 | |
Raikkonen says McLaren the only option
Formula 1 Formula 1 motor racing discusions (rec.autos.sport.f1)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: Raikkonen says McLaren the only option -
11-05-2009
, 07:36 PM
|
CatharticF1 wrote: Richard Miller <richard (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote in news:IzoXzBI6Rf8KFwhO (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk: In message <Xns9CB98A81894D5rasf1postergmailcom (AT) 203 (DOT) 26.24.228>, CatharticF1 <rasf1poster (AT) gmail (DOT) com> writes build <buildy (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in news:0e1687d0-2275-4ab5-9e9d- 0bc3e0967d5c (AT) q40g2000prh (DOT) googlegroups.com: That brought about a discussion about Kimi going to McLaren. He was >>> amused that McLaren say money is the problem when they won't be >>> paying any, a sponsor is funding the move. He reckons the problem is >>> that KR wants certain clauses in the contract ensuring certain >>> rights which McLaren will not concede, yet. In other words KR will >>> not be a number two driver. I am shocked at the prospect that Lewis may not accept a driver of equal status. And I am anything but shocked that you could invent such a lie from the above statement. It is entirely par for the course for you. OK, so I could reply to any number of posters, but I'll choose Richard because his is the last I read  And while it is terribly entertaining and I know you're all used to my 'bait' being tasty, those sleeping at the back need some Red Bull: 1. I did not put the idea forward that Lewis wouldn't be equal number 1, I replied to it. 2. I didn't present it as a fact. Congrats Mr Bird on your usual comprehension. Heck it was "the prospect that Lewis may not accept a driver of equal status". There is no prospect unless you treat the comment as much more than the imaginings of a mischievous urchin. Your comment is equal in merit with someone who might pop up only to ask what the prospect of Ferrari cheating again this year would be. That is your level now Brenda. I'm happy enough to reveal you as still no more than a trolling clown. Definitive, huh? 3. It would not admittedly surprise me if he or his Manager didn't want an equal number 1. So would any amongst you rule that out? 4. I don't have an issue with it, never did. We're talking about the elite Alpha Males. Of course you don't. Mickey lived by the No.1 status rule. If he pissed in your face you would lap it up and declare it what any God should do for his fans. I have no problem with fighting fire with fire. I think it robs the sport of a dimension though and would prefer it avoided. |
The implication that Lewis might not accept an equal number 1 is so
unpalatable. And worse - I didn't suggest it!
That the Britpack Idol is human is so unpleasant a possibility you'll all
obfuscate, deny and insult to distract from it.
Anyway - have another hollow tirade, Princess.
--
CatharticF1
"What you thought was freedom is just greed."
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
Paul Giverin <paul (AT) giverin (DOT) co.uk> wrote in news:S+Qv2gCrGp8KFwjh (AT) 10 (DOT) 0.0.3: In message <Xns9CBAA68786B8Arasf1postergmailcom (AT) 203 (DOT) 26.24.228>, CatharticF1 <rasf1poster (AT) gmail (DOT) com> writes 1. I did not put the idea forward that Lewis wouldn't be equal number 1, I replied to it. Complete and utter bollox!!!!! You are a liar. Could you elaborate. |
Quote:
|
Below is the quote you were replying to and it does not put forward the idea that Lewis wouldn't accept equal status:- That brought about a discussion about Kimi going to McLaren. He was amused that McLaren say money is the problem when they won't be paying any, a sponsor is funding the move. He reckons the problem is that KR wants certain clauses in the contract ensuring certain rights which McLaren will not concede, yet. In other words KR will not be a number two driver. As you can see, that quote does not mention Lewis. Its all in your pathetic and juvenile little mind. If you were capable of deductive logic you'd see how big an arse you are. Deductive logic? So nothing factual then? No surprise there. I don't |
Step back and try and see how other people perceive you.
--
Paul Giverin
My photos:- www.pbase.com/vendee
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Bigbird" <Bigbird.usenetNOS... (AT) Gmail (DOT) com> wrote innews:xn0ghacrn1acckk007 (AT) news (DOT) individual.net: CatharticF1 wrote: Richard Miller <rich... (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote in news:IzoXzBI6Rf8KFwhO (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk: In message <Xns9CB98A81894D5rasf1postergmail... (AT) 203 (DOT) 26.24.228>, CatharticF1 <rasf1pos... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> writes build <bui... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in news:0e1687d0-2275-4ab5-9e9d- 0bc3e0967... (AT) q40g2000prh (DOT) googlegroups.com: That brought about a discussion about Kimi going to McLaren. He was >>> amused that McLaren say money is the problem when they won't be >>> paying any, a sponsor is funding the move. He reckons the problem is >>> that KR wants certain clauses in the contract ensuring certain >>> rights which McLaren will not concede, yet. In other words KR will >>> not be a number two driver. I am shocked at the prospect that Lewis may not accept a driver of equal status. And I am anything but shocked that you could invent such a lie from the above statement. It is entirely par for the course for you. OK, so I could reply to any number of posters, but I'll choose Richard because his is the last I read And while it is terribly entertaining and I know you're all used to my 'bait' being tasty, those sleeping at the back need some Red Bull: 1. I did not put the idea forward that Lewis wouldn't be equal number 1, I replied to it. 2. I didn't present it as a fact. Congrats Mr Bird on your usual comprehension. Heck it was "the prospect that Lewis may not accept a driver of equal status". * There is no prospect unless you treat the comment as much more than the imaginings of a mischievous urchin. Your comment is equal in merit with someone who might pop up only to ask what the prospect of Ferrari cheating again this year would be. That is your level now Brenda. I'm happy enough to reveal you as still no more than a trolling clown. Definitive, huh? 3. It would not admittedly surprise me if he or his Manager didn't want an equal number 1. So would any amongst you rule that out? 4. I don't have an issue with it, never did. We're talking about the elite Alpha Males. Of course you don't. Mickey lived by the No.1 status rule. If he pissed in your face you would lap it up and declare it what any God should do for his fans. I have no problem with fighting fire with fire. I think it robs the sport of a dimension though and would prefer it avoided. It's hilarious how fragile the Britpack are. The implication that Lewis might not accept an equal number 1 is so unpalatable. And worse - I didn't suggest it! That the Britpack Idol is human is so unpleasant a possibility you'll all obfuscate, deny and insult to distract from it. Anyway - have another hollow tirade, Princess. |
can you? It's got /nothing/ to do with the supposed /britpack/ and
everything to do with the fact that you live in a little fantasy world
of your own, tin foil hat and conspiracies included. Go back to
watching the X-file and tell us it's a documentary and not just the
fictional musings of a TV script writer. That's even more hilarious
than anything you may percieve as 'funny'.
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.