AutosTalk Forums  

Nitrous(N20) / Nitrox(EANx)

Cars Modifications Aspects of car modifications (tuning, styling) (uk.rec.cars.modifications)


Discuss Nitrous(N20) / Nitrox(EANx) in the Cars Modifications forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Jezza
 
Posts: n/a

Default Nitrous(N20) / Nitrox(EANx) - 05-10-2004 , 10:01 AM






Now here's a thought.

There's a lot made about fitting Nitrous Kits to cars to boost the
performance. The idea behind it being (apologies if I'm wrong) the
added gas, Nitrous Oxide (N20), and the higher O2 contect in the air
(36%) when mixed with the correct fuel, gives more power. Plus the
cooling effect of the pressurised air stops the engine from cooking
itself.

Now how about instead of using Nitrox oxide we use Oxygen Enriched
Air, (EANx or Nitrox, as used by scuba-divers). Would it work? it
would certainly be cheaper (15Litre 36% O2 approx £5) and availablilty
would be far better (just go to your local dive shop!).

Now I need someone to calculate if it'll work. Here's what I think I
know so far.

N2O is a combined particle, 2 molecules nitrogen to 1 Oxygen.
EANx is a combination of N2 plus O2. That is the molecules are bonded
differently.

Anyone able to take it from here?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
MeatballTurbo
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Nitrous(N20) / Nitrox(EANx) - 05-10-2004 , 10:22 AM






In article <d16e1193.0405100601.462bf959 (AT) posting (DOT) google.com>,
jeremygill (AT) hotmail (DOT) com spouted forth into uk.rec.cars.modifications...
Quote:
Anyone able to take it from here?

Byrgerman, where are you wehn we need you.
--
Carl Robson
(The poster formerly known as Skodapilot)
http://www.bouncing-czechs.com


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Doki
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Nitrous(N20) / Nitrox(EANx) - 05-10-2004 , 10:23 AM





Jezza wrote:
Quote:
Now here's a thought.

There's a lot made about fitting Nitrous Kits to cars to boost the
performance. The idea behind it being (apologies if I'm wrong) the
added gas, Nitrous Oxide (N20), and the higher O2 contect in the air
(36%) when mixed with the correct fuel, gives more power. Plus the
cooling effect of the pressurised air stops the engine from cooking
itself.

Now how about instead of using Nitrox oxide we use Oxygen Enriched
Air, (EANx or Nitrox, as used by scuba-divers). Would it work? it
would certainly be cheaper (15Litre 36% O2 approx £5) and availablilty
would be far better (just go to your local dive shop!).

Now I need someone to calculate if it'll work. Here's what I think I
know so far.

N2O is a combined particle, 2 molecules nitrogen to 1 Oxygen.
EANx is a combination of N2 plus O2. That is the molecules are bonded
differently.

Anyone able to take it from here?
Safety would be your main problem. It's hard to get N2O insured as far as I
know, a mixture of N2 and O2 would be murder to insure. The thing is, N2O
doesn't split up into nitrogen and oxygen unless it's at 400 degrees or so,
whereas having lots of o2 just floating around is rather asking for fires to
start, if the system's at all leaky. If your car catches fire and the tank
ruptures, eventually n2o will start burning, but by the time temperatures
get to that point you should be well away, but if your car catches fire and
you've got o2 leaking, it'll go up much more quickly than it would in the
normal atmosphere. I know which car I'd sooner crash.




Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Johnny
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Nitrous(N20) / Nitrox(EANx) - 05-10-2004 , 11:27 AM




"Doki" <doki (AT) spamtroNspidar (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

Jezza wrote:
Now here's a thought.

There's a lot made about fitting Nitrous Kits to cars to boost the
performance. The idea behind it being (apologies if I'm wrong) the
added gas, Nitrous Oxide (N20), and the higher O2 contect in the air
(36%) when mixed with the correct fuel, gives more power. Plus the
cooling effect of the pressurised air stops the engine from cooking
itself.

Now how about instead of using Nitrox oxide we use Oxygen Enriched
Air, (EANx or Nitrox, as used by scuba-divers). Would it work? it
would certainly be cheaper (15Litre 36% O2 approx £5) and availablilty
would be far better (just go to your local dive shop!).

Now I need someone to calculate if it'll work. Here's what I think I
know so far.

N2O is a combined particle, 2 molecules nitrogen to 1 Oxygen.
EANx is a combination of N2 plus O2. That is the molecules are bonded
differently.

They're not bonded at all just mixed. N2 and O2 are independent, unless my
cse chemistry is wasted.
Quote:

Anyone able to take it from here?

Safety would be your main problem. It's hard to get N2O insured as far as
I
know, a mixture of N2 and O2 would be murder to insure. The thing is, N2O
doesn't split up into nitrogen and oxygen unless it's at 400 degrees or
so,
whereas having lots of o2 just floating around is rather asking for fires
to
start, if the system's at all leaky. If your car catches fire and the tank
ruptures, eventually n2o will start burning, but by the time temperatures
get to that point you should be well away, but if your car catches fire
and
you've got o2 leaking, it'll go up much more quickly than it would in the
normal atmosphere. I know which car I'd sooner crash.

Wouldn't the fact a gas as opposed to a liquid being pumped in limit the
gains as well.




Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Doki
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Nitrous(N20) / Nitrox(EANx) - 05-10-2004 , 11:36 AM





Johnny wrote:
Quote:
"Doki" <doki (AT) spamtroNspidar (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1084198826.31237.0 (AT) despina (DOT) uk.clara.net...


Jezza wrote:
Now here's a thought.

There's a lot made about fitting Nitrous Kits to cars to boost the
performance. The idea behind it being (apologies if I'm wrong) the
added gas, Nitrous Oxide (N20), and the higher O2 contect in the air
(36%) when mixed with the correct fuel, gives more power. Plus the
cooling effect of the pressurised air stops the engine from cooking
itself.

Now how about instead of using Nitrox oxide we use Oxygen Enriched
Air, (EANx or Nitrox, as used by scuba-divers). Would it work? it
would certainly be cheaper (15Litre 36% O2 approx £5) and
availablilty would be far better (just go to your local dive shop!).

Now I need someone to calculate if it'll work. Here's what I think I
know so far.

N2O is a combined particle, 2 molecules nitrogen to 1 Oxygen.
EANx is a combination of N2 plus O2. That is the molecules are
bonded differently.

They're not bonded at all just mixed. N2 and O2 are independent,
unless my cse chemistry is wasted.
Yep.

Quote:
Anyone able to take it from here?

Safety would be your main problem. It's hard to get N2O insured as
far as I know, a mixture of N2 and O2 would be murder to insure. The
thing is, N2O doesn't split up into nitrogen and oxygen unless it's
at 400 degrees or so, whereas having lots of o2 just floating around
is rather asking for fires to start, if the system's at all leaky.
If your car catches fire and the tank ruptures, eventually n2o will
start burning, but by the time temperatures get to that point you
should be well away, but if your car catches fire and you've got o2
leaking, it'll go up much more quickly than it would in the normal
atmosphere. I know which car I'd sooner crash.

Wouldn't the fact a gas as opposed to a liquid being pumped in limit
the gains as well.
Whether it's a gas or liquid depends on pressure / volume and temperature if
what I remember from chem / physics is right. Theoretically you could use n2
/ o2 mix, but volumetric efficiency isn't really the problem with nitrous.
You can get as much oxygen and fuel as you could possibly want in there with
nitrous, but the engine's going to break eventually if you make stupid
amounts of power.




Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
Doki
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Nitrous(N20) / Nitrox(EANx) - 05-10-2004 , 11:39 AM





Doki wrote:
Quote:
Johnny wrote:

Wouldn't the fact a gas as opposed to a liquid being pumped in limit
the gains as well.

Whether it's a gas or liquid depends on pressure / volume and
temperature if what I remember from chem / physics is right.
Theoretically you could use n2 / o2 mix, but volumetric efficiency
isn't really the problem with nitrous. You can get as much oxygen and
fuel as you could possibly want in there with nitrous, but the
engine's going to break eventually if you make stupid amounts of
power.
BTW, Burgerman might turn up and tell me I've been talking shite . I've
only read his webpage a few times, but he seems to know everything there is
to know on Nitrous.




Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
Depresion
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Nitrous(N20) / Nitrox(EANx) - 05-10-2004 , 11:51 AM




"Johnny" <repro007 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Wouldn't the fact a gas as opposed to a liquid being pumped in limit the
gains as well.
I would say that the pressure would tend to drop off a bit quicker also gases
tend to be more comprisable than liquids (have a look on Burgerman's site about
(iirc) positioning the jets and solenoids as he has a quick run over the
possible problems of the N2O being gaseous.




Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Johnny
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Nitrous(N20) / Nitrox(EANx) - 05-10-2004 , 11:58 AM




"Doki" <doki (AT) spamtroNspidar (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

Doki wrote:
Johnny wrote:

Wouldn't the fact a gas as opposed to a liquid being pumped in limit
the gains as well.

Whether it's a gas or liquid depends on pressure / volume and
temperature if what I remember from chem / physics is right.
Theoretically you could use n2 / o2 mix, but volumetric efficiency
isn't really the problem with nitrous. You can get as much oxygen and
fuel as you could possibly want in there with nitrous, but the
engine's going to break eventually if you make stupid amounts of
power.

BTW, Burgerman might turn up and tell me I've been talking shite . I've
only read his webpage a few times, but he seems to know everything there
is
to know on Nitrous.

Liquid just means many, many more molecules per unit volume than gas,
determined by the temperature or more practically pressure its stored at.
Obviously as soon as that pressure is released it'll boil to gas or whatever
it's properties dictate. Wouldn't fancy a bottle of liquid oxygen in the
boot though.




Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old   
Depresion
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Nitrous(N20) / Nitrox(EANx) - 05-10-2004 , 12:01 PM




"Johnny" <repro007 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
"Doki" <doki (AT) spamtroNspidar (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1084203354.33735.0 (AT) despina (DOT) uk.clara.net...


Doki wrote:
Johnny wrote:

Wouldn't the fact a gas as opposed to a liquid being pumped in limit
the gains as well.

Whether it's a gas or liquid depends on pressure / volume and
temperature if what I remember from chem / physics is right.
Theoretically you could use n2 / o2 mix, but volumetric efficiency
isn't really the problem with nitrous. You can get as much oxygen and
fuel as you could possibly want in there with nitrous, but the
engine's going to break eventually if you make stupid amounts of
power.

BTW, Burgerman might turn up and tell me I've been talking shite . I've
only read his webpage a few times, but he seems to know everything there
is
to know on Nitrous.

Liquid just means many, many more molecules per unit volume than gas,
determined by the temperature or more practically pressure its stored at.
Obviously as soon as that pressure is released it'll boil to gas or whatever
it's properties dictate. Wouldn't fancy a bottle of liquid oxygen in the
boot though.
When it goes through that phase change from liquid to gas it absorbs energy
from the surroundings cooling the intake air mailing it more dense, this is also
a good thing when it comes to engines.




Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old   
Johnny
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Nitrous(N20) / Nitrox(EANx) - 05-10-2004 , 01:10 PM




"Depresion" <blank (AT) 128 (DOT) 0.0.1> wrote

Quote:
"Johnny" <repro007 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:2g9n3hF9u56U1 (AT) uni-berlin (DOT) de...

"Doki" <doki (AT) spamtroNspidar (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1084203354.33735.0 (AT) despina (DOT) uk.clara.net...


Doki wrote:
Johnny wrote:

Wouldn't the fact a gas as opposed to a liquid being pumped in
limit
the gains as well.

Whether it's a gas or liquid depends on pressure / volume and
temperature if what I remember from chem / physics is right.
Theoretically you could use n2 / o2 mix, but volumetric efficiency
isn't really the problem with nitrous. You can get as much oxygen
and
fuel as you could possibly want in there with nitrous, but the
engine's going to break eventually if you make stupid amounts of
power.

BTW, Burgerman might turn up and tell me I've been talking shite .
I've
only read his webpage a few times, but he seems to know everything
there
is
to know on Nitrous.

Liquid just means many, many more molecules per unit volume than gas,
determined by the temperature or more practically pressure its stored
at.
Obviously as soon as that pressure is released it'll boil to gas or
whatever
it's properties dictate. Wouldn't fancy a bottle of liquid oxygen in the
boot though.

When it goes through that phase change from liquid to gas it absorbs
energy
from the surroundings cooling the intake air mailing it more dense, this
is also
a good thing when it comes to engines.

Yeah I'm really new to nitrous and trying to learn as much as I can as
quickly as I can (that's slowly BTW).
Would these obvious changes to the air density in the combustion chamber
have any knock on effect to the existing fuel system in my car? It has a
monitored fuel supply dictated by sensors that measure various parameters (I
wish I could be more specific). The ECU makes checks and adjustments many
times a second and I still can't fathom how introducing nitrous oxide and
extra fuel might affect this monitoring and the existing injected fuel
supply if at all.




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.