AutosTalk Forums  

Blowers - which one?

Ford Mustang Discussions About Ford Mustangs in all their flavours (rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang)


Discuss Blowers - which one? in the Ford Mustang forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Michael Johnson
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Blowers - which one? - 01-17-2007 , 11:48 AM






BradandBrooks wrote:
Quote:
"Michael Johnson" <cds (AT) erols (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:7fidnRIEgomUaTHYnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com...
BradandBrooks wrote:
"Gill" <gilles1nospam (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:Bd-dnd_6idcBuDHYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...
BradandBrooks wrote:
"Bob A" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:45ab0f62$0$97248$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) yellow.readfreenews.net...
"BradandBrooks" <BradandBrooks (AT) shaw (DOT) ca> wrote in message
news:fxoqh.647439$1T2.227792 (AT) pd7urf2no (DOT) ..
1993 GT, stock, 5-spd, 2.73s, cat-back, timing bump. Going this route
and got it narrowed down to two:


Vortech V-2 SQ S-Trim

or

Paxton NOVI 2000


Thanks.

Brad
checkout Keene Bell too,
you get full boost at about 1,700 RPM,
the others have to spin up and get to full boost about 4,000 RPM when
the engine is wound up
Big difference in driving, lots of tourqe at low end with the KB,
I have one on my 5.0 1993 LX ex cop car driving since about 97, no
problems

Well, I like the Novi too, but doesn't the Keene Bell make it hard to
hook-up?

Brad


Hook-up, as in like launching off the line?
There's of chassis and drive train work to do yet.
Also, doesn't you motor have hypereutectic pistons? They tend to break
easily under detonation. A good tune will keep you out of that.

To get traction... the low rpm power seems like it would just break the
tires loose constantly.
I have a Kenne Bell on my 89 LX. The throttle response is fantastic with
a twin screw blower and very controllable. It is no different than
running a high revving big block engine.

Okay.... never ridden in one of those before. I am going to look into it.
Thanks.
With a Kenne Bell your car will drive the same as it does now except
your torque curve will raise 100-150 ft-lbs across the entire rpm range.
I like them because they deliver a substantial performance gain at all
rpm levels and not just above 4500-5000 rpm like a centrifugal. The
reason for this is that a twin screw blower will make its full rated
boost amount from rpm to redline whereas the boost made by a centrifugal
is dependent on the rpm rate.

If you have any questions about the KB setup on a 5.0L ask away. I know
quite a bit about getting the most from these kits. I have run mine all
the way up to 16 psi of boost.


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
BradandBrooks
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Blowers - which one? - 01-18-2007 , 12:53 AM







"Michael Johnson" <cds (AT) erols (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
BradandBrooks wrote:
"Michael Johnson" <cds (AT) erols (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:7fidnRIEgomUaTHYnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com...
BradandBrooks wrote:
"Gill" <gilles1nospam (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:Bd-dnd_6idcBuDHYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...
BradandBrooks wrote:
"Bob A" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:45ab0f62$0$97248$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) yellow.readfreenews.net...
"BradandBrooks" <BradandBrooks (AT) shaw (DOT) ca> wrote in message
news:fxoqh.647439$1T2.227792 (AT) pd7urf2no (DOT) ..
1993 GT, stock, 5-spd, 2.73s, cat-back, timing bump. Going this
route and got it narrowed down to two:


Vortech V-2 SQ S-Trim

or

Paxton NOVI 2000


Thanks.

Brad
checkout Keene Bell too,
you get full boost at about 1,700 RPM,
the others have to spin up and get to full boost about 4,000 RPM
when the engine is wound up
Big difference in driving, lots of tourqe at low end with the KB,
I have one on my 5.0 1993 LX ex cop car driving since about 97, no
problems

Well, I like the Novi too, but doesn't the Keene Bell make it hard to
hook-up?

Brad


Hook-up, as in like launching off the line?
There's of chassis and drive train work to do yet.
Also, doesn't you motor have hypereutectic pistons? They tend to break
easily under detonation. A good tune will keep you out of that.

To get traction... the low rpm power seems like it would just break the
tires loose constantly.
I have a Kenne Bell on my 89 LX. The throttle response is fantastic
with a twin screw blower and very controllable. It is no different than
running a high revving big block engine.

Okay.... never ridden in one of those before. I am going to look into it.
Thanks.

With a Kenne Bell your car will drive the same as it does now except your
torque curve will raise 100-150 ft-lbs across the entire rpm range. I like
them because they deliver a substantial performance gain at all rpm levels
and not just above 4500-5000 rpm like a centrifugal. The reason for this
is that a twin screw blower will make its full rated boost amount from rpm
to redline whereas the boost made by a centrifugal is dependent on the rpm
rate.

If you have any questions about the KB setup on a 5.0L ask away. I know
quite a bit about getting the most from these kits. I have run mine all
the way up to 16 psi of boost.
Hi, thanks for the info. No, no questions at this time... but let me look
and I'm sure I'll be back.

Brad




Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
sweetkygirl784@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Blowers - which one? - 01-21-2007 , 12:16 AM



Are you the Michael Johnson who was/is looking for his father in
Bowling Green, Kentucky??? Charles M. Johnson III???? This man is my
father-in-law. Please email me at sweetkygirl784 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com.



Michael Johnson wrote:
Quote:
BradandBrooks wrote:
"Michael Johnson" <cds (AT) erols (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:7fidnRIEgomUaTHYnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com...
BradandBrooks wrote:
"Gill" <gilles1nospam (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:Bd-dnd_6idcBuDHYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...
BradandBrooks wrote:
"Bob A" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:45ab0f62$0$97248$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) yellow.readfreenews.net...
"BradandBrooks" <BradandBrooks (AT) shaw (DOT) ca> wrote in message
news:fxoqh.647439$1T2.227792 (AT) pd7urf2no (DOT) ..
1993 GT, stock, 5-spd, 2.73s, cat-back, timing bump. Going this route
and got it narrowed down to two:


Vortech V-2 SQ S-Trim

or

Paxton NOVI 2000


Thanks.

Brad
checkout Keene Bell too,
you get full boost at about 1,700 RPM,
the others have to spin up and get to full boost about 4,000 RPM when
the engine is wound up
Big difference in driving, lots of tourqe at low end with the KB,
I have one on my 5.0 1993 LX ex cop car driving since about 97, no
problems

Well, I like the Novi too, but doesn't the Keene Bell make it hard to
hook-up?

Brad


Hook-up, as in like launching off the line?
There's of chassis and drive train work to do yet.
Also, doesn't you motor have hypereutectic pistons? They tend to break
easily under detonation. A good tune will keep you out of that.

To get traction... the low rpm power seems like it would just break the
tires loose constantly.
I have a Kenne Bell on my 89 LX. The throttle response is fantastic with
a twin screw blower and very controllable. It is no different than
running a high revving big block engine.

Okay.... never ridden in one of those before. I am going to look into it.
Thanks.

With a Kenne Bell your car will drive the same as it does now except
your torque curve will raise 100-150 ft-lbs across the entire rpm range.
I like them because they deliver a substantial performance gain at all
rpm levels and not just above 4500-5000 rpm like a centrifugal. The
reason for this is that a twin screw blower will make its full rated
boost amount from rpm to redline whereas the boost made by a centrifugal
is dependent on the rpm rate.

If you have any questions about the KB setup on a 5.0L ask away. I know
quite a bit about getting the most from these kits. I have run mine all
the way up to 16 psi of boost.


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
Michael Johnson
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Blowers - which one? - 01-21-2007 , 12:26 PM



On the odd chance this is a legitimate post, I'm not the person you are
looking for. My father died many years ago and his name wasn't Charles.
Sorry.

sweetkygirl784 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Quote:
Are you the Michael Johnson who was/is looking for his father in
Bowling Green, Kentucky??? Charles M. Johnson III???? This man is my
father-in-law. Please email me at sweetkygirl784 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com.



Michael Johnson wrote:
BradandBrooks wrote:
"Michael Johnson" <cds (AT) erols (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:7fidnRIEgomUaTHYnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com...
BradandBrooks wrote:
"Gill" <gilles1nospam (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:Bd-dnd_6idcBuDHYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...
BradandBrooks wrote:
"Bob A" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:45ab0f62$0$97248$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) yellow.readfreenews.net...
"BradandBrooks" <BradandBrooks (AT) shaw (DOT) ca> wrote in message
news:fxoqh.647439$1T2.227792 (AT) pd7urf2no (DOT) ..
1993 GT, stock, 5-spd, 2.73s, cat-back, timing bump. Going this route
and got it narrowed down to two:


Vortech V-2 SQ S-Trim

or

Paxton NOVI 2000


Thanks.

Brad
checkout Keene Bell too,
you get full boost at about 1,700 RPM,
the others have to spin up and get to full boost about 4,000 RPM when
the engine is wound up
Big difference in driving, lots of tourqe at low end with the KB,
I have one on my 5.0 1993 LX ex cop car driving since about 97, no
problems

Well, I like the Novi too, but doesn't the Keene Bell make it hard to
hook-up?

Brad


Hook-up, as in like launching off the line?
There's of chassis and drive train work to do yet.
Also, doesn't you motor have hypereutectic pistons? They tend to break
easily under detonation. A good tune will keep you out of that.

To get traction... the low rpm power seems like it would just break the
tires loose constantly.
I have a Kenne Bell on my 89 LX. The throttle response is fantastic with
a twin screw blower and very controllable. It is no different than
running a high revving big block engine.
Okay.... never ridden in one of those before. I am going to look into it.
Thanks.
With a Kenne Bell your car will drive the same as it does now except
your torque curve will raise 100-150 ft-lbs across the entire rpm range.
I like them because they deliver a substantial performance gain at all
rpm levels and not just above 4500-5000 rpm like a centrifugal. The
reason for this is that a twin screw blower will make its full rated
boost amount from rpm to redline whereas the boost made by a centrifugal
is dependent on the rpm rate.

If you have any questions about the KB setup on a 5.0L ask away. I know
quite a bit about getting the most from these kits. I have run mine all
the way up to 16 psi of boost.


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
WindsorFox
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Blowers - which one? - 01-21-2007 , 04:41 PM



Michael Johnson wrote:
Quote:
On the odd chance this is a legitimate post, I'm not the person you are
looking for. My father died many years ago and his name wasn't Charles.
Sorry.

sweetkygirl784 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Are you the Michael Johnson who was/is looking for his father in
Bowling Green, Kentucky??? Charles M. Johnson III???? This man is my
father-in-law. Please email me at sweetkygirl784 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com.
Dude, your long lost ex-wife??? LOL!

--
I used to have abs. Now, I've just got ab.
One big ol' Ab. - BigSkiff www.titanspot.com

Pyongyang sounds more like the sound effect an ACME catapult makes
as it goes off at precisely the wrong moment for Wile E. Coyote. -
Cadbury Moose


Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
Michael Johnson
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Blowers - which one? - 01-21-2007 , 05:53 PM



WindsorFox wrote:
Quote:
Michael Johnson wrote:
On the odd chance this is a legitimate post, I'm not the person you
are looking for. My father died many years ago and his name wasn't
Charles. Sorry.

sweetkygirl784 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Are you the Michael Johnson who was/is looking for his father in
Bowling Green, Kentucky??? Charles M. Johnson III???? This man is my
father-in-law. Please email me at sweetkygirl784 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com.

Dude, your long lost ex-wife??? LOL!
How may people with the name of "Michael Johnson" exist in this world?
More than I few I would guess. The odds of me being THE Michael Johnson
she is looking for is beyond remote. Although, meeting a 22 year old
sweet KY girl may not be a bad thing, if my wife doesn't care.


Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
sweetkygirl784@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Blowers - which one? - 01-21-2007 , 06:39 PM



This was a legitimate post and I do know that there are several million
Michael Johnson's in the world. The Michael Johnson I am looking for
has posted on here, I was just trying to get someone's attention and I
did. Thanks for all who responded.

On Jan 21, 4:53 pm, Michael Johnson <c... (AT) erols (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
WindsorFox wrote:
Michael Johnson wrote:
On the odd chance this is a legitimate post, I'm not the person you
are looking for. My father died many years ago and his name wasn't
Charles. Sorry.

sweetkygirl... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Are you the Michael Johnson who was/is looking for his father in
Bowling Green, Kentucky??? Charles M. Johnson III???? This man is my
father-in-law. Please email me at sweetkygirl... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com.

Dude, your long lost ex-wife??? LOL!How may people with the name of "Michael Johnson" exist in this world?
More than I few I would guess. The odds of me being THE Michael Johnson
she is looking for is beyond remote. Although, meeting a 22 year old
sweet KY girl may not be a bad thing, if my wife doesn't care.


Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
WindsorFox
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Blowers - which one? - 01-21-2007 , 11:31 PM



Michael Johnson wrote:
Quote:
WindsorFox wrote:
Michael Johnson wrote:
On the odd chance this is a legitimate post, I'm not the person you
are looking for. My father died many years ago and his name wasn't
Charles. Sorry.

sweetkygirl784 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Are you the Michael Johnson who was/is looking for his father in
Bowling Green, Kentucky??? Charles M. Johnson III???? This man is my
father-in-law. Please email me at sweetkygirl784 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com.

Dude, your long lost ex-wife??? LOL!

How may people with the name of "Michael Johnson" exist in this world?
More than I few I would guess. The odds of me being THE Michael Johnson
she is looking for is beyond remote. Although, meeting a 22 year old
sweet KY girl may not be a bad thing, if my wife doesn't care.
Don't ask before you goto sleep.... :-P

--
"One hard rule of sockpuppetry is that a sockpuppet
can't be smarter than its animator."
- Arny Krueger


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.