![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#131
| |||
| |||
|
|
In news:1ghc68c.9cn2ec65xdbkN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk, SteveH <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> decided to enlighten our sheltered souls with a rant as follows Peter Hill <peter.usenet1 (AT) nospam (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote: On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 22:27:50 +0100, steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk (SteveH) wrote: It's nothing more than a big 200SX. Which were _very_ dull. Father in Law had one. It was quick, and gripped, but it was a Nissan. Enough said. Bitch. S13 or 406 lookalike S14? Odd you say it gripped most people have problems keeping the backend in line. Erm, the first of the booted ones, IYSWIM. M-plated. The lack of tail-out action could be something to do with the slushomatic box, though. The manual ones certainly went quite well. I used one for a week or so when I worked for a Nissan main agent. (couldn't sell the fucking things y'see) |
#132
| |||
| |||
|
|
The manual ones certainly went quite well. I used one for a week or so when I worked for a Nissan main agent. (couldn't sell the fucking things y'see) I didn't like it at all. OK, it was fast, but it was so badly designed inside. The nearside wheelarch intruded far too much into the footwell, |
#133
| |||
| |||
|
|
In news:1ghc8gy.1x1ftjbqt3nN%steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk, SteveH <steve (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk> decided to enlighten our sheltered souls with a rant as follows The manual ones certainly went quite well. I used one for a week or so when I worked for a Nissan main agent. (couldn't sell the fucking things y'see) I didn't like it at all. OK, it was fast, but it was so badly designed inside. The nearside wheelarch intruded far too much into the footwell, Left hand drive was it? :-p |
#134
| |||
| |||
|
|
Heh... most of the miles in that car were spent in the passenger seat. Bloody horrible place to be. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |