Prefect_Being wrote:
Quote:
With the new Merc (V8) was about 4.5-5 seconds slower than the
quickest. Allowing for the driver, future developement and reliability
etc |
Also remember these are interim testbeds, mainly current cars with V8's
in the back. As the V8's are smaller, lighter, etc, the cars are
simply using spacers to try and keep the same wheelbase and suspension
geometry as the V10's. Despite that, the centre of gravity will have
changed quite drastically, as will the PMI. A chassis designed around
the V8's will make a substantial improvement in itself. Then add on 6
months of development and testing, and running the V8's to their race
potential (which is not happening yet), and the laptimes will fall from
+4.5s.
Throughout the mid-90's when Renault engines were winning
championships, they averaged a 19hp increase per season. The ballpark
figures for engines are a 10% hp increase will gain you 1.2s per lap.
I can't go into any more detail on that, like what circuit
characteristics etc, so don't ask.
Given a current V10 is approx 950hp, and we're looking somewhere in the
region of 750-775hp from the V8's in Australia next season, that's a
20% decrease or about +2.5-2.7s per lap. Of course the new chassis
designs (wheelbase, weight distribution, PMI etc) will have an effect,
as will any other rule changes regarding other technical aspects of F1.
Quote:
Looks like the cars will be less point-and-squirt, which is good. |
In the good ol' days, corner exit speed was everything, as it dictated
your speed all the way along the following straight. In current F1,
the power, TC and aero characteristics mean that the cars get up
towards Vmax so quickly that corner exits aren't as valuable as they
were. Now a good lap is more about being fast, late and stable under
braking and at turn-in. Hopefully, as you say, less power will
differentiate more between the drivers who rely on the electronics too
much and the drivers who understand and can control the car and carry
the highest apex speed through to the exit. This sort of thing will
play slightly into the hands of good left-foot brakers, such as Michael
or Button, although not as much as a ban on TC would.
Top speeds will be down, slipstreaming will decrease (lower speeds lead
to less of a slipstream, and less power means less acceleration once in
a tow), and braking distances will also decrease. Without any kind of
change in the aero department, it could well be that there is less
overtaking next season than there has been in 2005.
Quote:
Wouldn't be at all suprised to see the wheel-base a bit shorter, so the
cars could look pretty small, particularly with the shorter engine. |
A shorter wheelbase is better for slower corners, whereas a longer
wheelbase provides fast corner stability. A longer wheelbase is also
better for traction. There are complications with staying long though,
using spacers (or equivalents) means you lose control of the weight
distribution a bit, but the alternative is to extend the gearbox and
rear suspension which makes it trickier to design and control. The
general consensus seems to be 'as long as is convenient', but naturally
everybody is being very tight-lipped at the moment. I wouldn't be
surprised (simply going on recent history) if Renault use some kind of
spacer and go as long as they can.