![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
You research something. That was your choice. Nobody held a gun to your head. Just because someone does or doesn't read your research, and does or doesn't accept it as the final authority, shouldn't upset you so. |
|
Al Gore provides people with all kinds of research to back up his position on global warming, and he does the same thing you do when someone doesn't agree with his research. I recall when he was saying the same things about the coming ice age and it's causes. Why should I, or anyone else, put more store in his position simply because he does the research? |
|
You mean the same way you insult anyone who doesn't simply swallow your views without question? |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <teqs43hnsu4r11joa19029ofuig6pfppm4 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, Spike wrote: You research something. That was your choice. Nobody held a gun to your head. Just because someone does or doesn't read your research, and does or doesn't accept it as the final authority, shouldn't upset you so. You didn't debate its merits. you simply chose to insult me instead. Al Gore provides people with all kinds of research to back up his position on global warming, and he does the same thing you do when someone doesn't agree with his research. I recall when he was saying the same things about the coming ice age and it's causes. Why should I, or anyone else, put more store in his position simply because he does the research? If you were presenting Al Gore's points, I would present counter points not insult you. You mean the same way you insult anyone who doesn't simply swallow your views without question? I made no such demand. Your response was to insult me personally instead of come up with something else. You don't get it, you won't get it. Most of the people in this group behave well like children. A reasoned argument with supporting documentation is given and you call names. Even worse, you don't understand how saying I'm 'Rosie' isn't a counter point. Forget it. Pointless. rest snipped, unread You see? You just insulted "most of the people in this group....". You |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
While I don't disagree with your hypothesis, the average American can't drive worth a shit to begin with. Therefore, we are all held to the LCD standard. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
What shortage? Is there rationing? Are there lines at the pumps? Not where I live. |
|
And someone explain to me the strategy of shutting down "two of our largest oil refineries" for "routine maintenance" just before Memorial Day, a time when gasoline demand can reliably be expected to increase. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
Dammit, what the fuck is wrong with you? In economics it's known as supply & demand. In anal sex, its known as put it in slowly. I would like to know what gas prices should be using any year you want and adjusting it forward for inflation just like many other products. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:40:41 -0500, tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Brent P) wrote something wonderfully witty: In article <tubs43dka67g810qdt32hlkb15n7g8enc7 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, Spike wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:44:48 -0500, tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Brent P) wrote: SNIP Yes, they have underposted speed limits for revenue collection too. And people burn speed cameras over there. And when one looks into their road safety because of said speed cameras, it's at best no improvement and sometimes more dangerous. But if you had researched the topic you would already know it and wouldn't be trying to recycle back to that to cover your ass here. While I don't disagree with your hypothesis, the average American can't drive worth a shit to begin with. Therefore, we are all held to the LCD standard. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sat, 19 May 2007 04:22:35 -0400, The Wolf With the Red Roses Wolf (AT) Red (DOT) com> wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:40:41 -0500, tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Brent P) wrote something wonderfully witty: In article <tubs43dka67g810qdt32hlkb15n7g8enc7 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, Spike wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:44:48 -0500, tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Brent P) wrote: SNIP Yes, they have underposted speed limits for revenue collection too. And people burn speed cameras over there. And when one looks into their road safety because of said speed cameras, it's at best no improvement and sometimes more dangerous. But if you had researched the topic you would already know it and wouldn't be trying to recycle back to that to cover your ass here. While I don't disagree with your hypothesis, the average American can't drive worth a shit to begin with. Therefore, we are all held to the LCD standard. Actually, when you take into account the numbers of drivers, the conditions of the roads, etc, US drivers are not that bad compared to many other countries I have driven in. If you notice the drivers where you live and compare their driving to drivers who visit your particular locale, I would say that the "foreign" drivers are far worse. The local drivers have adopted their style in order to survive. The "foreign" drivers have not yet learned those survival techniques. A zillion cars flow into and out of the major metro areas like LA, SF, NY, etc, every day and survive the trip because the have learned the skills to survive. If that requires a driver to be rude, or act in other ways to survive, that's what they do. The person lacking those skills is the one most apt to initiate a chain reaction because they are trying to use the survival skills of their home territory. This is something man has used since long before the car. Environmental adaptation. For example, the colonists who adopted buckskin and blended into the woodlands the way the Indians did not only kept their scalps, but whipped the hell out of the British who wore red and marched in a straight line. The Brits failed to adopt the survival skills in the new environment. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sat, 19 May 2007 09:34:16 -0400, "dwight" <tfrog93 (AT) gEEmail (DOT) com wrote something wonderfully witty: "The Wolf With the Red Roses" <Wolf (AT) Red (DOT) com> wrote in message news:3bbt43d7i5ur2jbgu11rrupo849nrmjngg (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... While I don't disagree with your hypothesis, the average American can't drive worth a shit to begin with. Therefore, we are all held to the LCD standard. I do disagree with your hypothesis. I'm the average American, and I think I drive fairly well. In fact, AS the average American, I drive better than 95% of the drivers out there. Where do you fall on the curve? dwight I can see that you are also a product of our educational system. If you are better then 95% of the drivers out there -- how on earth can you be average? |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
Spike wrote: On Sat, 19 May 2007 04:22:35 -0400, The Wolf With the Red Roses Wolf (AT) Red (DOT) com> wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:40:41 -0500, tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Brent P) wrote something wonderfully witty: In article <tubs43dka67g810qdt32hlkb15n7g8enc7 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, Spike wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:44:48 -0500, tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Brent P) wrote: SNIP Yes, they have underposted speed limits for revenue collection too. And people burn speed cameras over there. And when one looks into their road safety because of said speed cameras, it's at best no improvement and sometimes more dangerous. But if you had researched the topic you would already know it and wouldn't be trying to recycle back to that to cover your ass here. While I don't disagree with your hypothesis, the average American can't drive worth a shit to begin with. Therefore, we are all held to the LCD standard. Actually, when you take into account the numbers of drivers, the conditions of the roads, etc, US drivers are not that bad compared to many other countries I have driven in. If you notice the drivers where you live and compare their driving to drivers who visit your particular locale, I would say that the "foreign" drivers are far worse. The local drivers have adopted their style in order to survive. The "foreign" drivers have not yet learned those survival techniques. A zillion cars flow into and out of the major metro areas like LA, SF, NY, etc, every day and survive the trip because the have learned the skills to survive. If that requires a driver to be rude, or act in other ways to survive, that's what they do. The person lacking those skills is the one most apt to initiate a chain reaction because they are trying to use the survival skills of their home territory. This is something man has used since long before the car. Environmental adaptation. For example, the colonists who adopted buckskin and blended into the woodlands the way the Indians did not only kept their scalps, but whipped the hell out of the British who wore red and marched in a straight line. The Brits failed to adopt the survival skills in the new environment. Reminds me of one of my favorite all time movies, "The Patriot". |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sat, 19 May 2007 16:40:21 -0400, Michael Johnson <cds (AT) erols (DOT) com wrote: Spike wrote: On Sat, 19 May 2007 04:22:35 -0400, The Wolf With the Red Roses Wolf (AT) Red (DOT) com> wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:40:41 -0500, tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Brent P) wrote something wonderfully witty: In article <tubs43dka67g810qdt32hlkb15n7g8enc7 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, Spike wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:44:48 -0500, tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Brent P) wrote: SNIP Yes, they have underposted speed limits for revenue collection too. And people burn speed cameras over there. And when one looks into their road safety because of said speed cameras, it's at best no improvement and sometimes more dangerous. But if you had researched the topic you would already know it and wouldn't be trying to recycle back to that to cover your ass here. While I don't disagree with your hypothesis, the average American can't drive worth a shit to begin with. Therefore, we are all held to the LCD standard. Actually, when you take into account the numbers of drivers, the conditions of the roads, etc, US drivers are not that bad compared to many other countries I have driven in. If you notice the drivers where you live and compare their driving to drivers who visit your particular locale, I would say that the "foreign" drivers are far worse. The local drivers have adopted their style in order to survive. The "foreign" drivers have not yet learned those survival techniques. A zillion cars flow into and out of the major metro areas like LA, SF, NY, etc, every day and survive the trip because the have learned the skills to survive. If that requires a driver to be rude, or act in other ways to survive, that's what they do. The person lacking those skills is the one most apt to initiate a chain reaction because they are trying to use the survival skills of their home territory. This is something man has used since long before the car. Environmental adaptation. For example, the colonists who adopted buckskin and blended into the woodlands the way the Indians did not only kept their scalps, but whipped the hell out of the British who wore red and marched in a straight line. The Brits failed to adopt the survival skills in the new environment. Reminds me of one of my favorite all time movies, "The Patriot". Mine, too. Or how about "Last of the Mohicans" when the Indians lined the roadway and the Brits walked right into the killing zone and never saw it coming? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |