![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
I saw many comments on the ng and to me seems out of the actual motor industry contest, with pride and prejudice against what could be the last chance for chrysler. a) Chrysler was an almost dead company. Cerberus had almost put to death the company without any project or plan for the future It's a miracle someone want make a try to save Chrysler with the world of motors in such dire situtation, where make profits seems to be a mirage. So were several auto companies almost dead. Their Gov saved them. |
|
b)Marchionne has done a great work for fiat, this isn't an assurance he can reply them in chrysler, but at least he's the right man for the task. The prejudice for Marchionne is out of place. Marchionne is OK as far as I can see. |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
The Fiat problem is lack of cars that would sell well here. Now if Opel cars could be obtained, there would be hope. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Chrysler does not need small-car technology - ESPECIALLY SMALL CAR TECHNOLOGY THAT WILL TAKE 2.5 YEARS TO HIT THE SHOW ROOM AND BE MADE MOSTLY IN ITALY AND MEXICO. Chrysler can use Fiat's technology for improved fuel mileage, but I |
|
Chrysler needs a more economical sedan platform. Their current one is too heavy and they have too many sedans offered only in RWD. Right on, Chrysler has blown the mid sized FWD market they had a |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
If Fiat has licked the quality problems -- not a sure thing -- they have the larger Fiats and Alfa-Romeos (very stylish cars). |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
That's what I was looking for over the previous two years, Chrysler didn't have a product I desired. The first time Chrysler's products didn't meet my needs since they came out with FWD many years ago. The downturn was in 2005 when they came out with the 300 which sells to a different market and has done well. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |