![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
This afternoon, I have been mostly ragging the arse off the Passat round a race track. |
|
Casualties: One big chip in the windscreen. |
|
I think it's fair to say I've finally fully explored the handling and braking limits, (as both the front pads and the edge of the front nearside tyre will testify), but overall the car did me proud, outpowering quite a few hot hatches down the straights and nipping up their insides on bends etc, so it wasn't exactly outclassed handling wise either. |
|
And I managed to shave just over a second off the best lap from the first session in the second thanks to listening to advice from other mates who do this sort of thing all the time and who gave me a few pointers on how to get the car round the track slightly quicker, so all in all I'm well impressed. goes off to look at suspension and braking mods |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"JackH" <jackhackettuk (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> writes: This afternoon, I have been mostly ragging the arse off the Passat round a race track. Found a certain bit of paper then? Casualties: One big chip in the windscreen. Oops. That's rather annoying. I think it's fair to say I've finally fully explored the handling and braking limits, (as both the front pads and the edge of the front nearside tyre will testify), but overall the car did me proud, outpowering quite a few hot hatches down the straights and nipping up their insides on bends etc, so it wasn't exactly outclassed handling wise either. Not bad, torque rules. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Timo Geusch" <tnewsSPAMMENOT (AT) unixconsult (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:m2tz4cwrw5.fsf (AT) unixconsult (DOT) co.uk... >"JackH" jackhackettuk (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> writes: This afternoon, I have been mostly ragging the arse off the Passat round a race track. Found a certain bit of paper then? Casualties: One big chip in the windscreen. Oops. That's rather annoying. I think it's fair to say I've finally fully explored the handling and braking limits, (as both the front pads and the edge of the front nearside tyre will testify), but overall the car did me proud, outpowering quite a few hot hatches down the straights and nipping up their insides on bends etc, so it wasn't exactly outclassed handling wise either. Not bad, torque rules. Apparently it doesn't. Not on a race track anyway where you really should be revving the nuts off anything which needs the nuts to be revved off it. |
|
Apparently it really is power that you need. |
.
#5
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
"JackH" <jackhackettuk (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> writes: This afternoon, I have been mostly ragging the arse off the Passat round a race track. Found a certain bit of paper then? |
|
Casualties: One big chip in the windscreen. Oops. That's rather annoying. |
|
I think it's fair to say I've finally fully explored the handling and braking limits, (as both the front pads and the edge of the front nearside tyre will testify), but overall the car did me proud, outpowering quite a few hot hatches down the straights and nipping up their insides on bends etc, so it wasn't exactly outclassed handling wise either. Not bad, torque rules. |
|
And I managed to shave just over a second off the best lap from the first session in the second thanks to listening to advice from other mates who do this sort of thing all the time and who gave me a few pointers on how to get the car round the track slightly quicker, so all in all I'm well impressed. goes off to look at suspension and braking mods Mod the driver instead first, and I don't mean at your local tattoo parlour. A book that was recommended to me is Skip Barber's "Going Faster". Certainly helped in my case, as did some training. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Bob Sherunckle wrote: "Timo Geusch" <tnewsSPAMMENOT (AT) unixconsult (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message Not bad, torque rules. Apparently it doesn't. Not on a race track anyway where you really should be revving the nuts off anything which needs the nuts to be revved off it. Depends. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Timo Geusch wrote: Bob Sherunckle wrote: "Timo Geusch" <tnewsSPAMMENOT (AT) unixconsult (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message Not bad, torque rules. Apparently it doesn't. Not on a race track anyway where you really should be revving the nuts off anything which needs the nuts to be revved off it. Depends. Points Sir at the Seat TDI BTCC cars of last season |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
JackH <jackhackettuk (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Timo Geusch wrote: Bob Sherunckle wrote: "Timo Geusch" <tnewsSPAMMENOT (AT) unixconsult (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message Not bad, torque rules. Apparently it doesn't. Not on a race track anyway where you really should be revving the nuts off anything which needs the nuts to be revved off it. Depends. Points Sir at the Seat TDI BTCC cars of last season points at the rather diesel friendly regulations |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
points at the rather diesel friendly regulations *shrug* Straight line they were invariably quicker. Cornering, they were slower due to the extra weight killing the handling and brakes. 'Swings and roundabouts', really. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
JackH <jackhackettuk (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote: points at the rather diesel friendly regulations *shrug* Straight line they were invariably quicker. Cornering, they were slower due to the extra weight killing the handling and brakes. 'Swings and roundabouts', really. Eh? The petrols were running with a weight penalty, as I recall. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |