![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
other than ferrari? I think these dicks at FIA need to get their coverage fixed next yea |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
other than ferrari? I think these dicks at FIA need to get their coverage fixed next yea |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Suburban" <sub.this (AT) sub (DOT) that> wrote in news:npGdnV836b1FeofeRVn-tQ (AT) rogers (DOT) com: other than ferrari? I think these dicks at FIA need to get their coverage fixed next yea As far as I know, they use the host country's film crews and editors/directors, so coverage ends up being biased towards the driver or team that hails from that country. They give Japanese drivers significantly more coverage at Suzuka than any other race. Suppose one solution would be for Bernie to create his own traveling tv crew. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Darek" <asd (AT) asd (DOT) com> wrote in message news:Xns96C760095FC95asdasdcom (AT) 130 (DOT) 81.64.196... "Suburban" <sub.this (AT) sub (DOT) that> wrote in news:npGdnV836b1FeofeRVn-tQ (AT) rogers (DOT) com: other than ferrari? I think these dicks at FIA need to get their coverage fixed next yea As far as I know, they use the host country's film crews and editors/directors, so coverage ends up being biased towards the driver or team that hails from that country. They give Japanese drivers significantly more coverage at Suzuka than any other race. Suppose one solution would be for Bernie to create his own traveling tv crew. He tried that with Digital F1a few years ago which failed dismally. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Suburban" <sub.this (AT) sub (DOT) that> wrote in news:npGdnV836b1FeofeRVn-tQ (AT) rogers (DOT) com: other than ferrari? I think these dicks at FIA need to get their coverage fixed next yea As far as I know, they use the host country's film crews and editors/directors, so coverage ends up being biased towards the driver or team that hails from that country. They give Japanese drivers significantly more coverage at Suzuka than any other race. I don't think we saw much, if any, more of Ferrari than on other |
|
Suppose one solution would be for Bernie to create his own traveling tv crew. The solution would be for Bernie to have the hosts sign a contract on |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 13:29:27 GMT, Darek <asd (AT) asd (DOT) com> wrote: "Suburban" <sub.this (AT) sub (DOT) that> wrote in news:npGdnV836b1FeofeRVn-tQ (AT) rogers (DOT) com: other than ferrari? I think these dicks at FIA need to get their coverage fixed next yea As far as I know, they use the host country's film crews and editors/directors, so coverage ends up being biased towards the driver or team that hails from that country. They give Japanese drivers significantly more coverage at Suzuka than any other race. I don't think we saw much, if any, more of Ferrari than on other races, but the coverage was quite bad. The editor seemed to cut from camera to camera for no apparent reason. When Kimi was having the tyre problem we were watching JPM. It was a bit of a boring race, made worse by the telecast. Sad.. Monza used to be a hoot to watch. Suppose one solution would be for Bernie to create his own traveling tv crew. The solution would be for Bernie to have the hosts sign a contract on the average or minimum and maximum amounts of time spent on each car. On the other hand the country hosting the race should, IMO, be allowed to have more coverage of it's own driver or car.. It is probably a lot more difficult to figure this out any better than the way it works now, when all parties and money issues come into the mix. I think the issue here is the obvious disconnect between the commentators |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
other than ferrari? I think these dicks at FIA need to get their coverage fixed next yea |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |