![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <7h2tcqF2qseheU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net>, Miike G <postmaster (AT) miktoolman (DOT) plus.net> wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave (AT) davenoise (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:5099d4dba2dave (AT) davenoise (DOT) co.uk... In article <h8grbm$hri$1 (AT) news (DOT) eternal-september.org>, Pete M <pete.murray (AT) SPAMFREEblueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote: That would worry me. Sounds like heavy re-mastering. To make it sound like 'new' stuff. Which is generally overdone. Too bright. Depends what you like. I prefer this as it sounds more like it would in the studio as opposed to what you'd hear on vinyl. A properly made CD is effectively a clone of the master tape. Not so vinyl. My wife has quite a collection of the Beatles original LP's. Bought new and still in excellent condition. They still sound good to me, played on an old but good direct drive deck and amp.and, (at the time) expensive Leak speakers. Mike. Indeed. I've got all the original LPs and all the original CDs. The CDs sound to me exactly what I'd expect of a good dub from an analogue master. And quite a good demonstration of the beauty of CD. Listen to 'Michelle' on Rubber Soul. Shows all the LP artifacts being the last track on the side, but of course clean on CD. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a good collection of beatles stuff, up to now the pinnacle being my Dr Ebbetts remasters...from what I've heard of these new ones, I'll be getting them in short order. Mono first i think. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |