![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
According to Montezemolo. From La Gazzetta dello Sport: "We are content with Raikkonen. His retirement in the Grand Prix on Sunday was our fault. If his car had made it to the finish, he would be much higher in the driver classification than he is now." |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
forty wrote: According to Montezemolo. From La Gazzetta dello Sport: "We are content with Raikkonen. His retirement in the Grand Prix on Sunday was our fault. If his car had made it to the finish, he would be much higher in the driver classification than he is now." Montezemolo? WTF does he know? We have it from that fount of all knowledge, Lardboy aka Luigi that it was all Kimi's fault. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
According to Montezemolo. From La Gazzetta dello Sport: "We are content with Raikkonen. His retirement in the Grand Prix on Sunday was our fault. If his car had made it to the finish, he would be much higher in the driver classification than he is now." |
|
forty "To embrace an extreme, one must first let go of reason." |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Paul-B wrote: forty wrote: According to Montezemolo. From La Gazzetta dello Sport: "We are content with Raikkonen. His retirement in the Grand Prix on Sunday was our fault. If his car had made it to the finish, he would be much higher in the driver classification than he is now." Montezemolo? WTF does he know? We have it from that fount of all knowledge, Lardboy aka Luigi that it was all Kimi's fault. Clearly, as he must have a more accurate understanding of the inner workings of Ferrari. WTF does their President know? Hm.. do CEOs actually know where their factories are ? ;-) |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
"We are content with Raikkonen. His retirement in the Grand Prix on Sunday was our fault. If his car had made it to the finish, he would be much higher in the driver classification than he is now." |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |