AutosTalk Forums  

incredible pics from Palm Beach

Ferrari Discussions About Ferrari Cars (alt.autos.ferrari)


Discuss incredible pics from Palm Beach in the Ferrari forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old   
Cogentin
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: incredible pics from Palm Beach - 02-13-2006 , 02:13 PM






Creamy Goodness wrote:

Quote:
Jezzus...

Per
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...tem.php&rid=88

"No search results for '365 california'. Try to rephrase your query
and search again."

There were 14 365 Californias, at least five different taillight
treatments, not one of them a SPIDER.

..."Original Ferrari V-12 1965-1973", Keith Bluemel, Motorbooks
International , 1999.

...There is no "y" in the Italian alphabet.
On the top of the page featuring the photo it said "Ferrari 365
California Spyder". I cut and pasted it. At this point I don't give a
fuck if it was called "Baloney Sandwich", all I wanted to know about was
the taillight treatments. I sent the pic to your email, anyway.

Sorry, bad mood. Today is one day I wish all children under the age of
18 could be rounded up and exterminated. Fucking blight on society. I'm
certain that tomorrow I will feel differently.


--
If you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck
Norris you may be only seconds away from death.



Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old   
Eskalith
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: incredible pics from Palm Beach - 03-17-2006 , 01:17 AM






Paul Duffin wrote:

Quote:
Guns.. Have you seen the film 'Crash' ?

-Paul

Hey buddy!



Hey Buddy! It's good. Sad, but good. A little unbelievable in parts, but
well observed and absorbing

-Paul
Maybe you should try the other one then, the one with James Spader.

--
If you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck
Norris you may be only seconds away from death.



Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old   
matt borland
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: incredible pics from Palm Beach - 03-17-2006 , 01:40 PM




"Eskalith" <user (AT) example (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
Paul Duffin wrote:


Guns.. Have you seen the film 'Crash' ?

-Paul

Hey buddy!



Hey Buddy! It's good. Sad, but good. A little unbelievable in parts, but
well observed and absorbing

-Paul

Maybe you should try the other one then, the one with James Spader.

--
If you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck
Norris you may be only seconds away from death.


Funny thing is, at first I thought that was the one he was talking about...



-Matt- "..."




Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old   
Paul Duffin
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: incredible pics from Palm Beach - 03-17-2006 , 02:25 PM



"matt borland" <mborland (AT) columbus (DOT) rr.com> wrote

Quote:
Maybe you should try the other one then, the one with James Spader.

--
If you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck
Norris you may be only seconds away from death.



Funny thing is, at first I thought that was the one he was talking
about...

No, no, no - we did the whole David Cronenberg, (based on the novel by
JG Ballard) 'Crash' discussion years ago.

This is in fact a recent remake - featuring a different director,
different cast and different story (and not based on the novel by JG
Ballard... ....although it may be that some of the cast had seen the
original... ...however it's difficult to determine whether their
performances were driven in any by the experience... ....I dunno, ask Mr
Spielberg [tee-hee!]).

Anyway, it's a good film and I'd be interested in the views of you good
gun-toting folk (whom I only refer to as 'good' due to the gun-toting
bit... never upset an American with a gun. Actkshully, I married an
American with a gun, so I pretty much have to watch myself 24/7... I
just hope tonight's lasagne goes down well... ).


-McPauloD





Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old   
matt borland
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: incredible pics from Palm Beach - 03-17-2006 , 07:19 PM




"Paul Duffin" <someone (AT) somewhere (DOT) com> wrote in message

Quote:
Anyway, it's a good film and I'd be interested in the views of you good
gun-toting folk (whom I only refer to as 'good' due to the gun-toting
bit... never upset an American with a gun. Actkshully, I married an
American with a gun, so I pretty much have to watch myself 24/7... I
just hope tonight's lasagne goes down well... ).


-McPauloD
I find the vast majority of gun portrayal in cinema
to be aggravating at best. They tend to have major
technical flaws, like a guy repeatedly pumping an
obviously empty shotgun followed by him firing a
shot with it, which is impossible. Other gun-in-media
flubs that are common are law enforcement officers
in movies and on TV breaking all the rules of gun
safety, showing civilians sporting fully automatic
weapons (which are available to them, but they
cost over $10k and you have to jump through several
bureaucratic hoops to obtain one), and my personal
favorite, the gun that apparently holds 900 rounds
because they fire that much and never reload.

Guns and gun owners are rarely portrayed with any
accuracy in movies, which isn't surprising since last
time I checked Hollywood was still located in the
People's Republic of Kalifornia...

I could rant for hours on this one, but I'd better just
relax and have another Smithwicks...



-Matt- "Blaming guns for crime is like blaming spoons
for making Rosie O'Donnell fat."





Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.