AutosTalk Forums  

Re: Is this really true?

Ford Vehicles Discussions About Ford Cars (alt.autos.ford)


Discuss Re: Is this really true? in the Ford Vehicles forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Scott
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Is this really true? - 04-24-2006 , 01:11 AM







"I. Care" <icare (AT) whocares (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Making the rounds via e-mail



A Japanese company (Toyota) and an American company (General Motors)
decided to have a canoe race on the Missouri River. Both teams practiced
long and hard to reach their peak performance before the race.

On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile.

The Americans, very discouraged and depressed, decided to investigate
the reason for the crushing defeat. A management team made up of senior
management was formed to investigate and recommend appropriate action.
Their conclusion was the Japanese had 8 people rowing and 1 person
steering, while the American team had 8 people steering and 1 person
rowing. So American management hired a consulting company and paid them
a large amount of money for a second opinion.

They advised that too many people were steering the boat, while not
enough people were rowing. To prevent another loss to the Japanese, the
rowing team's management structure was totally reorganized to 4 steering
supervisors, 3 area steering superintendents and 1 assistant
superintendent steering manager.

They also implemented a new performance system that would give the 1
person rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder. It was called
the "Rowing Team Quality First Program", with meetings, dinners and free
pens for the rower. There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes
and other equipment, extra vacation days for practices and bonuses.

The next year the Japanese won by two miles.

Humiliated, the American management laid off the rower for poor
performance, halted development of a new canoe, sold the paddles, and
canceled all capital investments for new equipment. The money saved was
distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses and the next year's
racing team was out-sourced to India.

The End.
I don't know if this is how GM works but it is exactly
how our government bureaucracy works. And I am
not joking.




Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Mike Hunter
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Is this really true? - 04-24-2006 , 10:05 AM






After all that, GM is still beating Toyota


mike hunt


"Scott" <homealone.com> wrote

Quote:
"I. Care" <icare (AT) whocares (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1eb5d9b5e4ee3efc9897d4 (AT) newsgroups (DOT) comcast.net...
Making the rounds via e-mail



A Japanese company (Toyota) and an American company (General Motors)
decided to have a canoe race on the Missouri River. Both teams practiced
long and hard to reach their peak performance before the race.

On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile.

The Americans, very discouraged and depressed, decided to investigate
the reason for the crushing defeat. A management team made up of senior
management was formed to investigate and recommend appropriate action.
Their conclusion was the Japanese had 8 people rowing and 1 person
steering, while the American team had 8 people steering and 1 person
rowing. So American management hired a consulting company and paid them
a large amount of money for a second opinion.

They advised that too many people were steering the boat, while not
enough people were rowing. To prevent another loss to the Japanese, the
rowing team's management structure was totally reorganized to 4 steering
supervisors, 3 area steering superintendents and 1 assistant
superintendent steering manager.

They also implemented a new performance system that would give the 1
person rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder. It was called
the "Rowing Team Quality First Program", with meetings, dinners and free
pens for the rower. There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes
and other equipment, extra vacation days for practices and bonuses.

The next year the Japanese won by two miles.

Humiliated, the American management laid off the rower for poor
performance, halted development of a new canoe, sold the paddles, and
canceled all capital investments for new equipment. The money saved was
distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses and the next year's
racing team was out-sourced to India.

The End.

I don't know if this is how GM works but it is exactly
how our government bureaucracy works. And I am
not joking.





Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.