<Wcub4 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote
Quote:
Mark Webber has been faster than Nick Heidfeld allmost every race this
season and was 1 second faster than Pizzonia at Monza. He's still is
amazingly fast. If the Williams-Ford proves to be a winning combination
next year and he is faster than his teammates like he allways is than
most people will speak all of a sudden differently about him. ( I seen
him racing in F3000 were he beat Alonso in equal cars so the boy can
race :P ) |
I donno, he seems like a great test driver who can even qualify well. As a
racer, he falls short. He is not the only one in today's F1 that has the
tester's spirit rather than racer's. Great racers are fast and stay out of
trouble. They have that extra set of eyes and quick hands. Webber, on the
other hand, seems like a magnet for trouble - always finding it at any stage
during a race. As for Webber being faster than Pizzonia and Heidfeld, I
don't know how you determined this. According to the final positions in the
race, Webber has not fared well. According to the fastest laps chart over
the past few races (I haven't checked the whole season) he has trailed his
teammates by as much as 1/2 a second.
Monza saw Webber start 14th and Pizzonia 16th (behind the traffic that was
Webber's down fall this time out) and yet Pizzonia managed to escape that
without hitting anybody and finished in the points at 7th compared to
Webber's dismal 14th. By all rights, Webber should have eaten Pizzonia for
breakfast - especially since Webber thinks Pizzonia is good for nothing, a
belief he made abundantly clear many times at the start of this season.
No, Webber seems to be a great tester but not much of a racer. Looking at
the passing stats for the season about sums up my point. Passes made: Webber
4; Heidfeld 9. Passed by others: Webber 5; Heidfeld 1. Points: Webber 24;
Heidfeld/Pizzonia 30.