Thoughts on Hamilton

#41

Ray O'Hara wrote:

Quote:

you make it look like
me just
FUCKING ASSHOLE
thank you/.

--
Bigbird
#

#42

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:55:48 +1100, "David Melville"
<davidmelville (AT) exemail (DOT) com.au> wrote:

Quote:

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:55:43 +1100, Ray O'Hara <raymond-ohara (AT) hotmail (DOT) com
wrote:

"David Melville" <davidmelville (AT) exemail (DOT) com.au> wrote in message
news

p.u2qp7od6h6mygt (AT) david-desktop (DOT) ..
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:23:32 +1100, Happi Monday <happi (AT) munday (DOT) com
wrote:

Ray O'Hara wrote:
and being Black is never an advantage.

Being black is what gets him all the attention (even though he's
half-white).

Which half?
--
Cheers,
Dave

Don't touch me unless you love me.

um. you make it look like all you are replying to was written by me.
because you trimmed the header/name of the person who wrote " Being
black is
what gets him all the attention (even though he's
half-white)."

so let me just say FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE, LEARN HOW TO TRIM
PROPERLY!.
thank you/.

I didn't trim nuffink. Just clicked reply.

So figure dat out, Paddy.

It woz Happi Monday wot dun it.
--
Henry Birkin Bt.

#43

On Nov 2, 2:55*am, "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

"David Melville" <davidmelvi... (AT) exemail (DOT) com.au> wrote in message

news

p.u2qp7od6h6mygt (AT) david-desktop (DOT) ..

On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:23:32 +1100, Happi Monday <ha... (AT) munday (DOT) com> wrote:

Ray O'Hara wrote:
and being Black is never an advantage.

Being black is what gets him all the attention (even though he's
half-white).

Which half?
--
Cheers,
Dave

Don't touch me unless you love me.

*um. you make it look like all you are replying to was written by me.
because you trimmed the header/name of the person who wrote " Being blackis
what gets him all the attention (even though he's
half-white)."

so let me just say FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE, LEARN HOW TO TRIM
PROPERLY!.
thank you/.

Wow. Do you always overreact like that?

#44

David Melville wrote:

Quote:

On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:25:09 +1100, mower man <nospam (AT) f2s (DOT) com> wrote:

Matthew Pope wrote:
"Advanced Kitty" <nokia.account (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote in
news:7l52tiF3cb6b0U1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net:
Matthew Pope wrote:
In 2007 and 2008, I disliked Hamilton... immensely. He came across as
a bit of a so and so who has had everything handed to him and feels
he is owed plenty. Not saying that's how he is, just how he came
across to me.

This year, he's different. Something has changed. I've seen his true
colours as a racer. He's not complaining about his lot at the start
of the year, having a grossly uncompetitive car, and got on with the
job of racing the car hard, qualifying hard and trying his arse off.

Kudos to you LH. Wouldn't be surprised to see you win handsomely
tonight, and challenge strongly for the championship in 2010.

Sometimes it's in how we accept defeat that we endear ourselves to
others.
The British hate a winner.
The class system has a great deal to answer for.
A shame, because at least half the population views the world
through shit-tinted glasses.
Hamilton was a born racer - and anyone too blind to see that either
has a heavy shade of shit going on ... or just ain't the sharpest tool
in the box. I think matters are obfuscated (word of the day - 10
points thanks) by
the Hamster's rather bland personality, which makes him less appealing
than other, more 'out there' drivers.

Seven shades of shit in front of Fred, IMHO.

British? I'm Australian. I generally hate the British... :-) That's
the shit that's been tinting my glasses.
His personality is a little bit more likeable, a little bit more
interesting this year.

I'm British/European, and I'm not predisposed to hate anyone :-)

Hamilton? He's bloody good!

I'm an Earthman.

Wish I'd said that. True :-)

--

Chris

I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)

#45

Ray O'Hara wrote:

Quote:

"David Melville" <davidmelville (AT) exemail (DOT) com.au> wrote in message
news

p.u2qp7od6h6mygt (AT) david-desktop (DOT) ..
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:23:32 +1100, Happi Monday <happi (AT) munday (DOT) com> wrote:

Ray O'Hara wrote:
and being Black is never an advantage.
Being black is what gets him all the attention (even though he's
half-white).
Which half?
--
Cheers,
Dave

Don't touch me unless you love me.

um. you make it look like all you are replying to was written by me.
because you trimmed the header/name of the person who wrote " Being black is
what gets him all the attention (even though he's
half-white)."

so let me just say FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE, LEARN HOW TO TRIM
PROPERLY!.
thank you/.

Naughty corner, NOW.

--

Chris

I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)

#46

CatharticF1 wrote:

Quote:

Matthew Pope <matt&samatNOSPAMiinet.netdotau> wrote in
news:Xns9CB6BB4B0D4E4mattsamnoSPAMiinetdo (AT) 216 (DOT) 196.97.142:

In 2007 and 2008, I disliked Hamilton... immensely. He came across
as a bit of a so and so who has had everything handed to him and
feels he is owed plenty. Not saying that's how he is, just how he
came across to me.

Ditto.

Though in the eyes of those who can't see it, this was only
explicable by playing the race card.

Brendan, you were over the hill and out of sight before the bandwagon
you are trying to board set off.

If reality catches up with you and you want to explain feel free.

--
Bigbird
#

#47

On Nov 2, 6:26*am, CatharticF1 <rasf1pos... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

Matthew Pope <matt&samatNOSPAMiinet.netdotau> wrote innews:Xns9CB6BB4B0D4E4mattsamnoSPAMiinetdo (AT) 216 (DOT) 196.97.142:

In 2007 and 2008, I disliked Hamilton... immensely. He came across as
a bit of a so and so who has had everything handed to him and feels he
is owed plenty. Not saying that's how he is, just how he came across
to me.

Ditto.

Though in the eyes of those who can't see it, this was only explicable by
playing the race card.

<Slaps forehead>
You flaming great nincompoop. You wouldn't know the race card if it
came up tweaked your nose and called you a honkey!

#48

In message <7l54m2F3ajq38U1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net>, Paul-B <paul (AT) rasf1 (DOT) net>
writes

Quote:

Advanced Kitty wrote:

The British hate a winner.

Rubbish.

You speak only for yourself, not the rest of us Brits.

I think the Feline One has a point, though. The Brits love an underdog,
and tend to be uncomfortable about winning, and winners. God knows what
would happen to this country if Murray were to win Wimbledon, or England
the World Cup next year - a collective nervous breakdown I would think.
--
Richard Miller

#49

Richard Miller <richard (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote in
news:9P3aMSbEQH8KFwEU (AT) seasalter0 (DOT) demon.co.uk:

Quote:

In message <7l54m2F3ajq38U1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net>, Paul-B <paul (AT) rasf1 (DOT) net
writes
Advanced Kitty wrote:

The British hate a winner.

Rubbish.

You speak only for yourself, not the rest of us Brits.

I think the Feline One has a point, though. The Brits love an underdog,
and tend to be uncomfortable about winning, and winners. God knows what
would happen to this country if Murray were to win Wimbledon, or England
the World Cup next year - a collective nervous breakdown I would think.

Fair go, you grew very comfortable with winning the RWC in 2003, and the
Ashes in 05 and 09. A FIFA WC would fit nicely in the trophy cabinet...

#50

On Nov 4, 12:02*pm, Matthew Pope <matt&samatNOSPAMiinet.netdotau>
wrote:

Quote:

Fair go, you grew very comfortable with winning the RWC in 2003, and the
Ashes in 05 and 09. A FIFA WC would fit nicely in the trophy cabinet...

Ohhh, C'mon, the Aussies could've won those easily, even the British
know we let them win occasionally just to stop them spitting the
dummy.
;-)

beers,
build