AutosTalk Forums  

Dead brands walking

General Motors Discussions About General Motors vehicles (alt.autos.gm)


Discuss Dead brands walking in the General Motors forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Jim Higgins
 
Posts: n/a

Default Dead brands walking - 04-26-2007 , 06:51 PM






Dead brands walking
http://tinyurl.com/ysmgre

NEW YORK (Fortune) -- The news that Toyota has finally passed General
Motors in global sales is about as surprising as John McCain finally
announcing he's running for president. But now that it is officially
Number Two, it is time for GM to perform some long-overdue surgery on
its brand portfolio. Age has taken its toll, and GM is overdue for a
face lift.

In some ways, GM (Charts, Fortune 500) is still built for the size it
was 50 years ago. In the United States, GM's market share is half of
what it used to be but it sells seven brands - two more than in its
heyday. Toyota (Charts), by contrast, gets by with only three brands:
Toyota, Lexus and Scion.

Despite its shrinking market share, GM has always argued that there is
value in its broad brand portfolio. Consumers want choice, and having a
variety of brands allows GM to segment the car market more finely than
its competitors. If GM eliminates a brand, it fears losing long-time buyers.

But there is a big cost to maintaining all those nameplates. Buyers
increasingly demand uniquely engineered models that are costly to
develop. Multiple brands mean multiple expenditures for marketing,
advertising and distribution. Still suffering from negative cash flow,
GM simply has too many mouths to feed.

So GM should adopt a template similar to Toyota's. Keep Chevrolet where
it is - the volume brand that is the heartbeat of America. Maintain
Cadillac at the top of the market and expand its product offerings with
derivatives of the popular CTS. And continue to use Saturn, with its
dedicated dealer channel and loyal buyers, as the brand for import
intenders.

Plenty of excess baggage remains. Here are my recommendations:

* It is past time to perform euthanasia on Buick. Successive waves
of new models haven't moved the needle on sales and it is unlikely that
the new Enclave crossover will make a big difference. For nostalgia
buffs, the Buick brand can soldier on in China, where it is uniquely
beloved.
* Pontiac should get the same treatment, though without the Asian
escape hatch. Its boy-racer image is dated and GM's one-time excitement
division has deteriorated into a regional blue-collar brand. In a world
that increasingly is going green, there is little upside for its
testosterone-laced pavement rippers.
* Whatever noble intentions GM had for Hummer, they have been
permanently damaged by the greenhouse gas debate. Hummer should be sold
to whomever winds up with Jeep after Chrysler is broken up. More Jeeps
fall off the truck on the way to the dealer than Hummer sells in a week.
* Turn GMC into a commercial truck brand. As gasoline becomes more
expensive, there won't be enough traffic in personal-use trucks for GMC
to share with Chevy. There are lots of opportunities with huskier trucks
that a player with GM's scale could exploit in the business-to-business
market.
* Say goodbye to Saab. With its perpetually tiny volume and
high-cost European manufacturing base, Saab has defied GM's efforts for
nearly two decades to make it consistently profitable. The success of
Japanese sport-luxury brands Infiniti and Acura has made Saab irrelevant.

GM has been down this road before when it killed Oldsmobile.
Compensating Olds dealers was expensive but, in the end, nobody really
missed the brand. Other U.S. manufacturers have some soul-searching to
do, too. Ford (Charts, Fortune 500) needs to take a hard look at
Mercury, and the Chrysler brand may not survive a change in ownership,
now that Automotive News has disclosed that nearly half of Chrysler's
sales go to fleets. Like Plymouth, DeSoto and Packard, these are
nameplates for customers who scarcely exist any more

There may yet be a silver lining in this cloudy forecast. Detroit has
mostly lost the baby boom generation, but may have an opportunity to
capture their children. Analyst John Wolkonowicz of Global Insight is
convinced that since these young Gen Y buyers will never shop the brands
their parents did, they may boomerang back to domestic nameplates. What
GM and the rest of Detroit have to do is clear out the dead brush and
concentrate on brands that still have growth potential.



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.