Friday Practice 2 - Massa!

#11

On 16 Mar 2007 17:09:07 +0200, Phil Carmody
<thefatphil_demunged (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Quote:

as soon as I've completed reading one newsgroup
I'm thrown headlong into the (subject line summary of) the next
newsgroup.

rotfl! What a pathetic attempt at justification.

Daytona

#12

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:42:29 -0000, "BigBird"
<bigbird.usenet (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

To be reasonable is to fall in line with accepted protocol.

However much you might like to force it on everyone else, it isn't
accepted protocol.

Daytona

#13

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:41:19 +0000, Daytona <me (AT) privacy (DOT) net> wrote:

Quote:

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:42:29 -0000, "BigBird"
bigbird.usenet (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

To be reasonable is to fall in line with accepted protocol.

However much you might like to force it on everyone else, it isn't
accepted protocol.

WTF? Is common courtesy still not an accepted protocol ?

--

Regards, Frank

#14

In message <5g1mv29okka80ipcp156svsq5i7jvub35m (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, a_Frank
<fajp (AT) notthis (DOT) optushome.com.au> writes

Quote:

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:41:19 +0000, Daytona <me (AT) privacy (DOT) net> wrote:

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:42:29 -0000, "BigBird"
bigbird.usenet (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

To be reasonable is to fall in line with accepted protocol.

However much you might like to force it on everyone else, it isn't
accepted protocol.

WTF? Is common courtesy still not an accepted protocol ?

Evidently not.

Me, I thought it was agreed practice in this group not to post spoilers.
Whatever is or is not agreed practice, I think people who do post
spoilers deliberately are among the saddest, most pathetic individuals
in Usenet. I can never understand ghastly little runts who get their
pleasure by spoiling other people's.
--
Richard Miller

#15

Daytona <me (AT) privacy (DOT) net> writes:

Quote:

On 16 Mar 2007 17:09:07 +0200, Phil Carmody
thefatphil_demunged (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

as soon as I've completed reading one newsgroup
I'm thrown headlong into the (subject line summary of) the next
newsgroup.

rotfl! What a pathetic attempt at justification.

It's not a justification, it's an explication. Learn the difference.

Phil
--
"Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank
so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of
/In God We Trust, Inc./.

#16

On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 04:31:13 -0000, "BigBird"
<bigbird.usenet (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

At best hey can kf you and hope you don't circumvent it.

Quite. If someone is unwilling to read posts talking about F1 in an F1
newsgroup, it's their problem, not the people who post.

Quote:

Are you an adolescent by any chance. Your choice to see a reasonable request
as oppression of your "rights" is somewhat stereotypical of teens with a
chemical imbalance ala Harry Enfield.

Personal attacks - the last refuge of the intolerant.

Daytona

#17

On 17 Mar 2007 02:03:04 +0200, Phil Carmody
<thefatphil_demunged (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Quote:

Daytona <me (AT) privacy (DOT) net> writes:
On 16 Mar 2007 17:09:07 +0200, Phil Carmody
thefatphil_demunged (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

as soon as I've completed reading one newsgroup
I'm thrown headlong into the (subject line summary of) the next
newsgroup.

rotfl! What a pathetic attempt at justification.

It's not a justification, it's an explication. Learn the difference.

rotfl! What a pathetic attempt at an explication.

Daytona

#18

Daytona <me (AT) privacy (DOT) net> writes:

Quote:

On 17 Mar 2007 02:03:04 +0200, Phil Carmody
thefatphil_demunged (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Daytona <me (AT) privacy (DOT) net> writes:
On 16 Mar 2007 17:09:07 +0200, Phil Carmody
thefatphil_demunged (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

as soon as I've completed reading one newsgroup
I'm thrown headlong into the (subject line summary of) the next
newsgroup.

rotfl! What a pathetic attempt at justification.

It's not a justification, it's an explication. Learn the difference.

rotfl! What a pathetic attempt at an explication.

Your pathetic ability to comprehend simple things seems to be
the prevailing conclusion from this thread. If you didn't
understand what I said, then I don't feel bad at all, I simply
pity your overworked brainstem which has to make up for the
lack of functionality in the rest of your corteces.

You evidently have nothing useful to say, you may as well join
the killfile now.

*PLONK*

Phil
--
"Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank
so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of
/In God We Trust, Inc./.

#19

Phil Carmody wrote:

Quote:

Daytona <me (AT) privacy (DOT) net> writes:
On 17 Mar 2007 02:03:04 +0200, Phil Carmody
thefatphil_demunged (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Daytona <me (AT) privacy (DOT) net> writes:
On 16 Mar 2007 17:09:07 +0200, Phil Carmody
thefatphil_demunged (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

as soon as I've completed reading one newsgroup
I'm thrown headlong into the (subject line summary of) the next
newsgroup.

rotfl! What a pathetic attempt at justification.

It's not a justification, it's an explication. Learn the
difference.

rotfl! What a pathetic attempt at an explication.

Your pathetic ability to comprehend simple things seems to be
the prevailing conclusion from this thread. If you didn't
understand what I said, then I don't feel bad at all, I simply
pity your overworked brainstem which has to make up for the
lack of functionality in the rest of your corteces.

You evidently have nothing useful to say, you may as well join
the killfile now.

PLONK

Phil

Where do they come from? Every year, at the start of the season, we get
these fuckwits posting their drivel here for a while, until they
eventually tire and crawl away.

Sheesh!

--
Paul-B Formula 1 - cheat-free version here now.

#20

BigBird wrote:

Quote:

"Daytona" <me (AT) privacy (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:akcnv2t70e59vlc2hgts99o63rlnikjlg1 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...

On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 04:31:13 -0000, "BigBird"
bigbird.usenet (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

At best hey can kf you and hope you don't circumvent it.

Quite. If someone is unwilling to read posts talking about F1 in an F1
newsgroup, it's their problem, not the people who post.

So the subject is completely beyond your comprehesion. Oh dear.
So little was asked of you, yet you were found wanting.

There have been a multitude of posts in rasf1 since qualifying and do you
know what all are about F1 and not one of them with a spoiler in the header.

I just realised you are from another crossposted group so fortuneately your
lack of respect for others is not our problem.

You can get back to bitching about the ITV ad breaks, which seemed to be the
predominant subject in that group last time I had a look in..

Are you an adolescent by any chance. Your choice to see a reasonable
request
as oppression of your "rights" is somewhat stereotypical of teens with a
chemical imbalance ala Harry Enfield.

Personal attacks - the last refuge of the intolerant.

It's an observation. The irony in your reply is laughable.

Daytona won this debate.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Friday Practice 2 - Massa!

Formula 1 Formula 1 motor racing discusions (rec.autos.sport.f1)

Re: Friday Practice 2 - Massa! - 03-16-2007 , 02:38 PM

Re: Friday Practice 2 - Massa! - 03-16-2007 , 02:41 PM

Re: Friday Practice 2 - Massa! - 03-16-2007 , 04:03 PM

Re: Friday Practice 2 - Massa! - 03-16-2007 , 06:10 PM

Re: Friday Practice 2 - Massa! - 03-16-2007 , 07:03 PM

Re: Friday Practice 2 - Massa! - 03-17-2007 , 04:23 AM

Re: Friday Practice 2 - Massa! - 03-17-2007 , 04:25 AM

Re: Friday Practice 2 - Massa! - 03-17-2007 , 05:16 AM

Re: Friday Practice 2 - Massa! - 03-17-2007 , 05:25 AM

Re: Friday Practice 2 - Massa! - 03-17-2007 , 05:30 AM