perceptible acceleration. The
Golf SDi is another, the Rover non-turbo diesel 218 thing is possibly
slower than a misfiring 2CV.


Did you ever try a mk3 Golf with the 1.4 60ps motor?

S-L-O-W- !!!

Tim..


SWMBO has had a 60bhp Seat Ibiza for about 5 years now. It redfines slow.
Strangely though, we have never felt the inclination to get rid of it.





Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Tim..
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New Golf 1.6 FSI Mini Review. - 01-24-2007 , 05:17 AM




"Bob Sherunckle" <zilspeed (AT) beeteeopenworld (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"Tim.." <the.farm.hates.spam (AT) btinternet (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:OPSdnVW9udDbxCvYnZ2dnUVZ8sWhnZ2d (AT) bt (DOT) com...

"Pete M" <pete.murray (AT) bogoffwithzepressedmeatblueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in
message news:ep5j9d$cf4$1 (AT) registered (DOT) motzarella.org...
In news:1hsejua.1hgmziv157ys7nN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk,
SteveH <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wittered on forthwith;
Geoff <grt (AT) anoraks (DOT) uk.DELETE.net> wrote:

Slow.

The 'plus' version is even worse.

The 1.4 FSi has a 0-60 measured best on a sundial. One of the very few
vehicles I've ever driven that has barely perceptible acceleration. The
Golf SDi is another, the Rover non-turbo diesel 218 thing is possibly
slower than a misfiring 2CV.


Did you ever try a mk3 Golf with the 1.4 60ps motor?

S-L-O-W- !!!

Tim..



SWMBO has had a 60bhp Seat Ibiza for about 5 years now. It redfines slow.
Strangely though, we have never felt the inclination to get rid of it.
We have acouple of Bitzer 1.4 75bhp's and to be honest their not slow at
all! Easily keep up with yer common-or-garden Focus 1.6's.

Amazing how the same engine can have split personalities...

Tim..




Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
Albert T Cone
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New Golf 1.6 FSI Mini Review. - 01-24-2007 , 05:25 AM



Tim.. wrote:
Quote:
"Bob Sherunckle" <zilspeed (AT) beeteeopenworld (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:6Kadndrcl4mAEivYnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d (AT) bt (DOT) com...
SWMBO has had a 60bhp Seat Ibiza for about 5 years now. It redfines slow.
Strangely though, we have never felt the inclination to get rid of it.

We have acouple of Bitzer 1.4 75bhp's and to be honest their not slow at
all! Easily keep up with yer common-or-garden Focus 1.6's.

Amazing how the same engine can have split personalities...

Tim..
Er, but the 1.6 focus IS slow. Painfully so.


Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
Geoff
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New Golf 1.6 FSI Mini Review. - 01-24-2007 , 06:47 AM



SteveH wrote on Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:44:49 +0000:

??>> Slow.

S> The 'plus' version is even worse.

And it was worse on petrol them my old Impreza !

I used to use a tenners worth for a return trip to work in the Impreza, so I
put a tenner in the Golf even tho it was on a quarter of a tank, returned it
on fumes. Same other then the lack of performance is was quite a nice car,
for a poverty spec model.
--

Cheers, Geoff.
www.anoraks.uk.net



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.