AutosTalk Forums  

Dear Kimi

Formula 1 Formula 1 motor racing discusions (rec.autos.sport.f1)


Discuss Dear Kimi in the Formula 1 forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Your Pal... Sal
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Dear Kimi - 06-27-2006 , 12:11 PM






Quote:
Kimi will go where the money is, bottom line. I expect him to be at Fiat
next year.

If that happens I will hate him forever.
Long live Alonso.
What's the difference between Kimi going
to Ferrari and Alonso going to McLaren?

It seems that Kimi chose the better deal!

s/s




Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Mark Jones
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Dear Kimi - 06-27-2006 , 05:43 PM






On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:45:57 +0200, address (AT) in (DOT) sig (ric zito) wrote:
Quote:
CatharticF1 <eferrari (AT) heaven (DOT) net> wrote:
Then where should he go - if not to the most successful team of the
previous 10 years?

Give or take the first four and the last two, of course...
Last two? There's been a team more successful than Ferrari in the
last 10 years?


- Jones


Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
DD
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Dear Kimi - 06-28-2006 , 02:19 AM



In article <JJydnRpn_L6XxDzZUSdV9g (AT) ptd (DOT) net>, salscyn (AT) ptd (DOT) net says...
Quote:
Kimi will go where the money is, bottom line. I expect him to be at Fiat
next year.

If that happens I will hate him forever.
Long live Alonso.

What's the difference between Kimi going
to Ferrari and Alonso going to McLaren?

It seems that Kimi chose the better deal!
The better deal for Schumacher, yes. Not for Kimi.

--
Now with uploadable photo critique section in the forum
http://www.nikongear.com/


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
ric zito
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Dear Kimi - 06-28-2006 , 05:25 AM



Mark Jones <Mark (AT) Jones (DOT) co.nz> wrote:

Quote:
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:45:57 +0200, address (AT) in (DOT) sig (ric zito) wrote:
CatharticF1 <eferrari (AT) heaven (DOT) net> wrote:
Then where should he go - if not to the most successful team of the
previous 10 years?

Give or take the first four and the last two, of course...

Last two? There's been a team more successful than Ferrari in the
last 10 years?
No. But that wasn't my point. Saying "the last ten years" makes it sound
bigger than it was.
--
ric

ric at pixelligence dot com


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
Mark Jones
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Dear Kimi - 06-28-2006 , 05:52 PM



On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:25:36 +0200, ADDRESS (AT) IN (DOT) SIG (ric zito) wrote:
Quote:
Mark Jones <Mark (AT) Jones (DOT) co.nz> wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:45:57 +0200, address (AT) in (DOT) sig (ric zito) wrote:
CatharticF1 <eferrari (AT) heaven (DOT) net> wrote:
Then where should he go - if not to the most successful team of the
previous 10 years?

Give or take the first four and the last two, of course...

Last two? There's been a team more successful than Ferrari in the
last 10 years?

No. But that wasn't my point. Saying "the last ten years" makes it sound
bigger than it was.
Well since MS joined the team in 1996, and was winning races for them
in that year, ten years is an appropriate staring point.

- Jones


Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old   
ric zito
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Dear Kimi - 06-29-2006 , 03:46 AM



Mark Jones <Mark (AT) Jones (DOT) co.nz> wrote:

Quote:
Then where should he go - if not to the most successful team of the
previous 10 years?

Give or take the first four and the last two, of course...

Last two? There's been a team more successful than Ferrari in the
last 10 years?

No. But that wasn't my point. Saying "the last ten years" makes it sound
bigger than it was.

Well since MS joined the team in 1996, and was winning races for them
in that year, ten years is an appropriate staring point.
Not at all. We were talking about the team. MS hasn't even entered the
discussion thus far. The start or otherwise of his Ferrari tenure is
irrelevant to the point I was making.
--
ric at pixelligence dot com


Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old   
Mark Jones
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Dear Kimi - 06-29-2006 , 05:36 PM



On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:46:27 +0200, address (AT) in (DOT) sig (ric zito) wrote:
Quote:
Mark Jones <Mark (AT) Jones (DOT) co.nz> wrote:
Then where should he go - if not to the most successful team of the
previous 10 years?

Give or take the first four and the last two, of course...

Last two? There's been a team more successful than Ferrari in the
last 10 years?

No. But that wasn't my point. Saying "the last ten years" makes it sound
bigger than it was.

Well since MS joined the team in 1996, and was winning races for them
in that year, ten years is an appropriate staring point.

Not at all. We were talking about the team. MS hasn't even entered the
discussion thus far. The start or otherwise of his Ferrari tenure is
irrelevant to the point I was making.
Well then why stick to ten years at all? Why not 30 years, or 50?
Your point seems to be that Ferrari both have and haven't been the
most successful team of the last ten years. So much for trying to get
a little clarification.

- Jones


Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old   
ric zito
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Dear Kimi - 06-29-2006 , 06:45 PM



Mark Jones <Mark (AT) Jones (DOT) co.nz> wrote:

Quote:
Not at all. We were talking about the team. MS hasn't even entered the
discussion thus far. The start or otherwise of his Ferrari tenure is
irrelevant to the point I was making.

Well then why stick to ten years at all? Why not 30 years, or 50?
Well that's quite my point. The "ten years" thing wasn't me - I was
responding to it.

Whatever. It's a pretty stupid point anyway, in hindsight. :-)
--
ric at pixelligence dot com


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.