Raikkonen says McLaren the only option

#11

On Nov 4, 8:23*pm, Alister <alis... (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

On 11/04/09 08:39, peter wrote:

Paul Giverin <p... (AT) giverin (DOT) co.uk> writes
CatharticF1 <rasf1pos... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> writes
build <bui... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in news:0e1687d0-2275-4ab5-9e9d-
He reckons the problem is that KR
wants certain clauses in the contract ensuring certain rights which
McLaren will not concede, yet. In other words KR will not be a number
two driver.

I am shocked at the prospect that Lewis may not accept a driver of equal
status.

Could you just point out the bit of the original post that states that
Lewis would not accept a driver of equal status?
Stop making it up!

LOL indeeed...why does
"KR wants certain clauses in the contract ensuring certain rights which
McLaren will not concede "
equate to LH not being prepared to accept a driver of equal status
rather than KR wanting No. 1 status?

"In other words KR will not be a number two driver."
Oh I see..its some other fool making it up as he goes along....as you were.

& that could easily be KR wants no 1 status. this is all just guess work
without any access to any of the facts
time will tell.

It is guess work, no facts included, indeed a second hand
interpretation.
I doubt McLaren would be able to give KR No1 status.
I don't think LH would have a problem with equal status, he knows
where the teams focus will be.

beers,
build

#12

Richard Miller <richard (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote in
news:IzoXzBI6Rf8KFwhO (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk:

Quote:

In message <Xns9CB98A81894D5rasf1postergmailcom (AT) 203 (DOT) 26.24.228>,
CatharticF1 <rasf1poster (AT) gmail (DOT) com> writes
build <buildy (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in news:0e1687d0-2275-4ab5-9e9d-
0bc3e0967d5c (AT) q40g2000prh (DOT) googlegroups.com:

That brought about a discussion about Kimi going to McLaren. He was
amused that McLaren say money is the problem when they won't be
paying any, a sponsor is funding the move. He reckons the problem is
that KR wants certain clauses in the contract ensuring certain
rights which McLaren will not concede, yet. In other words KR will
not be a number two driver.

I am shocked at the prospect that Lewis may not accept a driver of
equal status.

And I am anything but shocked that you could invent such a lie from
the above statement. It is entirely par for the course for you.

OK, so I could reply to any number of posters, but I'll choose Richard
because his is the last I read

And while it is terribly entertaining and I know you're all used to my
'bait' being tasty, those sleeping at the back need some Red Bull:

1. I did not put the idea forward that Lewis wouldn't be equal number 1,
I replied to it. 2. I didn't present it as a fact. Congrats Mr Bird on
your usual comprehension. Heck it was "the prospect that Lewis may not
accept a driver of equal status". Definitive, huh? 3. It would not
admittedly surprise me if he or his Manager didn't want an equal number
1. So would any amongst you rule that out? 4. I don't have an issue with
it, never did. We're talking about the elite Alpha Males.

--
CatharticF1

"What you thought was freedom is just greed."

#13

CatharticF1 <rasf1poster (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in
news:Xns9CBA82538AF4Drasf1postergmailcom (AT) 203 (DOT) 26.24.228:

Quote:

Richard Miller <richard (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote in
news:IzoXzBI6Rf8KFwhO (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk:

In message <Xns9CB98A81894D5rasf1postergmailcom (AT) 203 (DOT) 26.24.228>,
CatharticF1 <rasf1poster (AT) gmail (DOT) com> writes
build <buildy (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in news:0e1687d0-2275-4ab5-9e9d-
0bc3e0967d5c (AT) q40g2000prh (DOT) googlegroups.com:

That brought about a discussion about Kimi going to McLaren. He was
amused that McLaren say money is the problem when they won't be
paying any, a sponsor is funding the move. He reckons the problem is
that KR wants certain clauses in the contract ensuring certain
rights which McLaren will not concede, yet. In other words KR will
not be a number two driver.

I am shocked at the prospect that Lewis may not accept a driver of
equal status.

And I am anything but shocked that you could invent such a lie from
the above statement. It is entirely par for the course for you.

OK, so I could reply to any number of posters, but I'll choose Richard
because his is the last I read

And while it is terribly entertaining and I know you're all used to my
'bait' being tasty, those sleeping at the back need some Red Bull:

1. I did not put the idea forward that Lewis wouldn't be equal number 1,
I replied to it.

2. I didn't present it as a fact. Congrats Mr Bird on your usual
comprehension. Heck it was "the prospect that Lewis may not accept a
driver of equal status". Definitive, huh?

3. It would not admittedly surprise me if he or his Manager didn't want
an equal number 1. So would any amongst you rule that out?

4. I don't have an issue with it, never did. We're talking about the
elite Alpha Males.

Wow, did the numbering pass through an obfuscation filter

?
This time for sure!

--
CatharticF1

"What you thought was freedom is just greed."

#14

CatharticF1 wrote:

<snip self-serving nonsense>

It wasn't worth reading once, let alone repeating it.

Everyone here knows exactly what you have against Lewis. You've shown
it time and again.

--
Paul-B

#15

"Paul-B" <paul (AT) rasf1 (DOT) net> wrote in news:7lfbgaF3b9rbsU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net:

Quote:

CatharticF1 wrote:

snip self-serving nonsense

It wasn't worth reading once, let alone repeating it.

Everyone here knows exactly what you have against Lewis. You've shown
it time and again.

Your judgement is independent of anything I type, Paul.
Twas ever thus!

--
CatharticF1

"What you thought was freedom is just greed."

#16

On Nov 5, 7:13*am, CatharticF1 <rasf1pos... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

"Paul-B" <p... (AT) rasf1 (DOT) net> wrote innews:7lfbgaF3b9rbsU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net:

CatharticF1 wrote:

snip self-serving nonsense

It wasn't worth reading once, let alone repeating it.

Everyone here knows exactly what you have against Lewis. You've shown
it time and again.

Your judgement is independent of anything I type, Paul.
Twas ever thus!

And you only serve to reinforce it.

#17

In message <Xns9CBAA68786B8Arasf1postergmailcom (AT) 203 (DOT) 26.24.228>,
CatharticF1 <rasf1poster (AT) gmail (DOT) com> writes

Quote:

1. I did not put the idea forward that Lewis wouldn't be equal number 1,
I replied to it.

Complete and utter bollox!!!!!

Below is the quote you were replying to and it does not put forward the
idea that Lewis wouldn't accept equal status:-

Quote:

That brought about a discussion about Kimi going to McLaren. He was
amused that McLaren say money is the problem when they won't be paying
any, a sponsor is funding the move. He reckons the problem is that KR
wants certain clauses in the contract ensuring certain rights which
McLaren will not concede, yet. In other words KR will not be a number
two driver.

As you can see, that quote does not mention Lewis. Its all in your
pathetic and juvenile little mind.

--
Paul Giverin

My photos:- www.pbase.com/vendee

#18

CatharticF1 wrote:

Quote:

Richard Miller <richard (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote in
news:IzoXzBI6Rf8KFwhO (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk:

In message <Xns9CB98A81894D5rasf1postergmailcom (AT) 203 (DOT) 26.24.228>,
CatharticF1 <rasf1poster (AT) gmail (DOT) com> writes
build <buildy (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in news:0e1687d0-2275-4ab5-9e9d-
0bc3e0967d5c (AT) q40g2000prh (DOT) googlegroups.com:

That brought about a discussion about Kimi going to McLaren. He
was >>> amused that McLaren say money is the problem when they won't
be >>> paying any, a sponsor is funding the move. He reckons the
problem is >>> that KR wants certain clauses in the contract ensuring
certain >>> rights which McLaren will not concede, yet. In other
words KR will >>> not be a number two driver.

I am shocked at the prospect that Lewis may not accept a driver of
equal status.

And I am anything but shocked that you could invent such a lie from
the above statement. It is entirely par for the course for you.

OK, so I could reply to any number of posters, but I'll choose Richard
because his is the last I read

And while it is terribly entertaining and I know you're all used to my
'bait' being tasty, those sleeping at the back need some Red Bull:

1. I did not put the idea forward that Lewis wouldn't be equal number
1, I replied to it. 2. I didn't present it as a fact. Congrats Mr
Bird on your usual comprehension. Heck it was "the prospect that
Lewis may not accept a driver of equal status".

There is no prospect unless you treat the comment as much more than the
imaginings of a mischievous urchin.

Your comment is equal in merit with someone who might pop up only to
ask what the prospect of Ferrari cheating again this year would be.

That is your level now Brenda.

I'm happy enough to reveal you as still no more than a trolling clown.

Quote:

Definitive, huh? 3.
It would not admittedly surprise me if he or his Manager didn't want
an equal number 1. So would any amongst you rule that out? 4. I don't
have an issue with it, never did. We're talking about the elite Alpha
Males.

Of course you don't. Mickey lived by the No.1 status rule. If he pissed
in your face you would lap it up and declare it what any God should do
for his fans.

I have no problem with fighting fire with fire. I think it robs the
sport of a dimension though and would prefer it avoided.

--
Bigbird
#

#19

CatharticF1 wrote:

Quote:

"Paul-B" <paul (AT) rasf1 (DOT) net> wrote in
news:7lfbgaF3b9rbsU1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net:

CatharticF1 wrote:

snip self-serving nonsense

It wasn't worth reading once, let alone repeating it.

Everyone here knows exactly what you have against Lewis. You've
shown it time and again.

Your judgement is independent of anything I type, Paul.
Twas ever thus!

Are you deliberately parodying yourself or do you really not see the
irony.

--
Bigbird
#

#20

Paul Giverin <paul (AT) giverin (DOT) co.uk> wrote in
news:S+Qv2gCrGp8KFwjh (AT) 10 (DOT) 0.0.3:

Quote:

In message <Xns9CBAA68786B8Arasf1postergmailcom (AT) 203 (DOT) 26.24.228>,
CatharticF1 <rasf1poster (AT) gmail (DOT) com> writes

1. I did not put the idea forward that Lewis wouldn't be equal number
1, I replied to it.

Complete and utter bollox!!!!!

You are a liar.

Quote:

Below is the quote you were replying to and it does not put forward
the idea that Lewis wouldn't accept equal status:-

That brought about a discussion about Kimi going to McLaren. He was
amused that McLaren say money is the problem when they won't be
paying any, a sponsor is funding the move. He reckons the problem is
that KR wants certain clauses in the contract ensuring certain rights
which McLaren will not concede, yet. In other words KR will not be a
number two driver.

As you can see, that quote does not mention Lewis. Its all in your
pathetic and juvenile little mind.

If you were capable of deductive logic you'd see how big an arse you
are.

--
CatharticF1

"What you thought was freedom is just greed."