![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#31
| |||
| |||
|
|
That would be interesting to see...IIRC Tata has been making some cars which are based on British designs of a number of years ago... They are okay in their home market, but dont really have a reputation that would inspire confidence. The Chinese might be able to do it, but realize that the American market can be fickle, and even with a desirable car of excellent quality, the incubation period can be extended. Both these nations, IMHO, have a problem with competition in the auto industry....for now. China is perhaps the most agressive nation in the world and will be a monster force in short time. |
#32
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Backyard Mechanic" <pettyfog (AT) yaywho (DOT) com> wrote in message news:Xns989B623301024pettyfogery (AT) 207 (DOT) 115.33.102... Agree EXACTLY on the value of Aerostar and Astro... they were BEST OF for many applications Didnt some of the Ford minivan series have some horrible problems with transmission failure, engine problems? Seems there were a lot of short runs on some of those trannies, maybe failures below 50 k miles? The minivan was a good solution for some families, but not all of them were, apparently, created equal. |
#33
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Joe" <Joe (AT) dontspam (DOT) net> wrote in message news:2u0hh.1101$ZK2.844 (AT) newsfe06 (DOT) lga... So rather than trying to fix the problem, they're getting out entirely. It's kind of amazing, really, that GM is the world's largest company and there are so many markets that they don't even sell to. They don't even care. For instance, they had unreliable junky diesel trucks that nobody would buy. They let that drag on forever. They didn't field a 4-door small (now considered mid-sized) SUV for a long time. They made a half-hearted effort with the stretched S-10, but that was just a pile of junk. They just watched while Jeep and Ford ran away with a huge market. How about this - no extended cab pickup until 1988. 15 years later to the market than the 2nd slowest. How about a competitor to the Mustang? Nope. Police car? Nope. How about something you could use for a Taxi? Nope. Actually, the Chevy Impala is used both as a taxi and cop car. For that matter, Corvettes, Camaros and Tahoes are used as polices vehicles, too. ... |
#34
| |||
| |||
|
|
Mike Hunter wrote: The is a difference between vehicles 'used' by police and 'police' vehicles. Naturally a police department car use whatever they choose for bicycles to Hummers, and the do. but that does not mean they are certified for patrol/pursuit work. There are one three vehicle sold in the US that are 'certified police vehicles.' The Ford Interceptor is by for the number one choice, by around 80%. Followed by Impala and the newly certified Dodge vehicle. There are a whole group of vehicles, mostly 4X4 that are sold for 'security' service, some of which have been mentioned. The explorer and the Jeep are the most often used. Of the departments we serviced, in six eastern states, many that bought FWD certified police cars, because they were a few thousand dollars less expensive and more fuel efficient, eventually when back to the Interceptor. Some like the Pa State Police, ban the use of FWD cars for pursuit work. I can certainly understand that. I am certain that the police Impalas have uprated suspension, etc. but the basic dynamics of the chassis is not so good for high speed handling. I've been told it's basically a stretched Lumina and it shows. Now my comments are based on the '05 and earlier, I have not driven the '06 yet. |
|
If I were expecting to be involved in pursuit driving, I would certainly want a purpose-built vehicle, not an uprated economy sedan. |
#35
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <FYmdnRsaDpMWKxnYnZ2dnUVZ_q2pnZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com>, "80 Knight" <NOMORESPAM (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: I am in Ontario, and we have Impala's as Police cars, as well as taxi's. Here in Vancouver the Impala is currently popular as an airport cab, but the Toyota Corolla is increasingly becoming very common for in town taxis and even airport use. |
|
A few months ago 4 of us each with a checked bag and a carry on, were brought home from the airport in a Corolla. It's large space for a smaller car surprised me; fortunately the three smaller people took the rear seat and I got the very spacious front seat. |
#36
| |||
| |||
|
|
Jeff wrote: "Joe" <Joe (AT) dontspam (DOT) net> wrote in message news:2u0hh.1101$ZK2.844 (AT) newsfe06 (DOT) lga... So rather than trying to fix the problem, they're getting out entirely. It's kind of amazing, really, that GM is the world's largest company and there are so many markets that they don't even sell to. They don't even care. For instance, they had unreliable junky diesel trucks that nobody would buy. They let that drag on forever. They didn't field a 4-door small (now considered mid-sized) SUV for a long time. They made a half-hearted effort with the stretched S-10, but that was just a pile of junk. They just watched while Jeep and Ford ran away with a huge market. How about this - no extended cab pickup until 1988. 15 years later to the market than the 2nd slowest. How about a competitor to the Mustang? Nope. Police car? Nope. How about something you could use for a Taxi? Nope. Actually, the Chevy Impala is used both as a taxi and cop car. For that matter, Corvettes, Camaros and Tahoes are used as polices vehicles, too. ... Impalas make a bad taxi, and an even worse cop car. |
#37
| |||
| |||
|
|
I was actually talking with an Officer in a near-by town who had Dodge Charger interceptor's. I asked him what him and his officers preferred, the Charger, the Crown Vic, or the Impala. He said the Impala is the most popular, followed by the Crown Vic, and then the Charger. I guess it is a matter of preference. |
#38
| |||
| |||
|
|
"80 Knight" <NOMORESPAM (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:gf-dna4zHvnWBhvYnZ2dnUVZ_qGjnZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com... ... I was actually talking with an Officer in a near-by town who had Dodge Charger interceptor's. I asked him what him and his officers preferred, the Charger, the Crown Vic, or the Impala. He said the Impala is the most popular, followed by the Crown Vic, and then the Charger. I guess it is a matter of preference. The Charger is by far the coolest looking. |
|
Not that that matters as much to the cops in the cars. |
|
I saw a couple in NYC. Way cool. The NYPD was testing them. They had V6 for city patrols and a V8 got highway patrols. |
#39
| |||
| |||
|
|
Mike Hunter wrote: The is a difference between vehicles 'used' by police and 'police' vehicles. Naturally a police department car use whatever they choose for bicycles to Hummers, and the do. but that does not mean they are certified for patrol/pursuit work. There are one three vehicle sold in the US that are 'certified police vehicles.' The Ford Interceptor is by for the number one choice, by around 80%. Followed by Impala and the newly certified Dodge vehicle. There are a whole group of vehicles, mostly 4X4 that are sold for 'security' service, some of which have been mentioned. The explorer and the Jeep are the most often used. Of the departments we serviced, in six eastern states, many that bought FWD certified police cars, because they were a few thousand dollars less expensive and more fuel efficient, eventually when back to the Interceptor. Some like the Pa State Police, ban the use of FWD cars for pursuit work. I can certainly understand that. I am certain that the police Impalas have uprated suspension, etc. but the basic dynamics of the chassis is not so good for high speed handling. I've been told it's basically a stretched Lumina and it shows. Now my comments are based on the '05 and earlier, I have not driven the '06 yet. If I were expecting to be involved in pursuit driving, I would certainly want a purpose-built vehicle, not an uprated economy sedan. nate |
#40
| |||
| |||
|
|
Steve wrote: Jeff wrote: "Steve" <no (AT) spam (DOT) thanks> wrote in message news:7sWdnVwdMLAzjxnYnZ2dnUVZ_v-tnZ2d (AT) texas (DOT) net... N8N wrote: ow out. The retarded thing is that GM killed the Astro van which was a favorite of service techs everywhere and had a little niche all its own. What the hell were they thinking? There's no other vehicle to compete with it, it still sold, and yet they axed it. I disagree. I'm guessing they got out BECAUSE there was another vehicle to compete with it, and one that took the whole market lock stock and barrel when it debuted: the Dodge Sprinter. With the option of a small Benz diesel in addition to the full line of gasoline engines and a very adaptable body, it pretty well blew the Astro into the weeds. The Dodge Sprinter is a full-size van. The Astro is a mini-van. They are in different market segments. Not really. The Astro is about as big as a "full size" van of the 70s, on a little bit shorter wheelbase. The Sprinter is bigger, but still smaller than the B-series it replaced, let alone the Ford E-series. Its a delivery/fleet van, which is exactly what the Astro had morphed into despite being created as a family "mini" van. It just wasn't very "mini" and had the same miserable driver's seating position as full-size RWD vans because of the engine "doghouse" being in the way. The odd thing is that of all those, the Dodge B-series was the most pleasant to drive IMHO (I have not driven the Sprinter though.) The only fault I could find with them was that they went through brakes like mad, and I recall one incident with a lower ball joint failure on one, but they were used hard on poor city roads. I found the Ford E-series to feel very ponderous. nate |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |