![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
Brian Lawrence wrote: For the record, the current 3-way tie for the WDC lead is almost a first. There was a similar tie in 1950 when the first three races had different winners who failed to score in the other two events. However, the third event was the Indy 500, so it doesn't really count. Another "first" - Hamilton is the first rookie to lead the WDC. There is a proviso - excluding 1950 when the three leaders were all rookies in the championship since there wasn't a championship before that date. In 1950 it was Farina/Fangio/Johnny Parsons. Is it my imagination, or is there something unusual about this year? :-) |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
For the record, the current 3-way tie for the WDC lead is almost a first. There was a similar tie in 1950 when the first three races had different winners who failed to score in the other two events. However, the third event was the Indy 500, so it doesn't really count. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
Is it my imagination, or is there something unusual about this year? |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 2007-04-16, ric zito <ADDRESS (AT) IN (DOT) SIG> wrote: Phil Newnham <pnewnham (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Is he technically in the lead, or does Alonso lead by countback? Or does countback not count until the end of the season? Surely LH is third? By my reasoning : Kimi is leading with 1st, 3rd, 3rd Fred is second with 2nd,1st, 5th Should Kimi be ahead of Fred? Are two third places better than a second and a fifth? According to the points system, 1st + 3rd + 3rd are equally as good as 2nd + 1st + 5th. According to the tie-breaking rules, one second place beats any number of third places. |

#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
Brian Lawrence wrote: For the record, the current 3-way tie for the WDC lead is almost a first. There was a similar tie in 1950 when the first three races had different winners who failed to score in the other two events. However, the third event was the Indy 500, so it doesn't really count. Another "first" - Hamilton is the first rookie to lead the WDC. There is a proviso - excluding 1950 when the three leaders were all rookies in the championship since there wasn't a championship before that date. In 1950 it was Farina/Fangio/Johnny Parsons. Is it my imagination, or is there something unusual about this year? |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
Is it my imagination, or is there something unusual about this year? :-) |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
John Briggs wrote: Is it my imagination, or is there something unusual about this year? :-) Yes, Sato hasn't cleaned up anyone yet. It's Sutil's year. :-) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |