![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
""Lewis has lucked into a fabulous car," Mansell told website sportasylum.com AMEN, thats correct, put him in a RedBull and Webber would destoy him.... M/P Nige would know, he's been in the greatest of F1 machines and still failed; yet |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
""Lewis has lucked into a fabulous car," Mansell told website sportasylum.com AMEN, thats correct, put him in a RedBull and Webber would destoy him.... |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
In the same article, Nigel went on to condemn Hamilton's lacklustre performance, with the words, "But what he has been able to do is excellent, if not fantastic." |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:02:22 +0100, Richard Miller richard (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote: In the same article, Nigel went on to condemn Hamilton's lacklustre performance, with the words, "But what he has been able to do is excellent, if not fantastic." That's condemnation? Does your side of the pond have a definition of the word that we don't? -- Larry "looks like it's made of iron" |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:02:22 +0100, Richard Miller richard (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote: In the same article, Nigel went on to condemn Hamilton's lacklustre performance, with the words, "But what he has been able to do is excellent, if not fantastic." That's condemnation? Does your side of the pond have a definition of the word that we don't? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:02:22 +0100, Richard Miller richard (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote: In the same article, Nigel went on to condemn Hamilton's lacklustre performance, with the words, "But what he has been able to do is excellent, if not fantastic." That's condemnation? Does your side of the pond have a definition of the word that we don't? |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
In the same article, Nigel went on to condemn Hamilton's lacklustre performance, with the words, "But what he has been able to do is excellent, if not fantastic." That's condemnation? Does your side of the pond have a definition of the word that we don't? No, we have the ability to both utilise, and understand, irony. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 21 Apr 2007 21:26:05 +0300, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk wrote: In the same article, Nigel went on to condemn Hamilton's lacklustre performance, with the words, "But what he has been able to do is excellent, if not fantastic." That's condemnation? Does your side of the pond have a definition of the word that we don't? No, we have the ability to both utilise, and understand, irony. Not out of context, you don't. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
pltrgyst wrote: On 21 Apr 2007 21:26:05 +0300, Phil Carmody thefatphil_demunged (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk wrote: In the same article, Nigel went on to condemn Hamilton's lacklustre performance, with the words, "But what he has been able to do is excellent, if not fantastic." That's condemnation? Does your side of the pond have a definition of the word that we don't? No, we have the ability to both utilise, and understand, irony. Not out of context, you don't. I don't think you'll find any Brits reading this who won't understand what was meant by the above. However I'm sure you're not at all alone among the non-Brits. Seems to be it's only us that really delight in saying one thing and meaning the exact opposite. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |