 | |
What's going on?
Formula 1 Formula 1 motor racing discusions (rec.autos.sport.f1)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: What's going on? -
11-06-2009
, 05:40 PM
|
The way I read many of the posts here is that they want someone to blame for their fav team or drivers failures so they grab at the thinnest of threads and end up sounding irrational or just plain stupid. Then the thread disintegrates to simple abuse of people they don't even know. |
than you do ;-)
Comprehensive killfiling helps, but of those left standing, I don't
see an awful lot of what you say above, much less so than on the web
forums where you can't deploy the killfile so readily.
However if person A says "max did this and it's bad" and person B says
"max did this other thing and it's bad", it's wrong to blether on
about "everyone thinks max did this and the other thing" then paint
yourself as the only reasonable person, which is what AC tends to do.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
http://youtube.com/tarcus69
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarcus/sets/
#32
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 2009-11-06, build <bui... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: The way I read many of the posts here is that they want someone to blame for their fav team or drivers failures so they grab at the thinnest of threads and end up sounding irrational or just plain stupid. Then the thread disintegrates to simple abuse of people they don't even know. I'm not so sure about the "many" bit, maybe I skip more of the posts than you do ;-) Comprehensive killfiling helps, but of those left standing, I don't see an awful lot of what you say above, much less so than on the web forums where you can't deploy the killfile so readily. However if person A says "max did this and it's bad" and person B says "max did this other thing and it's bad", it's wrong to blether on about "everyone thinks max did this and the other thing" then paint yourself as the only reasonable person, which is what AC tends to do. -- |
I don't really concentrate on who's who and get Peter confused with
Paul and the abusive contributors all sound alike anyway. I tried the
ignore thing but snipped replies can get confusing and I find myself
using google so I might kill the killfile. I'm slowly learning to
browse past the "I hate Max 'n Bernie" posts ;-)
beers,
build
#33
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Nov 6, 11:37 am, "David Melville" <davidmelvi... (AT) exemail (DOT) com.au wrote: On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:43:49 +1100, AC <x... (AT) xxx (DOT) xxx> wrote: Calm down, Max has gone. Interesting that all you do is bang on about KERS and not the issue in hand. But then this is quite typical of the > anti Max loon brigade. Anything Max says and touches is wrong. Blah, > blah, blah. AC Yes, but, AC, you continue to come across as the resident Mosely apologist. From this side of the screen, on the MM issue, you sound pretty "blah blah blah" yourself. Sorry, mate. That's just how it reads. -- Cheers, Dave G'day Dave, That's not how it reads mate, sorry. As a newish poster to this group, I'd say AC's position is one of the most reasonable here on things FIA. His seems rather pragmatic against irrational hatred of a public body. beers, build |
Mosely have been well-reasoned, and reasonably offered, but, it is my
humble opinion, that he has strayed awfully close to the position of
Devil's Advocate, and been unable to see some of the negatives /in their
proper perspective/.
And welcome, build. I wasn't sure if you were a new "member" or not, but
your contributions have been appreciated.
--
Cheers,
Dave
Don't touch me unless you love me.
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.