![]() | |
#31
| |||
| |||
|
|
12, 13 maybe. Jesus... I've never got anything down that low. |
#32
| |||
| |||
|
|
JackH <jackhackettuk (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: 12, 13 maybe. Jesus... I've never got anything down that low. Not even trying. I got the XJR down to 3mpg. |
#33
| |||
| |||
|
|
Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote: JackH <jackhackettuk (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Having owned several Rovers / Hondas with lumps that like to have the tits revved off them, I can confirm it never gets tedious, Really? I had a 1.8 V~TEC Civic as a loaner while the garage replaced the coil pack and leads on the Exploder. The Civic got tedious after 60 miles. It's not the fact that it can be revved to 8k that gets tedious it's the fact that it has to be revved to 8k to make any progress. I'd imagine that, with the Lexus being Japanese and all that, it has all the character of a sewing maching, despite a silly redline. |
#34
| |||
| |||
|
| "Mike P" <privacy (AT) privacy (DOT) net> wrote in message news:6s7gn1F4k2rfU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net... I had a MK1 Civic Type-R as a company car for about 8 months back in 2003. It was fun for about a month, driving it like a tit , redlining it everywhere and it sounded great. Then it began to get quite tedious, because you couldn't make decent progress in it if you weren't caning it. I managed to foist it off on someone else and spent the rest of the time there driving a Golf GTDiesel. It was so much better for everyday driving. I can't stand it any more! I'd much rather be daily-driving an E63AMG even though it needs 7000 rpm on the clock to feel fast, or an M5, or an M3. We drive diesels because we're all too skint / tight to pay for big fuel bills. They are in no way any better to drive. *BINGO*. |
#35
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tim S Kemp wrote: "JackH" <jackhackettuk (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:6s7pfaF4b1kbU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net... They went rather well for a 1300, and were infinitely better reliability wise than the Rover S-Series engined 216 models. The main issue with either was rot. Yeah, kwik fit jacked straight through mine... LOL... I did that once to an Austin Maxi I owned for all of about three weeks, at which point it did me a favour and threw a rod. And the KV6... well.... Remind us all again how low you used to get the MPG down to on that. ;-) 12, 13 maybe. Jesus... I've never got anything down that low. Think the worst I've had was an XR4x4 2.9i, which I got down to 15mpg by caning it mercilessly round some twisties. Heh, I used to get more than that out of my twin turbo 2.9 4x4. |
#36
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
On Jan 2, 9:23 pm, st... (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk (SteveH) wrote: DanB <iridium... (AT) googlemail (DOT) com> wrote: That has more than 160bhp, though and something we'd recognise as torque.... To be fair, that's not unlike your 156 - only it's RWD, so an awesome real mans car or something. :-) Slower than my 156.... even though I have a Sillyspeed box ;-) Hmm, speed is relative... |
|
I'd take a longitudinal I6 over a transverse I4 any day... |
|
and my thoughts are not with the Alfa in terms of avoiding things that cost eleventy-million pounds to fix. |
|
This Carl fixation you have looks unhealthy, man. |
#37
| |||
| |||
|
|
Driving everywhere at 8k rpm becomes tedious? ;-) It's an age thing. It's well know that your acceptable rev limit for a car is inversely proportionate to your age. I look forward to the day that 2,000rpm becomes unnacceptably high. Look forward just as much to 11,000rpm out of the engine in the Sylva as well right enough... |
#38
| |||
| |||
|
|
SteveH wrote: Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote: JackH <jackhackettuk (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Having owned several Rovers / Hondas with lumps that like to have the tits revved off them, I can confirm it never gets tedious, Really? I had a 1.8 V~TEC Civic as a loaner while the garage replaced the coil pack and leads on the Exploder. The Civic got tedious after 60 miles. It's not the fact that it can be revved to 8k that gets tedious it's the fact that it has to be revved to 8k to make any progress. I'd imagine that, with the Lexus being Japanese and all that, it has all the character of a sewing maching, despite a silly redline. A girl I know has an old Civic VTEC something or other, it's the Rover 416 shape thing... |
#39
| |||
| |||
|
|
JackH wrote: Tim S Kemp wrote: And the KV6... well.... Remind us all again how low you used to get the MPG down to on that. ;-) 12, 13 maybe. Jesus... I've never got anything down that low. Think the worst I've had was an XR4x4 2.9i, which I got down to 15mpg by caning it mercilessly round some twisties. Heh, I used to get more than that out of my twin turbo 2.9 4x4. |
|
I don't manage anything near that good in the Rangie. |
#40
| |||
| |||
|
|
Douglas Payne <doug... (AT) cheerful (DOT) com> wrote: On Jan 2, 9:23 pm, st... (AT) italiancar (DOT) co.uk (SteveH) wrote: DanB <iridium... (AT) googlemail (DOT) com> wrote: That has more than 160bhp, though and something we'd recognise as torque.... To be fair, that's not unlike your 156 - only it's RWD, so an awesome real mans car or something. :-) Slower than my 156.... even though I have a Sillyspeed box ;-) Hmm, speed is relative, I'd take a longitudinal I6 over a transverse I4 any day and my thoughts are not with the Alfa in terms of avoiding things that cost eleventy-million pounds to fix. This Carl fixation you have looks unhealthy, man. I'm off to start a new thread: 'Cars that SteveH chooses are shit' Heh. The whole saga went on almost as long as my company car saga.... |
|
With lots of sensible ideas put forward. Then one of the least sensible choices possible was made. |
|
I think that's one thing most of us agree on. We even have the unlikely alignment of me, Jack H and seemingly Pete M all agreeing on this one ;-) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |