 | |
Sato & Schumacher
Formula 1 Formula 1 motor racing discusions (rec.autos.sport.f1)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#31
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: Sato & Schumacher -
09-12-2005
, 12:30 PM
|
CatharticF1 wrote: "The Sentinel" <Bt (AT) NoSpam (DOT) co.uk> wrote in news:43244388.0@entanet: While I agree that Sato was at fault for the incident, who does Schumacher think he is knocking Sato's visor down when he confronted him? Would he of done the same to Montoya or Villeneuve? ......... I doubt it, not without creating another Piquet / Salazar incident anyway.{;o). 1. The tap was to get his attention - there was no risk of decapitation.. 2. Sato has - shall we say - a track record, and his driving has been brought up in driver's meetings. 3. Michael - like everyone else, has a right to be pissed off. Much more than you sitting in judgement. You should move on.. Sato's a menace. The sooner he's out of F1 the better. For once Michael wasn't at fault and had every right to be thoroughly pissed-off at Sato's driving, which would have been unacceptable even for a rookie; It possibly cost Michael a podium, certainly deprived him of a reasonable qualifying run position next time out. |
almost the same spot) Michael's running him on to the grass in Kemmel
in 2000?
If Sato's fumble warranted a rap on the head, that one must have been
worth a disembowelling, surely?
--
Ian
#32
| |||
| |||
|
| Da Frank wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:59:57 +0100, Ian Dalziel iandalziel (AT) lineone (DOT) net> wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:55:37 +1000, fajp (AT) ooptushome (DOT) com.au (Da Frank) wrote: ground my arse for a week That must have stung a bit? LOL. Yeah, but once used to the corundum, shitting in the woods is like a holiday..  "noli illegitimi carborundum" or the singular version, you motto by any chance. I don't motto. Rossi does. |
--
Regards, Frank
#33
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 12 Sep 2005 14:03:29 GMT, "Paul-B" <paul (AT) null (DOT) invalid.com> wrote: CatharticF1 wrote: "The Sentinel" <Bt (AT) NoSpam (DOT) co.uk> wrote in news:43244388.0@entanet: While I agree that Sato was at fault for the incident, who does Schumacher think he is knocking Sato's visor down when he confronted him? Would he of done the same to Montoya or Villeneuve? ......... I doubt it, not without creating another Piquet / Salazar incident anyway.{;o). 1. The tap was to get his attention - there was no risk of decapitation.. 2. Sato has - shall we say - a track record, and his driving has been brought up in driver's meetings. 3. Michael - like everyone else, has a right to be pissed off. Much more than you sitting in judgement. You should move on.. Sato's a menace. The sooner he's out of F1 the better. For once Michael wasn't at fault and had every right to be thoroughly pissed-off at Sato's driving, which would have been unacceptable even for a rookie; It possibly cost Michael a podium, certainly deprived him of a reasonable qualifying run position next time out. So - what action was Mika entitled to take when he was discussing (in almost the same spot) Michael's running him on to the grass in Kemmel in 2000? If Sato's fumble warranted a rap on the head, that one must have been worth a disembowelling, surely? -- Ian |
nut... MS is a ....?
Well he doesnt do any form of self defence or offence..
#34
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel (AT) lineone (DOT) net> wrote in message news:hiebi1dnmnnol6cg4l22kpaes9ojujjrcv (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On 12 Sep 2005 14:03:29 GMT, "Paul-B" <paul (AT) null (DOT) invalid.com> wrote: CatharticF1 wrote: "The Sentinel" <Bt (AT) NoSpam (DOT) co.uk> wrote in news:43244388.0@entanet: While I agree that Sato was at fault for the incident, who does Schumacher think he is knocking Sato's visor down when he confronted him? Would he of done the same to Montoya or Villeneuve? ......... I doubt it, not without creating another Piquet / Salazar incident anyway.{;o). 1. The tap was to get his attention - there was no risk of decapitation.. 2. Sato has - shall we say - a track record, and his driving has been brought up in driver's meetings. 3. Michael - like everyone else, has a right to be pissed off. Much more than you sitting in judgement. You should move on.. Sato's a menace. The sooner he's out of F1 the better. For once Michael wasn't at fault and had every right to be thoroughly pissed-off at Sato's driving, which would have been unacceptable even for a rookie; It possibly cost Michael a podium, certainly deprived him of a reasonable qualifying run position next time out. So - what action was Mika entitled to take when he was discussing (in almost the same spot) Michael's running him on to the grass in Kemmel in 2000? If Sato's fumble warranted a rap on the head, that one must have been worth a disembowelling, surely? -- Ian Thing is that out of the car Sato would kick MS butt, he's a marshal arts nut... MS is a ....? Well he doesnt do any form of self defence or offence.. |
--
CatharticF1
'What you thought was freedom is just greed'
#35
| |||
| |||
|
|
Would he of done the same to Montoya or Villeneuve? ......... I doubt it, not without creating another Piquet / Salazar incident anyway.{;o). 1. The tap was to get his attention Utter nonsense, no it wasn't. What is the point of just making things up. |
--
CatharticF1
'What you thought was freedom is just greed'
#36
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel (AT) lineone (DOT) net> wrote in message news:ear8i1dom3j321ppd4qpd421sjbf9k3l7k (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:33:12 +0100, "The Sentinel" <Bt (AT) NoSpam (DOT) co.uk wrote: Remind me when he last did something like that? -- Ian A few years ago, he went ballistic after running into Coulthard from behind. (True, Michael would prefer to torpedo other drivers amidships;>) It was in heavy rain, there was a lot of mist and he drove right up DC's roostertail. Then claimed Coulthard was trying to kill him. |
more...
#37
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tomo <tmanineu324 (AT) btinternet (DOT) com> wrote: On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:40:43 +0100, "The Sentinel" <Bt (AT) NoSpam (DOT) co.uk wrote: While I agree that Sato was at fault for the incident, who does Schumacher think he is knocking Sato's visor down when he confronted him? Would he of done the same to Montoya or Villeneuve? ......... I doubt it, not without creating another Piquet / Salazar incident anyway.{;o). Time to move on Michael. Just a tap, really, nothing more. Why is it most Brits have a problem with Michael? I don't particularly like him , but to fault him obsessively is over the top. It's the chin. It's offensive. :v That explains why the English, the land of chinless wonders, |
Tony S.
#38
| |||
| |||
|
|
"The Sentinel" <Bt (AT) NoSpam (DOT) co.uk> wrote in news:43244388.0@entanet: While I agree that Sato was at fault for the incident, who does Schumacher think he is knocking Sato's visor down when he confronted him? Would he of done the same to Montoya or Villeneuve? ......... I doubt it, not without creating another Piquet / Salazar incident anyway.{;o). 1. The tap was to get his attention - there was no risk of decapitation.. 2. Sato has - shall we say - a track record, and his driving has been brought up in driver's meetings. 3. Michael - like everyone else, has a right to be pissed off. Much more than you sitting in judgement. You should move on.. And if it had been Montoya in that situation rather than |
Tony S.
#39
| |||
| |||
|
#40
| |||
| |||
|
|
He didn't knock his visor down. He swung at air in frustration. Look at the replay. |
revealed, "
Who needs to look at the replay??
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.