![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
"SteveH" <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:1hwzr26.1n4l0z4h7xp8kN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk... Elder <carl.robson (AT) bouncing-czechs (DOT) com> wrote: http://retrorides.proboards86.com/index.cgi? board=general&action=display&thread=1177001426 Crazy mad fucking greek fucker. Personally, I think the claims are a bit suspect. That's a fuck load of power to get from a N/A engine, even with those modifications. I'd have preferred to see a power at the wheels dyno graph, given the amount of fudging that can go on with converted 'flywheel' figures. -- SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo' www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC # Greater than 200 bhp per litre from a naturally aspirated low tech car engine? I dont deny its almost possible, but @ 11000 rpm??? The bigger the engine the smaller the peak power rpm. Peak power even on a 1 litre production race engine (like a bike engine) is generally 9750 to 10250 rpms... To get peak power at 11000+ on a almost two litre engine sounds extremely unlikely! Maybe its a calculated rpm (no hook up) on the dyno so rpm is grabbed/estimated/made up etc. I used to build dynos and there are loads that do that. And power could be err "optimistically" calibrated... |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
In news:N6QWh.9024$M_3.3188 (AT) newsfe1-gui (DOT) ntli.net, Burgerman <burgerman (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wittered on forthwith; "SteveH" <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:1hwzr26.1n4l0z4h7xp8kN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk... Elder <carl.robson (AT) bouncing-czechs (DOT) com> wrote: http://retrorides.proboards86.com/index.cgi? board=general&action=display&thread=1177001426 Crazy mad fucking greek fucker. Personally, I think the claims are a bit suspect. That's a fuck load of power to get from a N/A engine, even with those modifications. I'd have preferred to see a power at the wheels dyno graph, given the amount of fudging that can go on with converted 'flywheel' figures. -- SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo' www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC # Greater than 200 bhp per litre from a naturally aspirated low tech car engine? I dont deny its almost possible, but @ 11000 rpm??? The bigger the engine the smaller the peak power rpm. Peak power even on a 1 litre production race engine (like a bike engine) is generally 9750 to 10250 rpms... To get peak power at 11000+ on a almost two litre engine sounds extremely unlikely! Maybe its a calculated rpm (no hook up) on the dyno so rpm is grabbed/estimated/made up etc. I used to build dynos and there are loads that do that. And power could be err "optimistically" calibrated... F1 cars are normally aspirated and around 3 litre, they produce max power at something stupid like 17k rpm.. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
| http://retrorides.proboards86.com/index.cgi? board=general&action=display&thread=1177001426 Crazy mad fucking greek fucker. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
17:1 CR sounds a little high as well, (Isn't a GSXR 1l about 12.5:1 and a 'busa 11:1, unless it's actually a DERV). |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
17:1 CR sounds a little high as well, (Isn't a GSXR 1l about 12.5:1 and a 'busa 11:1, unless it's actually a DERV). That's what I was thinking - it's very close to diesel territory. Makes you wonder what kind of glow plugs he's running. |
#16
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
|
In article <xn0f5agg61pfqu001 (AT) nermal (DOT) unix-consult.com>, tnewsSPAMMENOT (AT) unixconsult (DOT) co.uk says... 17:1 CR sounds a little high as well, (Isn't a GSXR 1l about 12.5:1 and a 'busa 11:1, unless it's actually a DERV). That's what I was thinking - it's very close to diesel territory. Makes you wonder what kind of glow plugs he's running. 17/1 is not possible. |
|
big overlap on the camshafts, resulting in a very narrow powerband high up. No way that such an engine, the more on TB's, idles lower than 5000 RMP. |
|
His dynochart, bumpy beyond dreams, |
|
not possible for that kind of engine. |
|
heat and goodwill. If not: that Greek is now employed by either Cosworth, Ilmor or the motorbike race departement where he nicked the fuel from (but then he would not be Greek but Japanese). |
|
Look at the rad: standard MK2 Escort item, impossible that even on short runs that dissipates 1000-1200 HP in heat. 1200 Hp heat at low speed on such a radiator (a rallye-car lives below 100 mph) is called a grenade. |
|
Moneywise now: 4 pistons (3000 UKP), new rods (those are not Carillo's nor titanium, 1000 UKP), billet crankshaft (7000 UKP), specific camshafts (1000 UK), headwork and valves (3000 UKP), ecu (2000 UKP). Getting everything first time right won't be a problem for our Greek, but still it stays an engine worth a lot of cash with an estimated lifetime of 40 hours... and that fits as a glove in a oldtimer-rallye car worth 2 kUPD? Of course, Sir, they all do that around there, the trofee is worth that kind of money (every racer has his caves filled with those) BTCC 2l (like the Williams Laguna's, TWR Volvo's) on TB's were at 300 HP with serious budgets. |
|
car) will surpass specialised manufacturers on that scale? Yeah, in your wildest Greek dreams. |
|
With all respect to the NA Cosworth's: most struggle to break the 300 Hp-barrier. |
|
correct: 280-300 HP at the crank and below 7000 RPM nada (okay: 50 Hp) |
|
Tom De Moor |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
2.4L 90 degree V8. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 23 Apr, 01:56, usenet-u... (AT) malloc (DOT) co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: 2.4L 90 degree V8. Just out of interest, why do the govening body regulate the design of the engine - I understand the max. displacement, but why would they limit it to 90 degrees? |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
Iridium <iridiumdan (AT) googlemail (DOT) com> wrote: 2.5l V8s aren't they now? 2.4L 90 degree V8. And isn't 19krpm the max the rules allow? Last season some of them were going over 20krpm... AFAIR only 3.0 V10s have to have a rev limiter, and they can only be used if the team can prove they don't have a V8 available. |
#20
| |||||
| |||||
|
| / on 17/1 on drag engines. |
| Compression over 13/1 and such RPM impose a very big overlap on the camshafts, resulting in a very narrow powerband high up. No way that such an engine, the more on TB's, idles lower than 5000 RMP. Big compression alone helps pumping efficiency. Large overlap as you sugest need not be as large as you think. And while the idle may be rather lumpy and uneven it wouldnt be anyhing like 5k. 2.5 maybe. |
|
Look at the rad: standard MK2 Escort item, impossible that even on short runs that dissipates 1000-1200 HP in heat. 1200 Hp heat at low speed on such a radiator (a rallye-car lives below 100 mph) is called a grenade. that sentence made no sense. Overall efficiency of a Otto-engine is around 25%. If his engine pumps |
| Moneywise now: 4 pistons (3000 UKP), new rods (those are not Carillo's nor titanium, 1000 UKP), billet crankshaft (7000 UKP), specific camshafts (1000 UK), headwork and valves (3000 UKP), ecu (2000 UKP). Getting everything first time right won't be a problem for our Greek, but still it stays an engine worth a lot of cash with an estimated lifetime of 40 hours... and that fits as a glove in a oldtimer-rallye car worth 2 kUPD? Of course, Sir, they all do that around there, the trofee is worth that kind of money (every racer has his caves filled with those) BTCC 2l (like the Williams Laguna's, TWR Volvo's) on TB's were at 300 HP with serious budgets. Stock smooth running quiet civilised production bikes are doing 170bhp per litre remember. And 147 rear wheel... Thats 300 from 2 litres prodution and emmision controlled.AT THE WHEEL. |
| Now a Greek with no budget (see the rest of the car) will surpass specialised manufacturers on that scale? Yeah, in your wildest Greek dreams. aGREED. With all respect to the NA Cosworth's: most struggle to break the 300 Hp-barrier. yep, with bigger bores than the 1 litre bike engines 150 bhp per litre is about the best they can be expected to do. Realistic view about the engine and if the top-RPM is correct: 280-300 HP at the crank and below 7000 RPM nada (okay: 50 Hp) I dont believe it does those revs. I suspect "calculated or grabbed" rpm on the dyno and no proper electrical hookup. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |