![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
For the record, the current 3-way tie for the WDC lead is almost a first. There was a similar tie in 1950 when the first three races had different winners who failed to score in the other two events. However, the third event was the Indy 500, so it doesn't really count. Another "first" - Hamilton is the first rookie to lead the WDC. There is a proviso - excluding 1950 when the three leaders were all rookies in the championship since there wasn't a championship before that date. In 1950 it was Farina/Fangio/Johnny Parsons. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
For the record, the current 3-way tie for the WDC lead is almost a first. There was a similar tie in 1950 when the first three races had different winners who failed to score in the other two events. However, the third event was the Indy 500, so it doesn't really count. Another "first" - Hamilton is the first rookie to lead the WDC. There is a proviso - excluding 1950 when the three leaders were all rookies in the championship since there wasn't a championship before that date. In 1950 it was Farina/Fangio/Johnny Parsons. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Brian Lawrence wrote: For the record, the current 3-way tie for the WDC lead is almost a first. There was a similar tie in 1950 when the first three races had different winners who failed to score in the other two events. However, the third event was the Indy 500, so it doesn't really count. Another "first" - Hamilton is the first rookie to lead the WDC. There is a proviso - excluding 1950 when the three leaders were all rookies in the championship since there wasn't a championship before that date. In 1950 it was Farina/Fangio/Johnny Parsons. Is he technically in the lead, or does Alonso lead by countback? Or does countback not count until the end of the season? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Phil Newnham" <pnewnham (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Brian Lawrence wrote: For the record, the current 3-way tie for the WDC lead is almost a first. There was a similar tie in 1950 when the first three races had different winners who failed to score in the other two events. However, the third event was the Indy 500, so it doesn't really count. Another "first" - Hamilton is the first rookie to lead the WDC. There is a proviso - excluding 1950 when the three leaders were all rookies in the championship since there wasn't a championship before that date. In 1950 it was Farina/Fangio/Johnny Parsons. Is he technically in the lead, or does Alonso lead by countback? Or does countback not count until the end of the season? Technically - IE the FIA - have Alonso first, Kimi 2nd & Lewis 3rd, but no one seems to feel that has any value unless there are ties at the end of the season. It was never relevant over the previous 57. |
|
In at least two places on autosport.com and in my newspaper it says we have 3 drivers in joint lead. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Is he technically in the lead, or does Alonso lead by countback? Or does countback not count until the end of the season? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
For the record, the current 3-way tie for the WDC lead is almost a first. There was a similar tie in 1950 when the first three races had different winners who failed to score in the other two events. However, the third event was the Indy 500, so it doesn't really count. Another "first" - Hamilton is the first rookie to lead the WDC. There is a proviso - excluding 1950 when the three leaders were all rookies in the championship since there wasn't a championship before that date. In 1950 it was Farina/Fangio/Johnny Parsons. -- Brian W Lawrence Wantage, Oxfordshire, UK Brian_W_Lawre... (AT) msn (DOT) com |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Phil Newnham <pnewnham (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Is he technically in the lead, or does Alonso lead by countback? Or does countback not count until the end of the season? Surely LH is third? By my reasoning : Kimi is leading with 1st, 3rd, 3rd Fred is second with 2nd,1st, 5th Should Kimi be ahead of Fred? Are two third places better than a second and a fifth? |
|
Lewis is third with 3rd, 2nd, 2nd |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Phil Newnham <pnewnham (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Is he technically in the lead, or does Alonso lead by countback? Or does countback not count until the end of the season? Surely LH is third? By my reasoning : Kimi is leading with 1st, 3rd, 3rd Fred is second with 2nd,1st, 5th Should Kimi be ahead of Fred? Are two third places better than a second and a fifth? |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Phil Newnham <pnewnham (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Is he technically in the lead, or does Alonso lead by countback? Or does countback not count until the end of the season? Surely LH is third? By my reasoning : Kimi is leading with 1st, 3rd, 3rd Fred is second with 2nd,1st, 5th Should Kimi be ahead of Fred? Are two third places better than a second and a fifth? Lewis is third with 3rd, 2nd, 2nd No way.. you guys are so daft. |

![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |