John Doe II wrote:
Quote:
Monaco, Spa, and Monza, are there any other tracks left in F1 that any one
really cares about? |
Great tracks, don't forget Suzuka and Silverstone. The Becketts
complex at Silverstone, and the left-right-left-right section at the
start of the lap at Suzuka are probably fighting to be the trickiest
corners in F1 in terms of gaining/losing time by being inches out of
line having a knock-on effect through the entire section.
It seems to be a common trend that the final corner or part of the lap
must be ruined or completely out of character to the rest of the
circuit.
The final chicane at Suzuka is rubbish. There has to be something
there to stop the cars bombing down the front straight, and preferably
provide an overtaking opportunity, but there's a lot of space there and
the chicane they have is in exactly the wrong place, is way too tight,
is too close to 130R and fouls the pitlane entry. It changes on a
yearly basis too.
Silverstone is awesome, the cars don't even think of getting slow until
Club (over halfway around the lap). Bridge into Priory is great,
Brooklands is okay, but the Luffield hairpin is pointless. A slow,
washy, constant radius 200 degree corner. It was poor when it was two
distinct turns, but the thing they have now is dire. It's just
waiting... waiting... waiting... until the corner ends. F1 ain't
NASCAR...
Spa is the best circuit on the F1 calendar, each corner stands out.
All the way around the lap, fantastic, challenging corners all of
them... until the Bus Stop. If they let the cars come out of
Blanchimont and run to La Source, it would be a perfect end to the lap.
The only concern I can think is safety, but La Source is actually a
road junction and they could run the barriers half a mile up that
escape road if they wanted to.
Monza's slightly different, because it's the first chicane that sucks.
Like Suzuka, there has to be something there, and there's the space for
it, but what they have is just too tight and slow. Seeing F1 cars
crawling around the tight left hander is an affront to what F1 stands
for. The old version wasn't much better, but it did manage to cause
mistakes, like Hakkinen dropping it in 1998 and Hill spinning out in
1994(?), so there was something about it.
Even the hallowed ground of Monaco isn't left unchanged. La Rascasse
has been neutered, and every year barriers are moved further back from
apexes. It's change for change's sake, and it's taming the biggest
mental challenge in F1.
I don't actually mind the odd chicane, done properly. Variante Alta at
Imola is a perfect example. But for some reason it seems to be a rule
that every track must have some pointless, tight, painfully slow
chicane for some reason.