Massa to the rear of the field....Broke an engine ?

Did I hear that right ? Ferrari doesnt break engines !!

On 17 Mar 2007 19:54:09 -0700, "How about NO trouble at the start of
the race ? nope impossible" <fastpitstops (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote:

Did I hear that right ? Ferrari doesnt break engines !!

So much for Paris not getting preferential status.
--

"...Luigi follow only the Ferraris."

"How about NO trouble at the start of the race ? nope impossible"
<fastpitstops (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote

Did I hear that right ? Ferrari doesnt break engines !!

For that read: "I'm in 16th anyway with the fastest car on the track , might
as well have a new motor"

Luigi Topolino wrote:

On 17 Mar 2007 19:54:09 -0700, "How about NO trouble at the start of
the race ? nope impossible" <fastpitstops (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote:
Did I hear that right ? Ferrari doesnt break engines !!

So much for Paris not getting preferential status.

why dont you at least give it time, to where the ratio of
problems/broken engines will be similar to schumi/rubens...then your
statement will not sound so funny

"Iain Miller" <donot (AT) spam (DOT) me> wrote

"How about NO trouble at the start of the race ? nope impossible"
fastpitstops (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1174186449.579307.278810 (AT) y66g2000hsf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Did I hear that right ? Ferrari doesnt break engines !!


For that read: "I'm in 16th anyway with the fastest car on the track ,
might
as well have a new motor"

yeah the old one has soooo many miles on it.

"How about NO trouble at the start of the race ? nope impossible"
<fastpitstops (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote

Did I hear that right ? Ferrari doesnt break engines !!

Made up 16 spots, that wasn't bad.

"Ray O'Hara" <roh (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote

"Iain Miller" <donot (AT) spam (DOT) me> wrote in message
news:t32Lh.4410$Lz4.2342 (AT) newsfe7-gui (DOT) ntli.net...

"How about NO trouble at the start of the race ? nope impossible"
fastpitstops (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1174186449.579307.278810 (AT) y66g2000hsf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Did I hear that right ? Ferrari doesnt break engines !!


For that read: "I'm in 16th anyway with the fastest car on the track ,
might
as well have a new motor"



yeah the old one has soooo many miles on it.

If the transmission failed, it could have easily over stressed the motor.

Luigi Topolino wrote:

On 17 Mar 2007 19:54:09 -0700, "How about NO trouble at the start of
the race ? nope impossible" <fastpitstops (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote:
Did I hear that right ? Ferrari doesnt break engines !!

So much for Paris not getting preferential status.

ROFL. Whine, whine, whine. Time was, Ferrari made the most reliable car
on the grid. Don't tell me, it's because of Michael Schumacher's
excellent quality control skills.

--
Phil

http://www.usefilm.com/photographer/31307.html

How about NO trouble at the start of the race ? nope impossible wrote:

Did I hear that right ? Ferrari doesnt break engines !!

True.

Gearboxes, however...

--
Paul-B Formula 1 - cheat-free version here now.

On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 12:13:29 +0000, Phil Newnham <pnewnham (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
wrote:

Luigi Topolino wrote:
On 17 Mar 2007 19:54:09 -0700, "How about NO trouble at the start of
the race ? nope impossible" <fastpitstops (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote:
Did I hear that right ? Ferrari doesnt break engines !!

So much for Paris not getting preferential status.

ROFL. Whine, whine, whine. Time was, Ferrari made the most reliable car
on the grid. Don't tell me, it's because of Michael Schumacher's
excellent quality control skills.

Time was, if Rubens or Eddie caught a cold it was evidence of some
Machiavellian machination of the team and their "preferred" driver...

What's changed? Other than your affection for the "preferred" driver?


--

"...Luigi follow only the Ferraris."