![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Michael Johnson" <cds (AT) erols (DOT) com> wrote in message news:7fidnRIEgomUaTHYnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com... BradandBrooks wrote: "Gill" <gilles1nospam (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message news:Bd-dnd_6idcBuDHYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com... BradandBrooks wrote: "Bob A" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message news:45ab0f62$0$97248$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) yellow.readfreenews.net... "BradandBrooks" <BradandBrooks (AT) shaw (DOT) ca> wrote in message news:fxoqh.647439$1T2.227792 (AT) pd7urf2no (DOT) .. 1993 GT, stock, 5-spd, 2.73s, cat-back, timing bump. Going this route and got it narrowed down to two: Vortech V-2 SQ S-Trim or Paxton NOVI 2000 Thanks. Brad checkout Keene Bell too, you get full boost at about 1,700 RPM, the others have to spin up and get to full boost about 4,000 RPM when the engine is wound up Big difference in driving, lots of tourqe at low end with the KB, I have one on my 5.0 1993 LX ex cop car driving since about 97, no problems Well, I like the Novi too, but doesn't the Keene Bell make it hard to hook-up? Brad Hook-up, as in like launching off the line? There's of chassis and drive train work to do yet. Also, doesn't you motor have hypereutectic pistons? They tend to break easily under detonation. A good tune will keep you out of that. To get traction... the low rpm power seems like it would just break the tires loose constantly. I have a Kenne Bell on my 89 LX. The throttle response is fantastic with a twin screw blower and very controllable. It is no different than running a high revving big block engine. Okay.... never ridden in one of those before. I am going to look into it. Thanks. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
BradandBrooks wrote: "Michael Johnson" <cds (AT) erols (DOT) com> wrote in message news:7fidnRIEgomUaTHYnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com... BradandBrooks wrote: "Gill" <gilles1nospam (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message news:Bd-dnd_6idcBuDHYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com... BradandBrooks wrote: "Bob A" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message news:45ab0f62$0$97248$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) yellow.readfreenews.net... "BradandBrooks" <BradandBrooks (AT) shaw (DOT) ca> wrote in message news:fxoqh.647439$1T2.227792 (AT) pd7urf2no (DOT) .. 1993 GT, stock, 5-spd, 2.73s, cat-back, timing bump. Going this route and got it narrowed down to two: Vortech V-2 SQ S-Trim or Paxton NOVI 2000 Thanks. Brad checkout Keene Bell too, you get full boost at about 1,700 RPM, the others have to spin up and get to full boost about 4,000 RPM when the engine is wound up Big difference in driving, lots of tourqe at low end with the KB, I have one on my 5.0 1993 LX ex cop car driving since about 97, no problems Well, I like the Novi too, but doesn't the Keene Bell make it hard to hook-up? Brad Hook-up, as in like launching off the line? There's of chassis and drive train work to do yet. Also, doesn't you motor have hypereutectic pistons? They tend to break easily under detonation. A good tune will keep you out of that. To get traction... the low rpm power seems like it would just break the tires loose constantly. I have a Kenne Bell on my 89 LX. The throttle response is fantastic with a twin screw blower and very controllable. It is no different than running a high revving big block engine. Okay.... never ridden in one of those before. I am going to look into it. Thanks. With a Kenne Bell your car will drive the same as it does now except your torque curve will raise 100-150 ft-lbs across the entire rpm range. I like them because they deliver a substantial performance gain at all rpm levels and not just above 4500-5000 rpm like a centrifugal. The reason for this is that a twin screw blower will make its full rated boost amount from rpm to redline whereas the boost made by a centrifugal is dependent on the rpm rate. If you have any questions about the KB setup on a 5.0L ask away. I know quite a bit about getting the most from these kits. I have run mine all the way up to 16 psi of boost. |

#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
BradandBrooks wrote: "Michael Johnson" <cds (AT) erols (DOT) com> wrote in message news:7fidnRIEgomUaTHYnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com... BradandBrooks wrote: "Gill" <gilles1nospam (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message news:Bd-dnd_6idcBuDHYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com... BradandBrooks wrote: "Bob A" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message news:45ab0f62$0$97248$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) yellow.readfreenews.net... "BradandBrooks" <BradandBrooks (AT) shaw (DOT) ca> wrote in message news:fxoqh.647439$1T2.227792 (AT) pd7urf2no (DOT) .. 1993 GT, stock, 5-spd, 2.73s, cat-back, timing bump. Going this route and got it narrowed down to two: Vortech V-2 SQ S-Trim or Paxton NOVI 2000 Thanks. Brad checkout Keene Bell too, you get full boost at about 1,700 RPM, the others have to spin up and get to full boost about 4,000 RPM when the engine is wound up Big difference in driving, lots of tourqe at low end with the KB, I have one on my 5.0 1993 LX ex cop car driving since about 97, no problems Well, I like the Novi too, but doesn't the Keene Bell make it hard to hook-up? Brad Hook-up, as in like launching off the line? There's of chassis and drive train work to do yet. Also, doesn't you motor have hypereutectic pistons? They tend to break easily under detonation. A good tune will keep you out of that. To get traction... the low rpm power seems like it would just break the tires loose constantly. I have a Kenne Bell on my 89 LX. The throttle response is fantastic with a twin screw blower and very controllable. It is no different than running a high revving big block engine. Okay.... never ridden in one of those before. I am going to look into it. Thanks. With a Kenne Bell your car will drive the same as it does now except your torque curve will raise 100-150 ft-lbs across the entire rpm range. I like them because they deliver a substantial performance gain at all rpm levels and not just above 4500-5000 rpm like a centrifugal. The reason for this is that a twin screw blower will make its full rated boost amount from rpm to redline whereas the boost made by a centrifugal is dependent on the rpm rate. If you have any questions about the KB setup on a 5.0L ask away. I know quite a bit about getting the most from these kits. I have run mine all the way up to 16 psi of boost. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
Are you the Michael Johnson who was/is looking for his father in Bowling Green, Kentucky??? Charles M. Johnson III???? This man is my father-in-law. Please email me at sweetkygirl784 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com. Michael Johnson wrote: BradandBrooks wrote: "Michael Johnson" <cds (AT) erols (DOT) com> wrote in message news:7fidnRIEgomUaTHYnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d (AT) giganews (DOT) com... BradandBrooks wrote: "Gill" <gilles1nospam (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote in message news:Bd-dnd_6idcBuDHYnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com... BradandBrooks wrote: "Bob A" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote in message news:45ab0f62$0$97248$892e7fe2 (AT) authen (DOT) yellow.readfreenews.net... "BradandBrooks" <BradandBrooks (AT) shaw (DOT) ca> wrote in message news:fxoqh.647439$1T2.227792 (AT) pd7urf2no (DOT) .. 1993 GT, stock, 5-spd, 2.73s, cat-back, timing bump. Going this route and got it narrowed down to two: Vortech V-2 SQ S-Trim or Paxton NOVI 2000 Thanks. Brad checkout Keene Bell too, you get full boost at about 1,700 RPM, the others have to spin up and get to full boost about 4,000 RPM when the engine is wound up Big difference in driving, lots of tourqe at low end with the KB, I have one on my 5.0 1993 LX ex cop car driving since about 97, no problems Well, I like the Novi too, but doesn't the Keene Bell make it hard to hook-up? Brad Hook-up, as in like launching off the line? There's of chassis and drive train work to do yet. Also, doesn't you motor have hypereutectic pistons? They tend to break easily under detonation. A good tune will keep you out of that. To get traction... the low rpm power seems like it would just break the tires loose constantly. I have a Kenne Bell on my 89 LX. The throttle response is fantastic with a twin screw blower and very controllable. It is no different than running a high revving big block engine. Okay.... never ridden in one of those before. I am going to look into it. Thanks. With a Kenne Bell your car will drive the same as it does now except your torque curve will raise 100-150 ft-lbs across the entire rpm range. I like them because they deliver a substantial performance gain at all rpm levels and not just above 4500-5000 rpm like a centrifugal. The reason for this is that a twin screw blower will make its full rated boost amount from rpm to redline whereas the boost made by a centrifugal is dependent on the rpm rate. If you have any questions about the KB setup on a 5.0L ask away. I know quite a bit about getting the most from these kits. I have run mine all the way up to 16 psi of boost. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
On the odd chance this is a legitimate post, I'm not the person you are looking for. My father died many years ago and his name wasn't Charles. Sorry. sweetkygirl784 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: Are you the Michael Johnson who was/is looking for his father in Bowling Green, Kentucky??? Charles M. Johnson III???? This man is my father-in-law. Please email me at sweetkygirl784 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
Michael Johnson wrote: On the odd chance this is a legitimate post, I'm not the person you are looking for. My father died many years ago and his name wasn't Charles. Sorry. sweetkygirl784 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: Are you the Michael Johnson who was/is looking for his father in Bowling Green, Kentucky??? Charles M. Johnson III???? This man is my father-in-law. Please email me at sweetkygirl784 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com. Dude, your long lost ex-wife??? LOL! |

#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
WindsorFox wrote: Michael Johnson wrote: On the odd chance this is a legitimate post, I'm not the person you are looking for. My father died many years ago and his name wasn't Charles. Sorry. sweetkygirl... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: Are you the Michael Johnson who was/is looking for his father in Bowling Green, Kentucky??? Charles M. Johnson III???? This man is my father-in-law. Please email me at sweetkygirl... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com. Dude, your long lost ex-wife??? LOL!How may people with the name of "Michael Johnson" exist in this world? More than I few I would guess. The odds of me being THE Michael Johnson she is looking for is beyond remote. Although, meeting a 22 year old sweet KY girl may not be a bad thing, if my wife doesn't care. ![]() |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
WindsorFox wrote: Michael Johnson wrote: On the odd chance this is a legitimate post, I'm not the person you are looking for. My father died many years ago and his name wasn't Charles. Sorry. sweetkygirl784 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: Are you the Michael Johnson who was/is looking for his father in Bowling Green, Kentucky??? Charles M. Johnson III???? This man is my father-in-law. Please email me at sweetkygirl784 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com. Dude, your long lost ex-wife??? LOL! How may people with the name of "Michael Johnson" exist in this world? More than I few I would guess. The odds of me being THE Michael Johnson she is looking for is beyond remote. Although, meeting a 22 year old sweet KY girl may not be a bad thing, if my wife doesn't care. ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |