![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
| "Wade" <nugr**v*@excite.com> wrote in message news:YIqdnaG7s-5JIqHbnZ2dnUVZ_oKnnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com... Let's see if I can remember them all Jeep Cherokee - The worst. This thing was in the shop ever few months. brake, transmission and axel problems. She went over some train tracks once, not hard mind you and the steering wheel became off center. The steering wheel always look like she was turning left even when she was driving straight. This happened twice. Ford Escape - great for the first 35K, then got noisy and the transmission started slipping. Dodge Grand Caravan - was okay Ford Windstar knobs and parts started falling off within the first few thousand miles. We only had this car for about 20K, she then changed jobs. Pontiac Grand Prix was okay, then developed a a clicking in the steering wheel. The steering wasn't smooth, you could feel while turning. Chevrolet Equinox- only had this one for 8K, job change again. Was fairly nice vehicle. Ride was way too soft though, felt like we were floating. Likewise, you're going to find people who have had excellent service from these vehicles and others who didn't. Likewise for the Toyotas and Hondas. Jeff Also, company cars get the snot beat out of them. They never last. My last company car, a Taurus, had to be traded in at 220,000 mi. ("it might start getting unreliable" they said). My current company car, another Taurus, is at 189,00 mi. now, & they'll probably make me turn in that one too at ~220,000 mi. next year. Bastards. They should buy some quality vehicles that last next time. Rob |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Obviously our friend Wade is a Honda owner and blowing smoke. He has no idea what he is talking about when it comes to the longevity of today's vehicles. Most corporations give their vehicles, like most of the other "tools" used in their business, the best of maintenance. Down time costs big money. Because of federal depreciation tax laws, corporations generally keep their vehicles in service for five year or 300K WOF. I might add from my years in the fleet service business I can tell you, with the exception of the 'courier' companies that buy a lot of Korean cars, few corporations by foreign cars because they are less cost effective over the time they must be kept in service. mike |
|
"trainfan1" <lmsearing (AT) usdatanet (DOT) net> wrote in message news:LNSdnW14qqtrWKHbnZ2dnUVZ_ternZ2d (AT) usadatanet (DOT) net... "Wade" <nugr**v*@excite.com> wrote in message news:YIqdnaG7s-5JIqHbnZ2dnUVZ_oKnnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com... Let's see if I can remember them all Jeep Cherokee - The worst. This thing was in the shop ever few months. brake, transmission and axel problems. She went over some train tracks once, not hard mind you and the steering wheel became off center. The steering wheel always look like she was turning left even when she was driving straight. This happened twice. Ford Escape - great for the first 35K, then got noisy and the transmission started slipping. Dodge Grand Caravan - was okay Ford Windstar knobs and parts started falling off within the first few thousand miles. We only had this car for about 20K, she then changed jobs. Pontiac Grand Prix was okay, then developed a a clicking in the steering wheel. The steering wasn't smooth, you could feel while turning. Chevrolet Equinox- only had this one for 8K, job change again. Was fairly nice vehicle. Ride was way too soft though, felt like we were floating. Likewise, you're going to find people who have had excellent service from these vehicles and others who didn't. Likewise for the Toyotas and Hondas. Jeff Also, company cars get the snot beat out of them. They never last. My last company car, a Taurus, had to be traded in at 220,000 mi. ("it might start getting unreliable" they said). My current company car, another Taurus, is at 189,00 mi. now, & they'll probably make me turn in that one too at ~220,000 mi. next year. Bastards. They should buy some quality vehicles that last next time. Rob |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote in message news:kPqdnRIvmI-0uKDbnZ2dnUVZ_qSrnZ2d (AT) ptd (DOT) net... Obviously our friend Wade is a Honda owner and blowing smoke. He has no idea what he is talking about when it comes to the longevity of today's vehicles. Most corporations give their vehicles, like most of the other "tools" used in their business, the best of maintenance. Down time costs big money. Because of federal depreciation tax laws, corporations generally keep their vehicles in service for five year or 300K WOF. I might add from my years in the fleet service business I can tell you, with the exception of the 'courier' companies that buy a lot of Korean cars, few corporations by foreign cars because they are less cost effective over the time they must be kept in service. mike And partly this is because Honda won't sell any cars to fleets and Toyota caps its fleet sales at 9%. This makes them more expensive for fleets to purchase and own. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hog wash, you are confused. The 'courier' fleets avoid the midget cars but they buy Focus, Civics, Corollas, Neons, VWs, Cavaliers as well as Korean cars. Account executives from every import manufacturer are all over our corporate fleet buyers, looking to sell vehicles to them. As to the fleet discount, it is pretty much the same amount for all manufactures domestic and import, around $800 on average, for fleets as low as five vehicles. The reason fleet buyer prefer domestics is the overall lower overall cost of ownership over five years. Fleets look at the cost of the all the 'tools' used in their business. Vehicles are just one more tool to them. Import part prices and their availability are one of the major problems. Waiting for parts equals longer down time. Initial purchase prices, that average 20% higher, for similar size an similarly equipped vehicles, and the fact imports do not generally build vehicles specifically equipped for fleets. Fleets maintain meticulous records that prove, on average, imports are no better or worse than domestics in the cost of repairs required, as many in import NGs would have one believe. Look around and see what brand dominates the corporate fleet market. Ford has the largest percentage of fleet buyers because Ford vehicles are the most cost effect in terms of acquiring, insuring, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the vehicles, period mike |
|
"dh" <dh (AT) stargate (DOT) com> wrote in message news:463dfeef$0$16270$88260bb3 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com... "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote in message news:kPqdnRIvmI-0uKDbnZ2dnUVZ_qSrnZ2d (AT) ptd (DOT) net... Obviously our friend Wade is a Honda owner and blowing smoke. He has no idea what he is talking about when it comes to the longevity of today's vehicles. Most corporations give their vehicles, like most of the other "tools" used in their business, the best of maintenance. Down time costs big money. Because of federal depreciation tax laws, corporations generally keep their vehicles in service for five year or 300K WOF. I might add from my years in the fleet service business I can tell you, with the exception of the 'courier' companies that buy a lot of Korean cars, few corporations by foreign cars because they are less cost effective over the time they must be kept in service. mike And partly this is because Honda won't sell any cars to fleets and Toyota caps its fleet sales at 9%. This makes them more expensive for fleets to purchase and own. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote in message news:ebSdndH5IP5ry6LbnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d (AT) ptd (DOT) net... Hog wash, you are confused. The 'courier' fleets avoid the midget cars but they buy Focus, Civics, Corollas, Neons, VWs, Cavaliers as well as Korean cars. Account executives from every import manufacturer are all over our corporate fleet buyers, looking to sell vehicles to them. As to the fleet discount, it is pretty much the same amount for all manufactures domestic and import, around $800 on average, for fleets as low as five vehicles. The reason fleet buyer prefer domestics is the overall lower overall cost of ownership over five years. Fleets look at the cost of the all the 'tools' used in their business. Vehicles are just one more tool to them. Import part prices and their availability are one of the major problems. Waiting for parts equals longer down time. Initial purchase prices, that average 20% higher, for similar size an similarly equipped vehicles, and the fact imports do not generally build vehicles specifically equipped for fleets. Fleets maintain meticulous records that prove, on average, imports are no better or worse than domestics in the cost of repairs required, as many in import NGs would have one believe. Look around and see what brand dominates the corporate fleet market. Ford has the largest percentage of fleet buyers because Ford vehicles are the most cost effect in terms of acquiring, insuring, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the vehicles, period mike A) How long have you been retired? You're really out of touch. Import part prices and availability aren't a problem since I-don't-know-when. B) Which of these "fleets" publish these records? C) Honda and Toyota aren't taking a $800 hit if they don't need to. With 45-day inventories, they don't need to. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Import brands are offering much higher rebates, than $800 on retail sales, but you are free to believe whatever you choose. The current fleet discount on the Ridgeline, so called "truck," is $1,500 ![]() mike |
|
"DH" <dh (AT) stargate (DOT) com> wrote in message news:463f58d1$0$16370$88260bb3 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com... "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote in message news:ebSdndH5IP5ry6LbnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d (AT) ptd (DOT) net... Hog wash, you are confused. The 'courier' fleets avoid the midget cars but they buy Focus, Civics, Corollas, Neons, VWs, Cavaliers as well as Korean cars. Account executives from every import manufacturer are all over our corporate fleet buyers, looking to sell vehicles to them. As to the fleet discount, it is pretty much the same amount for all manufactures domestic and import, around $800 on average, for fleets as low as five vehicles. The reason fleet buyer prefer domestics is the overall lower overall cost of ownership over five years. Fleets look at the cost of the all the 'tools' used in their business. Vehicles are just one more tool to them. Import part prices and their availability are one of the major problems. Waiting for parts equals longer down time. Initial purchase prices, that average 20% higher, for similar size an similarly equipped vehicles, and the fact imports do not generally build vehicles specifically equipped for fleets. Fleets maintain meticulous records that prove, on average, imports are no better or worse than domestics in the cost of repairs required, as many in import NGs would have one believe. Look around and see what brand dominates the corporate fleet market. Ford has the largest percentage of fleet buyers because Ford vehicles are the most cost effect in terms of acquiring, insuring, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the vehicles, period mike A) How long have you been retired? You're really out of touch. Import part prices and availability aren't a problem since I-don't-know-when. B) Which of these "fleets" publish these records? C) Honda and Toyota aren't taking a $800 hit if they don't need to. With 45-day inventories, they don't need to. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote in message news:8uOdne9T0ZQ18aLbnZ2dnUVZ_ualnZ2d (AT) ptd (DOT) net... Import brands are offering much higher rebates, than $800 on retail sales, but you are free to believe whatever you choose. The current fleet discount on the Ridgeline, so called "truck," is $1,500 ![]() mike I notice you ducked the questions. "DH" <dh (AT) stargate (DOT) com> wrote in message news:463f58d1$0$16370$88260bb3 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com... "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote in message news:ebSdndH5IP5ry6LbnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d (AT) ptd (DOT) net... Hog wash, you are confused. The 'courier' fleets avoid the midget cars but they buy Focus, Civics, Corollas, Neons, VWs, Cavaliers as well as Korean cars. Account executives from every import manufacturer are all over our corporate fleet buyers, looking to sell vehicles to them. As to the fleet discount, it is pretty much the same amount for all manufactures domestic and import, around $800 on average, for fleets as low as five vehicles. The reason fleet buyer prefer domestics is the overall lower overall cost of ownership over five years. Fleets look at the cost of the all the 'tools' used in their business. Vehicles are just one more tool to them. Import part prices and their availability are one of the major problems. Waiting for parts equals longer down time. Initial purchase prices, that average 20% higher, for similar size an similarly equipped vehicles, and the fact imports do not generally build vehicles specifically equipped for fleets. Fleets maintain meticulous records that prove, on average, imports are no better or worse than domestics in the cost of repairs required, as many in import NGs would have one believe. Look around and see what brand dominates the corporate fleet market. Ford has the largest percentage of fleet buyers because Ford vehicles are the most cost effect in terms of acquiring, insuring, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the vehicles, period mike A) How long have you been retired? You're really out of touch. Import part prices and availability aren't a problem since I-don't-know-when. B) Which of these "fleets" publish these records? C) Honda and Toyota aren't taking a $800 hit if they don't need to. With 45-day inventories, they don't need to. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
You mean the stupid questions? Two years, and why would anybody expect a corporation to publish it private operating cost figures? LOL mike |
|
"DH" <dh (AT) stargate (DOT) com> wrote in message news:463f7514$0$16379$88260bb3 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com... "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote in message news:8uOdne9T0ZQ18aLbnZ2dnUVZ_ualnZ2d (AT) ptd (DOT) net... Import brands are offering much higher rebates, than $800 on retail sales, but you are free to believe whatever you choose. The current fleet discount on the Ridgeline, so called "truck," is $1,500 ![]() mike I notice you ducked the questions. "DH" <dh (AT) stargate (DOT) com> wrote in message news:463f58d1$0$16370$88260bb3 (AT) free (DOT) teranews.com... "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote in message news:ebSdndH5IP5ry6LbnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d (AT) ptd (DOT) net... Hog wash, you are confused. The 'courier' fleets avoid the midget cars but they buy Focus, Civics, Corollas, Neons, VWs, Cavaliers as well as Korean cars. Account executives from every import manufacturer are all over our corporate fleet buyers, looking to sell vehicles to them. As to the fleet discount, it is pretty much the same amount for all manufactures domestic and import, around $800 on average, for fleets as low as five vehicles. The reason fleet buyer prefer domestics is the overall lower overall cost of ownership over five years. Fleets look at the cost of the all the 'tools' used in their business. Vehicles are just one more tool to them. Import part prices and their availability are one of the major problems. Waiting for parts equals longer down time. Initial purchase prices, that average 20% higher, for similar size an similarly equipped vehicles, and the fact imports do not generally build vehicles specifically equipped for fleets. Fleets maintain meticulous records that prove, on average, imports are no better or worse than domestics in the cost of repairs required, as many in import NGs would have one believe. Look around and see what brand dominates the corporate fleet market. Ford has the largest percentage of fleet buyers because Ford vehicles are the most cost effect in terms of acquiring, insuring, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the vehicles, period mike A) How long have you been retired? You're really out of touch. Import part prices and availability aren't a problem since I-don't-know-when. B) Which of these "fleets" publish these records? C) Honda and Toyota aren't taking a $800 hit if they don't need to. With 45-day inventories, they don't need to. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 (AT) mailcity (DOT) com> wrote in message news:buSdnfD1Y9oXHqLbnZ2dnUVZ_umlnZ2d (AT) ptd (DOT) net... You mean the stupid questions? Two years, and why would anybody expect a corporation to publish it private operating cost figures? LOL mike In other words, you can't support your claims. That's what I expected. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
In other words, you can't support your claims. That's what I expected. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |