 | |
Re: HMM, my take of yesterdays race and the incidents
Formula 1 Formula 1 motor racing discusions (rec.autos.sport.f1)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: HMM, my take of yesterdays race and the incidents -
07-01-2003
, 12:19 AM
|
Bob Helland <tifoso (AT) comcast (DOT) net> wrote: Why? He asks a completely legitimate question. Juan Pinball was obviously faster than Michael at that point. Why risk both their races with a dangerous, blunder-headed pass like that?? Michael said "I'd have done exactly the same thing". Or did you miss that one? |
David
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Sven Reloaded" <sbaumer (AT) informatik (DOT) uni-ulm.de.SpAm.Me.NoT> wrote in message |
Quote:
|
The stewards already did... "racing incident", no further measure. So what did they say happened then? |
[...]
The stewards did decide. After examining the evidence
of drivers and team representatives, and seeing
video and telemetric evidence the stewards decided that
"the incident requires no further judicial action".
Quote:
|
I'd love to hear this story er um fabrication. |
Sven.
--
All I need is a little time,
To get behind this sun and cast my weight,
All I need is a peace of this mind,
Then I can celebrate.
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
No. He conveniently ignores it. As, of course, does Brendan... |
when that suits.
--
Cheerie-vederci . . .
j a m e s
Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly.
-- Gilbert Keith Chesterton
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Bob Helland wrote: "Fritz" <fritz1138 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:bdqbmr$vsi7j$1 (AT) ID-153955 (DOT) news.dfncis.de... "Mrbledsoe" <Mrbledsoethesmindaoc (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:e22Ma.1542$Fl5.1372 (AT) nwrddc02 (DOT) gnilink.net... In this case what he did was clearly within the rules as was what JPM did, my only question about what JPM did was it really necessary? YFI Why? |
Quote:
|
He asks a completely legitimate question. Juan Pinball was obviously faster than Michael at that point. Why risk both their races with a dangerous, blunder-headed pass like that?? |
unclean, obviously; blunder-headed, certainly.
Quote:
|
I think you're the FI. Some folks appear to thing passing belongs in a sport known as motor "racing". Others are content to watch a parade decided by the software engineers, as in launch control. Or at least, as long as one's favourite driver and/or team is at the head of the parade. Which may be the reason why Rindt, Peterson and Villeneuve G are revered, despite their number of wins being nowhere near those of Schumacher. |
(SEE Cunliffe, et al.), Schumacher wrote the current technical rules.
....It's always seemed to me that he simply mastered them.
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
I think you're the FI. Some folks appear to thing passing belongs in a sport known as motor "racing". Others are content to watch a parade decided by the software engineers, as in launch control. Or at least, as long as one's favourite driver and/or team is at the head of the parade. Which may be the reason why Rindt, Peterson and Villeneuve G are revered, despite their number of wins being nowhere near those of Schumacher. Gee... I wasn't aware that, amongst his many other alleged atrocities (SEE Cunliffe, et al.), Schumacher wrote the current technical rules. |
Quote:
|
...It's always seemed to me that he simply mastered them. |
which to measure any contemporary F1 driver. His mastery of the present
tech rules is not arguable. But other drivers, far less successfull in
statistical terms, have become part of Formula One legend for very
different reasons than mastery of tech regs and having an obedient team
mate.
Doc
Quote:
| |
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.