![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tommo wrote: On Nov 3, 12:25 pm, Sir Tim <bent... (AT) brooklands (DOT) co.uk> wrote: There was an item on Sky News this morning about the conventions of poppy-wearing in which it was remarked upon that Eddie Jordan wasn't wearing one on Sunday. snip I rather admire EJ for not wearing one. -- Henry Birkin Bt. As he is Irish, I suspect that there may be a historical reason for him not wanting to wear a visible mark of support for the British army. And what of all the other countries that use the poppy as a symbol of remembrance? Surely you don't believe that we're all *just* supporting the British armed forces? (And I also tend to dislike the political correctness of public figures with their poppies on display. Especially politicians -- although I must admit being disposed to dislike *them* at the slightest provocation. <grin>) |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
Yes, there's nothing more edifying than watching politicians queuing up on Remembrance Sunday to lay wreaths in memory of the dead, and then hot-footing it back to Westminster on the Monday to [...] |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
I rather admire EJ for not wearing one. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
There was an item on Sky News this morning about the conventions of poppy-wearing in which it was remarked upon that Eddie Jordan wasn't wearing one on Sunday. I must say that I noticed the same thing but it seems that a sort of Poppy Fascism has developed amongst broadcasters in the UK where it is de rigueur for everybody to wear a poppy from somewhere around the middle of October until November 11th and the first question anybody about to make an appearance on TV is asked by the producer is, "are you wearing a poppy?" I have been a soldier (although never on active service) and consider that I have more respect than most for the sacrifices made by our servicemen during this and the last centuries but I think that the respect implied by the wearing of a poppy is seriously degraded when it becomes a politically correct requirement rather than a personal gesture of remembrance. I rather admire EJ for not wearing one. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
If EJ has problems with the "british occupation" that is one thing, but can he state absolutely that *none* of his ancestors or relatives fought in any branch of the British military since McRae wrote that poem? Surely that would be the reason to consider. I don't think EJ has given any reason for not wearing a poppy and nor |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
Sir Tim <bentley (AT) brooklands (DOT) co.uk> wrote in news:2680f5pd4kcsa9k35u2hp7ovb282qgl169 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com: I rather admire EJ for not wearing one. Not me. I wear one (*every* year) because of the Canadians that died in Pashendale and other horror spots in Europe over the last century along with other more strange places they've been more recently. I has very recently come to my attention that the Canadians in Afganistan have the highest causalty rate of any of the "allied" forces there. Every Canadian soldier has a 1 in 61 chance of not coming back alive every tour. About the same as the Russians when they invaded. If EJ has problems with the "british occupation" that is one thing, but can he state absolutely that *none* of his ancestors or relatives fought in any branch of the British military since McRae wrote that poem? Surely that would be the reason to consider. I refer of course to "In Flanders Fields". |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
In message <Xns9CB88AF223AACAPLer (AT) 127 (DOT) 0.0.1>, APLer <APLer (AT) floor (DOT) tilde writes If EJ has problems with the "british occupation" that is one thing, but can he state absolutely that *none* of his ancestors or relatives fought in any branch of the British military since McRae wrote that poem? Surely that would be the reason to consider. I don't think EJ has given any reason for not wearing a poppy and nor should he. Its a personal choice and I don't know why we are even discussing it. Then you don't know why people wear one either. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
Paul Giverin <paul (AT) giverin (DOT) co.uk> wrote in news:k04C0CDIoT8KFwER (AT) 10 (DOT) 0.0.3: In message <Xns9CB88AF223AACAPLer (AT) 127 (DOT) 0.0.1>, APLer <APLer (AT) floor (DOT) tilde writes If EJ has problems with the "british occupation" that is one thing, but can he state absolutely that *none* of his ancestors or relatives fought in any branch of the British military since McRae wrote that poem? Surely that would be the reason to consider. I don't think EJ has given any reason for not wearing a poppy and nor should he. Its a personal choice and I don't know why we are even discussing it. Then you don't know why people wear one either. That's right because I'm sure not everyone wears theirs for the same |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
In message <Xns9CB88AF223AACAPLer (AT) 127 (DOT) 0.0.1>, APLer <APLer (AT) floor (DOT) tilde writes If EJ has problems with the "british occupation" that is one thing, but can he state absolutely that *none* of his ancestors or relatives fought in any branch of the British military since McRae wrote that poem? Surely that would be the reason to consider. I don't think EJ has given any reason for not wearing a poppy and nor should he. Its a personal choice and I don't know why we are even discussing it. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |