![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
Kimi will go where the money is, bottom line. I expect him to be at Fiat next year. If that happens I will hate him forever. Long live Alonso. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
CatharticF1 <eferrari (AT) heaven (DOT) net> wrote: Then where should he go - if not to the most successful team of the previous 10 years? Give or take the first four and the last two, of course... |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
Kimi will go where the money is, bottom line. I expect him to be at Fiat next year. If that happens I will hate him forever. Long live Alonso. What's the difference between Kimi going to Ferrari and Alonso going to McLaren? It seems that Kimi chose the better deal! |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:45:57 +0200, address (AT) in (DOT) sig (ric zito) wrote: CatharticF1 <eferrari (AT) heaven (DOT) net> wrote: Then where should he go - if not to the most successful team of the previous 10 years? Give or take the first four and the last two, of course... Last two? There's been a team more successful than Ferrari in the last 10 years? |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
Mark Jones <Mark (AT) Jones (DOT) co.nz> wrote: On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:45:57 +0200, address (AT) in (DOT) sig (ric zito) wrote: CatharticF1 <eferrari (AT) heaven (DOT) net> wrote: Then where should he go - if not to the most successful team of the previous 10 years? Give or take the first four and the last two, of course... Last two? There's been a team more successful than Ferrari in the last 10 years? No. But that wasn't my point. Saying "the last ten years" makes it sound bigger than it was. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
Then where should he go - if not to the most successful team of the previous 10 years? Give or take the first four and the last two, of course... Last two? There's been a team more successful than Ferrari in the last 10 years? No. But that wasn't my point. Saying "the last ten years" makes it sound bigger than it was. Well since MS joined the team in 1996, and was winning races for them in that year, ten years is an appropriate staring point. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
Mark Jones <Mark (AT) Jones (DOT) co.nz> wrote: Then where should he go - if not to the most successful team of the previous 10 years? Give or take the first four and the last two, of course... Last two? There's been a team more successful than Ferrari in the last 10 years? No. But that wasn't my point. Saying "the last ten years" makes it sound bigger than it was. Well since MS joined the team in 1996, and was winning races for them in that year, ten years is an appropriate staring point. Not at all. We were talking about the team. MS hasn't even entered the discussion thus far. The start or otherwise of his Ferrari tenure is irrelevant to the point I was making. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
Not at all. We were talking about the team. MS hasn't even entered the discussion thus far. The start or otherwise of his Ferrari tenure is irrelevant to the point I was making. Well then why stick to ten years at all? Why not 30 years, or 50? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |