![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
Apparently, it was 75% full - lots of empty seats. Well organised - but only if you had a car parking pass. Otherwise, it was a series of bus journeys starting 5km away to get to the circuit. We are not sure that there was alcohol on sale to people not in a hospitality area. They key question I asked was "would you go again?". The answer so far has been no??? |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
For those thinking of going next year, here are the views my Brother has heard voiced by various friends who were there: Apparently, it was 75% full - lots of empty seats. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:12:33 +0000 (UTC), Mark s... (AT) not (DOT) welcome.here.ac.uk> wrote: For those thinking of going next year, here are the views my Brother has heard voiced by various friends who were there: Apparently, it was 75% full - lots of empty seats. According to the BBC it was a sellout |

|
hyperbole seemed to be spouted on the Beeb last weekend. -- Henry Birkin Bt. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:12:33 +0000 (UTC), Mark spam (AT) not (DOT) welcome.here.ac.uk> wrote: For those thinking of going next year, here are the views my Brother has heard voiced by various friends who were there: Apparently, it was 75% full - lots of empty seats. According to the BBC it was a sellout - but then quite a lot of hyperbole seemed to be spouted on the Beeb last weekend. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Sir Tim wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:12:33 +0000 (UTC), Mark spam (AT) not (DOT) welcome.here.ac.uk> wrote: For those thinking of going next year, here are the views my Brother has heard voiced by various friends who were there: Apparently, it was 75% full - lots of empty seats. According to the BBC it was a sellout - but then quite a lot of hyperbole seemed to be spouted on the Beeb last weekend. Much of the gushing was more like the Travel Show than sports coverage. But then, even the Archers has lately appeared to be sponsored by AGA Rangemaster Group PLC, flouting editorial guidelines. (See p. 119 "We must not linger on brand names or logos and use verbal references sparingly...") |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <N76dnQy_gOMdUHPXnZ2dnUVZ8uednZ2d (AT) pipex (DOT) net>, nospam (AT) f2s (DOT) com says... Sir Tim wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:12:33 +0000 (UTC), Mark spam (AT) not (DOT) welcome.here.ac.uk> wrote: For those thinking of going next year, here are the views my Brother has heard voiced by various friends who were there: Apparently, it was 75% full - lots of empty seats. According to the BBC it was a sellout - but then quite a lot of hyperbole seemed to be spouted on the Beeb last weekend. Much of the gushing was more like the Travel Show than sports coverage. But then, even the Archers has lately appeared to be sponsored by AGA Rangemaster Group PLC, flouting editorial guidelines. (See p. 119 "We must not linger on brand names or logos and use verbal references sparingly...") To be fair Chris, AGA has become a generic term for that kind of cooking range.. Irrespective of who actually made it ! |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tony Gartshore wrote: In article <N76dnQy_gOMdUHPXnZ2dnUVZ8uednZ2d (AT) pipex (DOT) net>, nospam (AT) f2s (DOT) com says... Sir Tim wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:12:33 +0000 (UTC), Mark spam (AT) not (DOT) welcome.here.ac.uk> wrote: For those thinking of going next year, here are the views my Brother has heard voiced by various friends who were there: Apparently, it was 75% full - lots of empty seats. According to the BBC it was a sellout - but then quite a lot of hyperbole seemed to be spouted on the Beeb last weekend. Much of the gushing was more like the Travel Show than sports coverage. But then, even the Archers has lately appeared to be sponsored by AGA Rangemaster Group PLC, flouting editorial guidelines. (See p. 119 "We must not linger on brand names or logos and use verbal references sparingly...") To be fair Chris, AGA has become a generic term for that kind of cooking range.. Irrespective of who actually made it ! True, but the little (little? 199 pages?) red book still doesn't allow it. To use a brand name once is fine, but it was mentioned at least four times over two episodes. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <-pWdnQ6kbPNbqHLXnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d (AT) pipex (DOT) net>, nospam (AT) f2s (DOT) com says... Tony Gartshore wrote: In article <N76dnQy_gOMdUHPXnZ2dnUVZ8uednZ2d (AT) pipex (DOT) net>, nospam (AT) f2s (DOT) com says... Sir Tim wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:12:33 +0000 (UTC), Mark spam (AT) not (DOT) welcome.here.ac.uk> wrote: For those thinking of going next year, here are the views my Brother has heard voiced by various friends who were there: Apparently, it was 75% full - lots of empty seats. According to the BBC it was a sellout - but then quite a lot of hyperbole seemed to be spouted on the Beeb last weekend. Much of the gushing was more like the Travel Show than sports coverage. But then, even the Archers has lately appeared to be sponsored by AGA Rangemaster Group PLC, flouting editorial guidelines. (See p. 119 "We must not linger on brand names or logos and use verbal references sparingly...") To be fair Chris, AGA has become a generic term for that kind of cooking range.. Irrespective of who actually made it ! True, but the little (little? 199 pages?) red book still doesn't allow it. To use a brand name once is fine, but it was mentioned at least four times over two episodes. " I'll just pop this chicken casserole in the generic, cast iron, six feet long , wood fired cooking range" Nah, can't see it catching on .. What is the name of the other outfit that make the things anyway ? |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <-pWdnQ6kbPNbqHLXnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d (AT) pipex (DOT) net>, nospam (AT) f2s (DOT) com says... Tony Gartshore wrote: In article <N76dnQy_gOMdUHPXnZ2dnUVZ8uednZ2d (AT) pipex (DOT) net>, nospam (AT) f2s (DOT) com says... Sir Tim wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:12:33 +0000 (UTC), Mark spam (AT) not (DOT) welcome.here.ac.uk> wrote: For those thinking of going next year, here are the views my Brother has heard voiced by various friends who were there: Apparently, it was 75% full - lots of empty seats. According to the BBC it was a sellout - but then quite a lot of hyperbole seemed to be spouted on the Beeb last weekend. Much of the gushing was more like the Travel Show than sports coverage. But then, even the Archers has lately appeared to be sponsored by AGA Rangemaster Group PLC, flouting editorial guidelines. (See p. 119 "We must not linger on brand names or logos and use verbal references sparingly...") To be fair Chris, AGA has become a generic term for that kind of cooking range.. Irrespective of who actually made it ! True, but the little (little? 199 pages?) red book still doesn't allow it. To use a brand name once is fine, but it was mentioned at least four times over two episodes. " I'll just pop this chicken casserole in the generic, cast iron, six feet long , wood fired cooking range" Nah, can't see it catching on .. What is the name of the other outfit that make the things anyway ? |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <-pWdnQ6kbPNbqHLXnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d (AT) pipex (DOT) net>, nospam (AT) f2s (DOT) com says... Tony Gartshore wrote: In article <N76dnQy_gOMdUHPXnZ2dnUVZ8uednZ2d (AT) pipex (DOT) net>, nospam (AT) f2s (DOT) com says... Sir Tim wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:12:33 +0000 (UTC), Mark spam (AT) not (DOT) welcome.here.ac.uk> wrote: For those thinking of going next year, here are the views my Brother has >>>> heard voiced by various friends who were there: Apparently, it was 75% full - lots of empty seats. According to the BBC it was a sellout - but then quite a lot of hyperbole seemed to be spouted on the Beeb last weekend. Much of the gushing was more like the Travel Show than sports coverage. But then, even the Archers has lately appeared to be sponsored by AGA >> Rangemaster Group PLC, flouting editorial guidelines. (See p. 119 "We >> must not linger on brand names or logos and use verbal references >> sparingly...") To be fair Chris, AGA has become a generic term for that kind of cooking range.. Irrespective of who actually made it ! True, but the little (little? 199 pages?) red book still doesn't allow it. To use a brand name once is fine, but it was mentioned at least four times over two episodes. " I'll just pop this chicken casserole in the generic, cast iron, six feet long , wood fired cooking range" Nah, can't see it catching on .. What is the name of the other outfit that make the things anyway ? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |