AutosTalk Forums  

Some revised initial thoughts (Spoilers)

Formula 1 Formula 1 motor racing discusions (rec.autos.sport.f1)


Discuss Some revised initial thoughts (Spoilers) in the Formula 1 forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old   
Phil Newnham
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Some revised initial thoughts (Spoilers) - 03-19-2007 , 10:57 AM






DC wrote:
Quote:
On 19 Mar, 14:21, Phil Newnham <pnewn... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
DC wrote:
On 18 Mar, 11:53, Richard Miller <rich... (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk
wrote:
Red Bull Racing: That was a real kamikaze move from DC. At least he was
man enough to accept full blame for it. I didn't see what happened to
push Webber back down the field. But it does sound as though this car
has some inherent potential that we may see as the season develops.
Bit of a bonehead move by DC and, as you say, kudos to him for
admitting it. The slow-mo replay from Alex's cockpit induced shudders.
He's a very lucky man.
"That gets scarier every time I see it" - possibly the first time I've
agreed with James Allen's opinion on something, certainly the first time
in a long time.

Let's not get carried away. Martin Brundle said it first...
Did he? I thought it was a JA original. Should've guessed, really...
James Allen, original thought...

--
Phil

http://www.usefilm.com/photographer/31307.html


Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old   
CatharticF1
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Some revised initial thoughts (Spoilers) - 03-20-2007 , 01:58 AM






ts <ts_0053NO (AT) SPAMyahoo (DOT) com> wrote in
newsan.2007.03.18.17.23.57 (AT) SPAMyahoo (DOT) com:

Quote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:06:52 +0000, Richard Miller wrote:

In message <8mlqv21ckcbk3pfkqkh5ctlhtaqntjin9m (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, a_Frank
fajp (AT) notthis (DOT) optushome.com.au> writes

Hm.. as i recall Massa was 1 stopping, as opposed to Kimi 2 stopping.
So there you'd have about a second easily. Then he spent half the
race on the softs, which lasted about 10 laps before graining even
for the two stoppers, and he spent that in traffic.

All of that is ample reason why he would not consistently have been
near the top of the Ferrari's potential pace. It does not, to me at
least, explain why even on his best lap of the afternoon he did not
get close.

The effect of 1 stopping was that FM's tires would have been more worn
than KR's when their fuel loads were equivalent. FM's fastest lap was
at the end of his first stint while KR's was at the end of his second.
Assuming that their fuel loads were equivalent at that time, FM had
28 laps on his soft tires while KR had 22 on his hard tires. Also,
remember that KR had an opportunity to go for a fast lap on every lap
of the race whereas FM had relatively few laps where he wasn't closely
following someone else.
Well I tend to agree with Richard, and here are some additional reasons
why:

Look at Bahrain last year. Kimi one-stopped from the rear and his best lap
was only around 4 tenths off the best of the *race*. And better only one
tenth off his teammate - JPM (who two-stopped).

The other thing to consider here is that Massa had a reason to go quickly.
Kimi didn't.

And more, the track is typically at its quickest when all the rubber is
down at the end, and this was the time Massa was reeling in Fisichella with
a clear track.

--
CatharticF1

"What you thought was Freedom is just Greed."


Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old   
CatharticF1
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Some revised initial thoughts (Spoilers) - 03-20-2007 , 02:00 AM



"ttow" <ttows (AT) yahoo (DOT) es> wrote in news:1174228093.812340.235240
@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:

Quote:
On Mar 18, 7:53 am, Richard Miller <rich... (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk
wrote:
Ferrari: It's in a league of its own.

True but Alonso has already proven twice that he doesn't need to drive
the best or fastest car to become a World Champion.
So why didn't he win?

Quote:
Ferrari should be
worried that Alonso is driving a more competitive car than last
season and that this time around he's got a competent driver by his
side in his team. This won't be a cakewalk for Ferrari.
So the McLaren is more competitive than the Renault was? Really - so why
didn't he win? He can overcome any car deficit, can't he?

--
CatharticF1

"What you thought was Freedom is just Greed."


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.