![]() | |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
Alister wrote: On 11/07/09 13:02, David Melville wrote: KDE or GNOME ? Thank you. XFCE! Yes, even better. a friend swears by openbox but I wont work correctly on my Aspire Once |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
Frank Adam wrote: On 7 Nov 2009 15:45:15 GMT, "Paul-B" <paul (AT) rasf1 (DOT) net> wrote: David Melville wrote: KDE or GNOME ? Thank you. KDE for me. XPSP3 for me. ![]() Btw Paul, how is Windows 7 ? I know you've given it a workout, so any last comments ? Or rights ? ![]() Just to butt in, i've been using 7 for about 3 months now. Best upgrade my latop has ever had (apart from the dual boot Ubuntu i've installed since.) So much lighter and quicker than Vista. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
Mike wrote: Frank Adam wrote: On 7 Nov 2009 15:45:15 GMT, "Paul-B" <paul (AT) rasf1 (DOT) net> wrote: David Melville wrote: KDE or GNOME ? Thank you. KDE for me. XPSP3 for me. ![]() Btw Paul, how is Windows 7 ? I know you've given it a workout, so any last comments ? Or rights ? ![]() Just to butt in, i've been using 7 for about 3 months now. Best upgrade my latop has ever had (apart from the dual boot Ubuntu i've installed since.) So much lighter and quicker than Vista. If I might chime in too ... been running it for almost 18 months and all the faults with Vista went away and my laptop hasn't looked back, and it's not a very powerful laptop at that. Going to install the RTM on my desktop and laptop whenever I get a spare weekend to make sure everything is backed up fully and get all the applications back together. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
martin <usenet (AT) etiqa (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Mike wrote: Frank Adam wrote: On 7 Nov 2009 15:45:15 GMT, "Paul-B" <paul (AT) rasf1 (DOT) net> wrote: David Melville wrote: KDE or GNOME ? Thank you. KDE for me. XPSP3 for me. ![]() Btw Paul, how is Windows 7 ? I know you've given it a workout, so any last comments ? Or rights ? ![]() Just to butt in, i've been using 7 for about 3 months now. Best upgrade my latop has ever had (apart from the dual boot Ubuntu i've installed since.) So much lighter and quicker than Vista. If I might chime in too ... been running it for almost 18 months and all the faults with Vista went away and my laptop hasn't looked back, and it's not a very powerful laptop at that. Going to install the RTM on my desktop and laptop whenever I get a spare weekend to make sure everything is backed up fully and get all the applications back together. Out of interest, would anyone care to hasard a guess as to whether Windows 7 will run on my 5 year old Compaq Presario laptop? I'm running XP on it OK - a little slowly but quite bearable - never went to Vista, but I'd like to give 7 a shot. I tried the beta in Parallels on the Mac, and found it quite snappy and pleasant. Laptop specs (very modest) : 2Ghz Intel 4m / 1Gb RAM / 160Gb HD / ATI onboard video 64mb |
|
Actually, if the damned Adobe Creative Suite were only available on Linux, I'd ditch Win altogether and install Ubuntu on it like a shot. It's so much lighter on resources than XP, that it'd be like getting a new laptop. Adobe's absence is actually the only thing preventing me from doing that. <sigh |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
KDE or GNOME ? Thank you. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
KDE or GNOME ? Thank you. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
martin <usenet (AT) etiqa (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Mike wrote: Frank Adam wrote: On 7 Nov 2009 15:45:15 GMT, "Paul-B" <paul (AT) rasf1 (DOT) net> wrote: David Melville wrote: KDE or GNOME ? Thank you. KDE for me. XPSP3 for me. ![]() Btw Paul, how is Windows 7 ? I know you've given it a workout, so any last comments ? Or rights ? ![]() Just to butt in, i've been using 7 for about 3 months now. Best upgrade my latop has ever had (apart from the dual boot Ubuntu i've installed since.) So much lighter and quicker than Vista. If I might chime in too ... been running it for almost 18 months and all the faults with Vista went away and my laptop hasn't looked back, and it's not a very powerful laptop at that. Going to install the RTM on my desktop and laptop whenever I get a spare weekend to make sure everything is backed up fully and get all the applications back together. Out of interest, would anyone care to hasard a guess as to whether Windows 7 will run on my 5 year old Compaq Presario laptop? I'm running XP on it OK - a little slowly but quite bearable - never went to Vista, but I'd like to give 7 a shot. I tried the beta in Parallels on the Mac, and found it quite snappy and pleasant. Laptop specs (very modest) : 2Ghz Intel 4m / 1Gb RAM / 160Gb HD / ATI onboard video 64mb Actually, if the damned Adobe Creative Suite were only available on Linux, I'd ditch Win altogether and install Ubuntu on it like a shot. It's so much lighter on resources than XP, that it'd be like getting a new laptop. Adobe's absence is actually the only thing preventing me from doing that. <sigh Try this upgrade advisor |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
martin <usenet (AT) etiqa (DOT) co.uk> wrote: Mike wrote: Frank Adam wrote: On 7 Nov 2009 15:45:15 GMT, "Paul-B" <paul (AT) rasf1 (DOT) net> wrote: David Melville wrote: KDE or GNOME ? Thank you. KDE for me. XPSP3 for me. ![]() Btw Paul, how is Windows 7 ? I know you've given it a workout, so any last comments ? Or rights ? ![]() Just to butt in, i've been using 7 for about 3 months now. Best upgrade my latop has ever had (apart from the dual boot Ubuntu i've installed since.) So much lighter and quicker than Vista. If I might chime in too ... been running it for almost 18 months and all the faults with Vista went away and my laptop hasn't looked back, and it's not a very powerful laptop at that. Going to install the RTM on my desktop and laptop whenever I get a spare weekend to make sure everything is backed up fully and get all the applications back together. Out of interest, would anyone care to hasard a guess as to whether Windows 7 will run on my 5 year old Compaq Presario laptop? I'm running XP on it OK - a little slowly but quite bearable - never went to Vista, but I'd like to give 7 a shot. I tried the beta in Parallels on the Mac, and found it quite snappy and pleasant. Laptop specs (very modest) : 2Ghz Intel 4m / 1Gb RAM / 160Gb HD / ATI onboard video 64mb Actually, if the damned Adobe Creative Suite were only available on Linux, I'd ditch Win altogether and install Ubuntu on it like a shot. It's so much lighter on resources than XP, that it'd be like getting a new laptop. Adobe's absence is actually the only thing preventing me from doing that. <sigh |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
David Melville wrote: KDE or GNOME ? Thank you. Neither. Stop wasting your time and install a proper OS like Windows 7. |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:07:40 +1100, Mike <none (AT) none (DOT) none> wrote: David Melville wrote: KDE or GNOME ? Thank you. Neither. Stop wasting your time and install a proper OS like Windows 7. Hmmmmmm. An OS I (should) pay for, loaded with software I (should) pay for, or.... A free OS that works just as well, is more customizable, faster, boots and shuts down in a flash, small, with freely available software which is every bit the replacement for all the other (ostensibly paid-for) software I used under my (ostensibly paid-for) OS. Tough decision. I've been loving it since day 2. don't forget security. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |